K3Utility - Mac RF Calibration

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K3Utility - Mac RF Calibration

Grant Youngman
Did we ever ever get anything final on the "subtle bug" that may have  
created a problem with RF Gain calibration in the Mac version of K3  
Utility?

I used the new test version sent out a few days ago, calibrated to an  
XG2 on 20M.  Didn't have to adjust S-Meter cal on the Main receiver,  
but did cal the Sub S-Meter, which I'd ignored up until now.  All  
seemed well, until I powered on the K3 today, and noticed what seemed  
to be "scotch" S-Meter readings.  A recheck with the XG-2 shows only  
about S-7 with the 50uV test signal.

Grant/NQ5T
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3Utility - Mac RF Calibration

Don Wilhelm-4
Grant,

Re-do the S-meter Cal on the main receiver.  There seems to be some
confusion on this topic, but there is only *one* set of S-meter
calibration settings (at least that is the way it is right now).  So
when you thought you were calibrating the subRX S-meter, you likely
messed up the settings for both the main RX and the sub - I can't say
for certain but I think it has something to do with the 3 dB pad and
athe variety of ways to connect the subRX antenna..

73,
Don W3FPR

Grant Youngman wrote:

> Did we ever ever get anything final on the "subtle bug" that may have  
> created a problem with RF Gain calibration in the Mac version of K3  
> Utility?
>
> I used the new test version sent out a few days ago, calibrated to an  
> XG2 on 20M.  Didn't have to adjust S-Meter cal on the Main receiver,  
> but did cal the Sub S-Meter, which I'd ignored up until now.  All  
> seemed well, until I powered on the K3 today, and noticed what seemed  
> to be "scotch" S-Meter readings.  A recheck with the XG-2 shows only  
> about S-7 with the 50uV test signal.
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>  
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3Utility - Mac RF Calibration

Grant Youngman
Don ..

I realized that as I was redoing the adjustments one more time -- no  
separate S-meter adjustments for the Sub.    I'll start from scratch.

But the results do seem a bit odd.   As it now sits on the Main (and  
this is after mistakenly tweaking S_meter cal on the Sub), a 50uV  
signal yields an S-7 with preamp off and S-9 with preamp on, with the  
meter in Nor mode.  In Abs mode, I see S-7 with preamp off and S-6  
with preamp ON.

It's certainly possible (most likely?) that there's a cockpit problem  
here, but the results I'm getting don't look right.  Prior to all of  
this, there was no change in S-meter reading when activating the  
preamp in "abs" mode.

Grant/NQ5T


On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

> Grant,
>
> Re-do the S-meter Cal on the main receiver.  There seems to be some  
> confusion on this topic, but there is only *one* set of S-meter  
> calibration settings (at least that is the way it is right now).  So  
> when you thought you were calibrating the subRX S-meter, you likely  
> messed up the settings for both the main RX and the sub - I can't  
> say for certain but I think it has something to do with the 3 dB pad  
> and athe variety of ways to connect the subRX antenna..
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
> Grant Youngman wrote:
>> Did we ever ever get anything final on the "subtle bug" that may  
>> have  created a problem with RF Gain calibration in the Mac version  
>> of K3  Utility?
>>
>> I used the new test version sent out a few days ago, calibrated to  
>> an  XG2 on 20M.  Didn't have to adjust S-Meter cal on the Main  
>> receiver,  but did cal the Sub S-Meter, which I'd ignored up until  
>> now.  All  seemed well, until I powered on the K3 today, and  
>> noticed what seemed  to be "scotch" S-Meter readings.  A recheck  
>> with the XG-2 shows only  about S-7 with the 50uV test signal.
>>
>> Grant/NQ5T
>>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3Utility - Mac RF Calibration

Don Wilhelm-4
Grant,

The compensation between 'nor' and 'abs' is done in software, so it may
be that something you did in the calibrations has thrown it off a bit -
it is not hard to re-do both the RF gain and S-meter calibrations, so I
would do them both (in that order).

73,
Don W3FPR

Grant Youngman wrote:

> Don ..
>
> I realized that as I was redoing the adjustments one more time -- no  
> separate S-meter adjustments for the Sub.    I'll start from scratch.
>
> But the results do seem a bit odd.   As it now sits on the Main (and  
> this is after mistakenly tweaking S_meter cal on the Sub), a 50uV  
> signal yields an S-7 with preamp off and S-9 with preamp on, with the  
> meter in Nor mode.  In Abs mode, I see S-7 with preamp off and S-6  
> with preamp ON.
>
> It's certainly possible (most likely?) that there's a cockpit problem  
> here, but the results I'm getting don't look right.  Prior to all of  
> this, there was no change in S-meter reading when activating the  
> preamp in "abs" mode.
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>
> On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
>
>  
>> Grant,
>>
>> Re-do the S-meter Cal on the main receiver.  There seems to be some  
>> confusion on this topic, but there is only *one* set of S-meter  
>> calibration settings (at least that is the way it is right now).  So  
>> when you thought you were calibrating the subRX S-meter, you likely  
>> messed up the settings for both the main RX and the sub - I can't  
>> say for certain but I think it has something to do with the 3 dB pad  
>> and athe variety of ways to connect the subRX antenna..
>>
>> 73,
>> Don W3FPR
>>
>> Grant Youngman wrote:
>>    
>>> Did we ever ever get anything final on the "subtle bug" that may  
>>> have  created a problem with RF Gain calibration in the Mac version  
>>> of K3  Utility?
>>>
>>> I used the new test version sent out a few days ago, calibrated to  
>>> an  XG2 on 20M.  Didn't have to adjust S-Meter cal on the Main  
>>> receiver,  but did cal the Sub S-Meter, which I'd ignored up until  
>>> now.  All  seemed well, until I powered on the K3 today, and  
>>> noticed what seemed  to be "scotch" S-Meter readings.  A recheck  
>>> with the XG-2 shows only  about S-7 with the 50uV test signal.
>>>
>>> Grant/NQ5T
>>>
>>>      
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.424 / Virus Database: 270.14.49/2480 - Release Date: 11/04/09 07:37:00
>
>  
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html