K3s/KX3 CW decoders

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K3s/KX3 CW decoders

Michael Blake
I have found that the K3s and KX3 CW decoders work quite well.  Are they original work or based on something like CW Get or fldigi's algorithms?

Michael Blake
[hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3s/KX3 CW decoders

stengrevics
Really?  I have found just the opposite - that a CW signal has to be hugely strong to be decoded.  And, I don’t need it when a signal is strong.  I need it when signals are weak.  

How do you have it configured?

John
WA1EAZ

> On Apr 15, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Michael Blake <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I have found that the K3s and KX3 CW decoders work quite well.  Are they original work or based on something like CW Get or fldigi's algorithms?
>
> Michael Blake
> [hidden email]
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3s/KX3 CW decoders

Michael Blake
In reply to this post by Michael Blake
I am not sure what your configuration question meant John but I had no expectation that it would work well on weak, noisy or hand sent signals.

In comparison with fldigi, CW Get and Morse Decoder (on the Mac) I find that it works quite well.

Michael Blake
[hidden email]

On Apr 15, 2018, at 11:39 AM, John Stengrevics <[hidden email]> wrote:

Really? I have found just the opposite - that a CW signal has to be hugely strong to be decoded. And, I don’t need it when a signal is strong. I need it when signals are weak.

How do you have it configured?

John
WA1EAZ

On Apr 15, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Michael Blake <[hidden email]> wrote:

I have found that the K3s and KX3 CW decoders work quite well. Are they original work or based on something like CW Get or fldigi's algorithms?

Michael Blake
[hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]