|
Hi Guys,
I'm using a KAT-500 and am surprised that when I change bands it doesn't remember whether it was in Automatic or By-Pass the last time it was on that band. If my KAT-500 is set to "Automatic" on one band then it's on Automatic for every band change. I'm hoping someone knows of a way to activate a memory feature on the KAT-500 so that each band can have it's own setting: Auto-Man-Byp. My reason for the "memory" is to eliminate unneeded relay tuning and chatter... as on some bands I simply don't need the KAT-500 and I don't appreciate it trying to tune every antenna that it thinks needs tuning. (as sometimes antennas don't need to be tuned... but the KAT-500 thinks otherwise) Thanks! Dick- K9OM ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Mot an answer, but just a reminder. Elecraft does not use dashes in
their product designations (the only exceptions are the N-Gen and the 2T-Gen mini kits). Yes, we understand when one writes KAT-500, but the real designation is KAT500 (no dash). Leave the 'dash designation' to the other manufacturers. Often that is used to designate an upgrade to an existing product. With Elecraft gear, the equipment can be upgraded with firmware changes and mod kits to the latest level, hence no "dash designations' are required. For instance, there will not be a KAT501 from Elecraft unless the policy changes drastically. As another example, the K3 is not an upgrade for the K2 - it is an entirely different product design. 73, Don W3FPR . On 2/28/2013 12:06 AM, [hidden email] wrote: > Hi Guys, > > > I'm using a KAT-500 and am surprised that when I change bands it doesn't remember whether it was in Automatic or By-Pass the last time it was on that band. If my KAT-500 is set to "Automatic" on one band then it's on Automatic for every band change. I'm hoping someone knows of a way to activate a memory feature on the KAT-500 so that each band can have it's own setting: Auto-Man-Byp. > > > My reason for the "memory" is to eliminate unneeded relay tuning and chatter... as on some bands I simply don't need the KAT-500 and I don't appreciate it trying to tune every antenna that it thinks needs tuning. (as sometimes antennas don't need to be tuned... but the KAT-500 thinks otherwise) > > > Thanks! > > > Dick- K9OM > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by RLVZ
I'll second Dick's request ... was figuring to post the request myself
until I saw him pipe up. I have multiple antennas on some bands, switched outside the shack. They don't need the tuner, but with it on auto their tunes are different enough that I do in fact need to run a tune or manually put the tuner in bypass every time I switch between them. Otherwise I will fault on SWR. Remembering the bypass setting seems an obvious answer. 73 and thanks for listening, Carl WS7L On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:06 PM, <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > > I'm using a KAT-500 and am surprised that when I change bands it doesn't > remember whether it was in Automatic or By-Pass the last time it was on > that band. > > Thanks! > > > Dick- K9OM > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-4
In Washington State, a few decades ago, we had problems with the State putting spaces, and even dashes, in Ham Call license plates.
It took persistence to get them to understand that there are no spaces or dashes in ham calls. In related news, I worked a ham today on CW, and was told that he was using a KX2. I asked for a repeat and he confirmed a KX2. I replied that I understood he said a KX2, without getting any correction from him. Are you guys doing a new rig Beta test that I haven't heard about? This is exciting. A KX2 might be just the rig for me! But, my KX3 is doing everything I could ask for in a rig the size of a medium paperback. Maybe I will wait on the KX2! 73, Rick Dettinger K7MW On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:28 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Mot an answer, but just a reminder. Elecraft does not use dashes in their product designations (the only exceptions are the N-Gen and the 2T-Gen mini kits). > > Yes, we understand when one writes KAT-500, but the real designation is KAT500 (no dash). > Leave the 'dash designation' to the other manufacturers. Often that is used to designate an upgrade to an existing product. With Elecraft gear, the equipment can be upgraded with firmware changes and mod kits to the latest level, hence no "dash designations' are required. For instance, there will not be a KAT501 from Elecraft unless the policy changes drastically. > > As another example, the K3 is not an upgrade for the K2 - it is an entirely different product design. > > 73, > Don W3FPR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by RLVZ
That’s the way it currently works. I.e., when you select AUTO, or MAN or BYP the KAT500 stays that way on all bands. I train my KAT500 on my three antennas on all bands, and then leave it in MAN mode after that. Bypass is a tuning solution when the SWR is low. When in MANual, the KAT500 still recalls the settings and antenna used last on that frequency/band. Works great.
Phil – AD5X “I'm using a KAT-500 and am surprised that when I change bands it doesn't remember whether it was in Automatic or By-Pass the last time it was on that band. If my KAT-500 is set to "Automatic" on one band then it's on Automatic for every band change. I'm hoping someone knows of a way to activate a memory feature on the KAT-500 so that each band can have it's own setting: Auto-Man-Byp.My reason for the "memory" is to eliminate unneeded relay tuning and chatter... as on some bands I simply don't need the KAT-500 and I don't appreciate it trying to tune every antenna that it thinks needs tuning. (as sometimes antennas don't need to be tuned... but the KAT-500 thinks otherwise) Thanks!” ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
When the tuner is in "auto", does it not automatically go into bypass(even though it does not show BYP) if the antenna swr is detected to be below 1.2 to 1?
John N1JM
|
|
In reply to this post by Rick Dettinger-3
The KX2 is popular in my beginners CW class, too.
73, Kent K9ZTV On 2/28/2013 1:24 AM, Rick Dettinger wrote: > In related news, I worked a ham today on CW, and was told that he was using a KX2. I asked for a repeat and he confirmed a KX2. I replied that I understood he said a KX2, without getting any correction from him. Are you guys doing a new rig Beta test that I haven't heard about? This is exciting. A KX2 might be just the rig for me! > But, my KX3 is doing everything I could ask for in a rig the size of a medium paperback. Maybe I will wait on the KX2! > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Administrator
|
Someone makes a "KX-2" antenna tuner, I believe.
There is no Elecraft KX2, real or imagined. Wayne N6KR On Feb 28, 2013, at 8:06 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: > The KX2 is popular in my beginners CW class, too. > > 73, > > Kent K9ZTV > > > On 2/28/2013 1:24 AM, Rick Dettinger wrote: >> In related news, I worked a ham today on CW, and was told that he >> was using a KX2. I asked for a repeat and he confirmed a KX2. I >> replied that I understood he said a KX2, without getting any >> correction from him. Are you guys doing a new rig Beta test that I >> haven't heard about? This is exciting. A KX2 might be just the >> rig for me! >> But, my KX3 is doing everything I could ask for in a rig the size >> of a medium paperback. Maybe I will wait on the KX2! >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
