KAT500 Re-Tuning

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

KAT500 Re-Tuning

Byron Peebles
While working the Willis Island pileup, following the operator on 12
meters as he stepped up for each QSO, I was having to retune the KAT500
every few steps.  Which seemed odd. Once I tuned I was good for only
about 2KHz.  Any thoughts? Antenna has been fine everywhere else.

73, Byron

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Jim Brown-10
On Sat,11/14/2015 1:07 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
> Once I tuned I was good for only about 2KHz.  Any thoughts? Antenna
> has been fine everywhere else.

What's the antenna? From the symptom, I suspect it's nowhere near
resonance on 12m, and the KAT500 is jumping through hoops to get power
into the feedline. And, if the antenna is a poor match to the feedline
(which is why it would need a lot of tuning), the loss in the feedline
is likely to be high.

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Bill Frantz
Not to mention the losses in the tuner itself. My K3 can almost
match on open antenna connection. If I were to transmit, guess
where all the power would go.

73 Bill AE6JV

On 11/14/15 at 2:34 PM, [hidden email] (Jim Brown) wrote:

>On Sat,11/14/2015 1:07 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
>>Once I tuned I was good for only about 2KHz.  Any thoughts?
>>Antenna has been fine everywhere else.
>
>What's the antenna? From the symptom, I suspect it's nowhere
>near resonance on 12m, and the KAT500 is jumping through hoops
>to get power into the feedline. And, if the antenna is a poor
>match to the feedline (which is why it would need a lot of
>tuning), the loss in the feedline is likely to be high.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | Concurrency is hard. 12 out  | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com |                - Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos,
CA 95032

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Byron Peebles
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
M2 Log Periodic flat from bottom to top.

On 11/14/2015 05:34 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Sat,11/14/2015 1:07 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
>> Once I tuned I was good for only about 2KHz.  Any thoughts? Antenna
>> has been fine everywhere else.
>
> What's the antenna? From the symptom, I suspect it's nowhere near
> resonance on 12m, and the KAT500 is jumping through hoops to get power
> into the feedline. And, if the antenna is a poor match to the feedline
> (which is why it would need a lot of tuning), the loss in the feedline
> is likely to be high.

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Byron Peebles
I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's still
solid after all this wind.

On 11/14/2015 11:31 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:

> M2 Log Periodic flat from bottom to top.
>
> On 11/14/2015 05:34 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>> On Sat,11/14/2015 1:07 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
>>> Once I tuned I was good for only about 2KHz.  Any thoughts? Antenna
>>> has been fine everywhere else.
>>
>> What's the antenna? From the symptom, I suspect it's nowhere near
>> resonance on 12m, and the KAT500 is jumping through hoops to get
>> power into the feedline. And, if the antenna is a poor match to the
>> feedline (which is why it would need a lot of tuning), the loss in
>> the feedline is likely to be high.
>
> __

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Jim Brown-10
On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
> I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's
> still solid after all this wind.

Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR
indication is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put
K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune.

Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All
connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers.

Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along
the run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open
connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use
a tissue or paper towel as a probe.

If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any
discontinuities. You should see connectors, the antenna, and any
switching between the antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers
can do TDR. If you don't have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors
to borrow one (and ask them to help you do the measurement).

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Cliff Frescura
Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to have the
KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall.

The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on 40m
SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than 5KHz for
anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna.  Consider that the KAT500
already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution"
doesn't apply.  Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning since
the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX.

Here is how it would work:

1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on...
        a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune
(under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time after
this split transition
2. When split is on (Split mode)
        b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of
frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings.
        c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in order
to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel.
3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then go into
"normal" (non Split) mode.

The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise antenna.  If
the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't even engage it.  In
my specific situation there is also at KPA500 connected, so the way that the
KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it
retunes/recalls.  Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged
initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile.  On very rare
occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault.  While probably not an issue, the
amount of relay chatter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX
transitions is a bit unsettling.

73,

Cliff K3LL


-----Original Message-----
From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
> I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's
> still solid after all this wind.

Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR indication
is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put
K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune.

Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All
connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers.

Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along the
run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open
connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use a
tissue or paper towel as a probe.

If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities.
You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the
antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers can do TDR. If you don't
have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors to borrow one (and ask them
to help you do the measurement).

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to [hidden email]




______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Cady, Fred-2
Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions when operating split?  At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for its solution according to:

MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014

* FSK-D (RTTY) POWER-CONTROL BUG FIX: Power output can now be increased while in transmit mode when using FSK-D.

* KAT500 ATU SUPPORT: Automatic retuning of KAT500 LC network as K3 VFO is moved. VFO frequency messages are sent via the auxBus. Sends VFO A frequency except in SPLIT mode, where VFO B frequency is sent.

Cheers,
Fred KE7X
www.ke7x.com for all KE7X Elecraft books.
________________________________________
From: Elecraft <[hidden email]> on behalf of Cliff Frescura <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to have the
KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall.

The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on 40m
SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than 5KHz for
anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna.  Consider that the KAT500
already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution"
doesn't apply.  Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning since
the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX.

Here is how it would work:

1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on...
        a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune
(under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time after
this split transition
2. When split is on (Split mode)
        b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of
frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings.
        c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in order
to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel.
3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then go into
"normal" (non Split) mode.

The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise antenna.  If
the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't even engage it.  In
my specific situation there is also at KPA500 connected, so the way that the
KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it
retunes/recalls.  Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged
initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile.  On very rare
occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault.  While probably not an issue, the
amount of relay chatter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX
transitions is a bit unsettling.

73,

Cliff K3LL


-----Original Message-----
From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
> I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's
> still solid after all this wind.

Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR indication
is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put
K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune.

Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All
connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers.

Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along the
run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open
connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use a
tissue or paper towel as a probe.

If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities.
You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the
antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers can do TDR. If you don't
have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors to borrow one (and ask them
to help you do the measurement).

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to [hidden email]




______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Cliff Frescura
Apparently yes.  However, I'm using the KAT500 serial port to communicate
frequency to the KAT500 via logging software (DXLabs), not auxBus, since the
radio is not a K3/S.

73,

Cliff K3LL

-----Original Message-----
From: Cady, Fred [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:28 PM
To: Cliff Frescura; [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions when
operating split?  At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for its solution
according to:

MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014

* FSK-D (RTTY) POWER-CONTROL BUG FIX: Power output can now be increased
while in transmit mode when using FSK-D.

* KAT500 ATU SUPPORT: Automatic retuning of KAT500 LC network as K3 VFO is
moved. VFO frequency messages are sent via the auxBus. Sends VFO A frequency
except in SPLIT mode, where VFO B frequency is sent.

Cheers,
Fred KE7X
www.ke7x.com for all KE7X Elecraft books.
________________________________________
From: Elecraft <[hidden email]> on behalf of Cliff
Frescura <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to have the
KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall.

The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on 40m
SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than 5KHz for
anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna.  Consider that the KAT500
already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution"
doesn't apply.  Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning since
the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX.

Here is how it would work:

1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on...
        a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune
(under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time after
this split transition 2. When split is on (Split mode)
        b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of
frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings.
        c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in order
to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel.
3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then go into
"normal" (non Split) mode.

The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise antenna.  If
the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't even engage it.  In
my specific situation there is also at KPA500 connected, so the way that the
KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it
retunes/recalls.  Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged
initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile.  On very rare
occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault.  While probably not an issue, the
amount of relay chatter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX
transitions is a bit unsettling.

73,

Cliff K3LL


-----Original Message-----
From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
> I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's
> still solid after all this wind.

Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR indication
is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put
K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune.

Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All
connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers.

Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along the
run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open
connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use a
tissue or paper towel as a probe.

If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities.
You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the
antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers can do TDR. If you don't
have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors to borrow one (and ask them
to help you do the measurement).

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to [hidden email]




______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to [hidden email]





______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Cliff Frescura
In reply to this post by Cady, Fred-2
I went back and reviewed the KAT500 command set and it doesn't look like
this is possible because the serial protocol does not have a way to
communicate split status.  I've been knee deep in the KPA500 serial protocol
(with great results thanks to Jack W6FB) and thought they may have some high
level similarities, but not really.

Do you know how the KAT500 interprets frequency, if driving only the band
data lines (BAND0-3) via an external TTL device?  Does it pick middle of the
band if there is no last used frequency?

73,

Cliff K3LL

-----Original Message-----
From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:58 PM
To: 'Cady, Fred'; '[hidden email]'
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

Apparently yes.  However, I'm using the KAT500 serial port to communicate
frequency to the KAT500 via logging software (DXLabs), not auxBus, since the
radio is not a K3/S.

73,

Cliff K3LL

-----Original Message-----
From: Cady, Fred [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:28 PM
To: Cliff Frescura; [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions when
operating split?  At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for its solution
according to:

MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014

* FSK-D (RTTY) POWER-CONTROL BUG FIX: Power output can now be increased
while in transmit mode when using FSK-D.

* KAT500 ATU SUPPORT: Automatic retuning of KAT500 LC network as K3 VFO is
moved. VFO frequency messages are sent via the auxBus. Sends VFO A frequency
except in SPLIT mode, where VFO B frequency is sent.

Cheers,
Fred KE7X
www.ke7x.com for all KE7X Elecraft books.
________________________________________
From: Elecraft <[hidden email]> on behalf of Cliff
Frescura <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to have the
KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall.

The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on 40m
SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than 5KHz for
anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna.  Consider that the KAT500
already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution"
doesn't apply.  Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning since
the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX.

Here is how it would work:

1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on...
        a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune
(under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time after
this split transition 2. When split is on (Split mode)
        b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of
frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings.
        c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in order
to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel.
3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then go into
"normal" (non Split) mode.

The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise antenna.  If
the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't even engage it.  In
my specific situation there is also at KPA500 connected, so the way that the
KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it
retunes/recalls.  Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged
initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile.  On very rare
occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault.  While probably not an issue, the
amount of relay chatter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX
transitions is a bit unsettling.

73,

Cliff K3LL


-----Original Message-----
From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
> I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's
> still solid after all this wind.

Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR indication
is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put
K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune.

Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All
connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers.

Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along the
run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open
connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use a
tissue or paper towel as a probe.

If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities.
You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the
antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers can do TDR. If you don't
have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors to borrow one (and ask them
to help you do the measurement).

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to [hidden email]




______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to [hidden email]





______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Dick Dievendorff-4
If the band lines are used only, the ATU picks a mid band freq if there is no history since last ATU power up.  On first tx after that, it performs a memory recall tune using the counted freq.

Power up means DC power applied.

A k3 can provide approx freq on RX thru the ACC cable, depending on a menu setting

Dick, K6KR

> On Nov 15, 2015, at 16:20, Cliff Frescura <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I went back and reviewed the KAT500 command set and it doesn't look like
> this is possible because the serial protocol does not have a way to
> communicate split status.  I've been knee deep in the KPA500 serial protocol
> (with great results thanks to Jack W6FB) and thought they may have some high
> level similarities, but not really.
>
> Do you know how the KAT500 interprets frequency, if driving only the band
> data lines (BAND0-3) via an external TTL device?  Does it pick middle of the
> band if there is no last used frequency?
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:58 PM
> To: 'Cady, Fred'; '[hidden email]'
> Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
>
> Apparently yes.  However, I'm using the KAT500 serial port to communicate
> frequency to the KAT500 via logging software (DXLabs), not auxBus, since the
> radio is not a K3/S.
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cady, Fred [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:28 PM
> To: Cliff Frescura; [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
>
> Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions when
> operating split?  At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for its solution
> according to:
>
> MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014
>
> * FSK-D (RTTY) POWER-CONTROL BUG FIX: Power output can now be increased
> while in transmit mode when using FSK-D.
>
> * KAT500 ATU SUPPORT: Automatic retuning of KAT500 LC network as K3 VFO is
> moved. VFO frequency messages are sent via the auxBus. Sends VFO A frequency
> except in SPLIT mode, where VFO B frequency is sent.
>
> Cheers,
> Fred KE7X
> www.ke7x.com for all KE7X Elecraft books.
> ________________________________________
> From: Elecraft <[hidden email]> on behalf of Cliff
> Frescura <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
>
> Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to have the
> KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall.
>
> The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on 40m
> SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than 5KHz for
> anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna.  Consider that the KAT500
> already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna solution"
> doesn't apply.  Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning since
> the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX.
>
> Here is how it would work:
>
> 1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on...
>        a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune
> (under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time after
> this split transition 2. When split is on (Split mode)
>        b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of
> frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings.
>        c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in order
> to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel.
> 3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then go into
> "normal" (non Split) mode.
>
> The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise antenna.  If
> the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't even engage it.  In
> my specific situation there is also at KPA500 connected, so the way that the
> KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it
> retunes/recalls.  Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged
> initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile.  On very rare
> occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault.  While probably not an issue, the
> amount of relay chatter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX
> transitions is a bit unsettling.
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim
> Brown
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
>
>> On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
>> I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's
>> still solid after all this wind.
>
> Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR indication
> is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put
> K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune.
>
> Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All
> connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers.
>
> Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along the
> run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point. Open
> connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is to use a
> tissue or paper towel as a probe.
>
> If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities.
> You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the
> antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers can do TDR. If you don't
> have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors to borrow one (and ask them
> to help you do the measurement).
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
> delivered to [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
> delivered to [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500 Re-Tuning

Cliff Frescura
Thanks -this is helpful information.  If going the hardware route, I am
inclined to implement the logic via an RS-232 wedge device vs implementing a
BAND0-3 device (basically an antenna switch).

73,

Cliff K3LL/6

-----Original Message-----
From: Dick Dievendorff [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 9:36 PM
To: Cliff Frescura
Cc: Cady, Fred; [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning

If the band lines are used only, the ATU picks a mid band freq if there is
no history since last ATU power up.  On first tx after that, it performs a
memory recall tune using the counted freq.

Power up means DC power applied.

A k3 can provide approx freq on RX thru the ACC cable, depending on a menu
setting

Dick, K6KR

> On Nov 15, 2015, at 16:20, Cliff Frescura <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I went back and reviewed the KAT500 command set and it doesn't look
> like this is possible because the serial protocol does not have a way
> to communicate split status.  I've been knee deep in the KPA500 serial
> protocol (with great results thanks to Jack W6FB) and thought they may
> have some high level similarities, but not really.
>
> Do you know how the KAT500 interprets frequency, if driving only the
> band data lines (BAND0-3) via an external TTL device?  Does it pick
> middle of the band if there is no last used frequency?
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:58 PM
> To: 'Cady, Fred'; '[hidden email]'
> Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
>
> Apparently yes.  However, I'm using the KAT500 serial port to
> communicate frequency to the KAT500 via logging software (DXLabs), not
> auxBus, since the radio is not a K3/S.
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cady, Fred [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:28 PM
> To: Cliff Frescura; [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
>
> Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions
> when operating split?  At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for
> its solution according to:
>
> MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014
>
> * FSK-D (RTTY) POWER-CONTROL BUG FIX: Power output can now be
> increased while in transmit mode when using FSK-D.
>
> * KAT500 ATU SUPPORT: Automatic retuning of KAT500 LC network as K3
> VFO is moved. VFO frequency messages are sent via the auxBus. Sends
> VFO A frequency except in SPLIT mode, where VFO B frequency is sent.
>
> Cheers,
> Fred KE7X
> www.ke7x.com for all KE7X Elecraft books.
> ________________________________________
> From: Elecraft <[hidden email]> on behalf of Cliff
> Frescura <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
>
> Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a valid reason to
> have the
> KAT500 recognize split and inhibit retuning/recall.
>
> The need for this functionality is very apparent when running split on
> 40m SSB when the DX is below 7.1 MHz and listening up much higher than
> 5KHz for anyone using a narrow bandwidth 40m antenna.  Consider that
> the KAT500 already tuned the antenna on your TX, so the "fix the antenna
solution"

> doesn't apply.  Listening ~50KHz away should not require any retuning
> since the tuner's settings at your TX should be good enough for RX.
>
> Here is how it would work:
>
> 1. When the KAT500 sees a *transition* from split off to split on...
>        a. The KAT500 would recall settings for TX Frequency or retune
> (under the VSWR settings condition) when it sees RF for the first time
> after this split transition 2. When split is on (Split mode)
>        b. The tuner should not change any settings regardless of
> frequency/band - except under VSWR conditions based on settings.
>        c. Perhaps both the "Auto" and "Man" indicators would be on in
> order to indicate this mode on the KAT front panel.
> 3. When the KAT500 sees a transition from split on to split off then
> go into "normal" (non Split) mode.
>
> The main reason I am using the tuner is because of a compromise
> antenna.  If the antenna was flat enough across the band I wouldn't
> even engage it.  In my specific situation there is also at KPA500
> connected, so the way that the
> KAT500 works today will result in the KAT inhibiting the KPA while it
> retunes/recalls.  Although fast, I suspect that the amp is not engaged
> initially when I send (speak) my call sign in the pile.  On very rare
> occasions there is also a KPA VSWR Fault.  While probably not an
> issue, the amount of relay chatter in very short period of time
> between fast RX/TX/RX transitions is a bit unsettling.
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Jim Brown
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
>
>> On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
>> I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's
>> still solid after all this wind.
>
> Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR
> indication is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put
> K3 in TUN mode) and let it tune.
>
> Carefully check the entire coax path between K3 and the antenna. All
> connectors should be finger tight, then tighten with gas pliers.
>
> Any indication that the coax is wet? Moisture entering anywhere along
> the run will usually migrate all the way down to the lowest point.
> Open connectors to see if there's any moisture. A good way to test is
> to use a tissue or paper towel as a probe.
>
> If you have TDR capability, look at the feedline for any discontinuities.
> You should see connectors, the antenna, and any switching between the
> antenna and your test point. Most vector analyzers can do TDR. If you
> don't have one of them, ask around your ham neighbors to borrow one
> (and ask them to help you do the measurement).
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to
> [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to
> [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to
> [hidden email]




______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]