KAT500 - ...and a long wire inverted "L"

[Oscar, WB5GCX]

Although I'm not very good with antenna theory, I've enjoyed reading the
discussions of where what type balun should go, or not go, etc. in the
KAT500 discussions.   I still don't know how I would go about connecting my
current antenna to a KPA500, so I thought perhaps some of you would have
some input.  Here's my situation/configuration:
  - Due to convenant restrictions, I am limited to a long wire (about 170')
in an inverted "L" configuration (stealth situation)
  - Antenna feed point and ground/radial system feed point are together and
about 50' from my K3/P3 location
  - Currently using an SGC-230 remote antenna coupler at the antenna feed
point, with good quality 50 ohm coax coming into the house
This configuration is working admirably on 160 through 10 meters.  My
original thinking on this configuration was having the tuner/coupler at the
antenna feed point would help 1) keep stray RF away from the shack, and 2)
minimize any feedline loss.  However, with the 230, I'm limited to about 60
watts cw, and 200 watts ssb.  Obviously, no KPA500 under my Christmas tree.


I initially was thinking there would be two versions of the KAT500, one
model for indoor use, then another for remote/outdoor use.  I could then
replace the 230 with the remote KPA500 and then be free to purchase my
KPA500.  However, it appears a remote version of the tuner may be awhile
coming.

The question I keep asking myself is:  Could I use the "shack" version of
the KAT500 with my current antenna, and, if so, how would one hook
everything together?  Balun (1:1, 4:1, choke), or no balun? Coax, I assume
would still be OK, but obviously would be higher voltages and a little
power loss (but still probably OK at HF frequencies).  Or, given the
inverted "L"has to remain my antenna, is there still significant advantage
to having the tuner at the antenna feedpoint - and I should simply wait
awhile longer and see if there will be a "remote" version of the tuner?

I love this reflector and Elecraft.

Oscar, WB5GCX
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Rick Dettinger-3]

I moved my inverted "L", a 176 foot long, 55 foot high wire in the  
trees, from my shack to a post with an SGC 230 tuner about 100 feet  
away from the shack.  The noise level on receive went down about 3 S  
units.  I live in a quiet, rural location, and, as a side benefit, the  
antenna is no longer visible.  Its located just into a wooded area and  
the neighbors and XYL are happy, too.  Only problem is, with a total  
of 140 feet of coax, it requires more than QRP power to tune, on some  
bands.  The SGC 230 requires 3 watts, but the loses on an untuned line  
are great enough that I can't use my K1 on 15 meters.  The KX3 should  
have enough power to tune on all bands.
Another possibility would be to use a remotely tuned network for each  
band to get the SWR close, and do the final tuning in the shack.

73,
Rick Dettinger   K7MW






> I have an inverted L myself, and have often thought of adding the  
> SGC230 to
> allow me to have a feed point farther from the 'shack'.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Ron AC7AC
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html