|
Hi all,
I apologize if this is a little bit OT, but it isn't really. My remote KAT500 is currently maxed out with a G5RV and two resonant dipoles for 10m and 15m (all working great). I am looking for an easy way to add my 80m resonant dipole to the mix and have decided that building a diplexer that would enable me to share one port for the 10m and 80m antennas should be an easy way to accomplish this. Design programs for these are easy to find and basically tell me that I need two inductors about 1.1-1.2uH. What toroid core should I choose for bulding an efficient inductor like this that would handle at least 500W on 3.8MHz and 28.5MHz? AB2TC - Knut |
|
Either T130-6 or T130-2 should do nicely.
73, Bob, N6CM On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:22 PM, ab2tc <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I apologize if this is a little bit OT, but it isn't really. My remote > KAT500 is currently maxed out with a G5RV and two resonant dipoles for 10m > and 15m (all working great). I am looking for an easy way to add my 80m > resonant dipole to the mix and have decided that building a diplexer that > would enable me to share one port for the 10m and 80m antennas should be an > easy way to accomplish this. Design programs for these are easy to find and > basically tell me that I need two inductors about 1.1-1.2uH. What toroid > core should I choose for bulding an efficient inductor like this that would > handle at least 500W on 3.8MHz and 28.5MHz? > > AB2TC - Knut > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KAT500-more-antennas-tp7568845.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by ab2tc
Knut,
The easy way is to add two wires for 80 meters to either of the resonant dipoles (using the same coax). If you orient the 80 meter antenna wires at right angles to the existing antenna, there will be no interaction. If you cannot get them at right angles, then separate the wires as much as you can and re-tune the higher frequency antenna. I run 3 such "fan dipoles" here. One for 80 and 40, another for 20, 15, and 10, and yet another for 30, 17 and 12 meters. The 80 and 40 meter antennas are inverted Vee while the others are straight dipoles. The 80 and 40 wires are at right angles while the wires for the others are separated by about a foot - PVC is used for the spacers. 73, Don W3FPR On 1/17/2013 5:22 PM, ab2tc wrote: > Hi all, > > I apologize if this is a little bit OT, but it isn't really. My remote > KAT500 is currently maxed out with a G5RV and two resonant dipoles for 10m > and 15m (all working great). I am looking for an easy way to add my 80m > resonant dipole to the mix and have decided that building a diplexer that > would enable me to share one port for the 10m and 80m antennas should be an > easy way to accomplish this. Design programs for these are easy to find and > basically tell me that I need two inductors about 1.1-1.2uH. What toroid > core should I choose for bulding an efficient inductor like this that would > handle at least 500W on 3.8MHz and 28.5MHz? > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
I use my Carolina Windom on port one (KAT 500 matches
80,60,40,20,17,15,10), 20 M beam on port two, and another set of antennas on a remote switch on port 3. Whatever antenna I choose on that switch (80 M sloper, 40 M sloper or 20 M sloper) the KAT finds the right match for the right band (if I switch to the right antenna). The system is great and the tuner is flawless. So you can use the same antenna to match different bands if it is matchable. Bob K7VO On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Don Wilhelm <[hidden email]> wrote: > Knut, > > The easy way is to add two wires for 80 meters to either of the resonant > dipoles (using the same coax). If you orient the 80 meter antenna wires at > right angles to the existing antenna, there will be no interaction. If you > cannot get them at right angles, then separate the wires as much as you can > and re-tune the higher frequency antenna. > > I run 3 such "fan dipoles" here. One for 80 and 40, another for 20, 15, > and 10, and yet another for 30, 17 and 12 meters. The 80 and 40 meter > antennas are inverted Vee while the others are straight dipoles. The 80 > and 40 wires are at right angles while the wires for the others are > separated by about a foot - PVC is used for the spacers. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 1/17/2013 5:22 PM, ab2tc wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I apologize if this is a little bit OT, but it isn't really. My remote >> KAT500 is currently maxed out with a G5RV and two resonant dipoles for 10m >> and 15m (all working great). I am looking for an easy way to add my 80m >> resonant dipole to the mix and have decided that building a diplexer that >> would enable me to share one port for the 10m and 80m antennas should be >> an >> easy way to accomplish this. Design programs for these are easy to find >> and >> basically tell me that I need two inductors about 1.1-1.2uH. What toroid >> core should I choose for bulding an efficient inductor like this that >> would >> handle at least 500W on 3.8MHz and 28.5MHz? >> >> > ______________________________**______________________________**__ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/elecraft<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htm<http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> > Post: mailto:[hidden email].**net <[hidden email]> > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Robert Sands
K7VO Olympia, WA |
|
In reply to this post by ab2tc
I have a similar 80/40m inverted-V where my wires are separated by
1/2-inch painted wooden dowel about 8-inch long and spaced about every two feet. The Balun is rated for a kw but I do not run more than 300w. Center is held at 40-feet by my tower#2 and ends are at 22-feet held by a run of nylon cord to a 10m J-pole (24-foot tall) and my 25-foot high 6m yagi support mast. Works excellently on upper 80m without tuner and uses a little tuning assistance to work all of 40m. I originally tuned the 80m wires to 3920 and then adjusted 40m to 7240 using a MFJ269B analyzer. The 40m section is bit narrow band so the tuner allows use down on 7093 for a local SSB Net (allowed in AK). I can work anywhere in AK on 80m with this and outside to west coast when bands open (note that Alaska stretches over 2.000 miles from the tip of the Aleutians to the Canadian border). I can sit on 4125 and receive the main marine USB channel regularly out to 1,000 miles. I have run my K3/10 at 12w often on 80m with this antenna and gets out very nicely...folks are surprised it is only 12w (KX3 works equally well). 73, Ed - KL7UW ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
