KAT500

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

KAT500

Jack Satterfield
I am trying to tune a G5Rv on 4.7xx (MARS freq) best I can get with the
KAT500 is 2.65 swr,  which means cannot use the KPA500.

Using the K3 barefoot with ATU it tunes to 1.0 swr

Why is there such a big difference in performance?

Jack

W4GRJ

 

 

                         

 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KAT500

Nr4c
First, chk antenna system.  Shouldn't be that different.

Also, what does KAT500 Utility say about the tune results?

...bill nr4c

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Jack Satterfield <[hidden email]> wrote:

>I am trying to tune a G5Rv on 4.7xx (MARS freq) best I can get with the
>KAT500 is 2.65 swr,  which means cannot use the KPA500.
>
>Using the K3 barefoot with ATU it tunes to 1.0 swr
>
>Why is there such a big difference in performance?
>
>Jack
>
>W4GRJ
>
>
>
>
>
>                        
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html