Is this a typo?
Wes N7WS On 8/31/2019 7:45 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > > K6XX, one of the Elecraft engineers who works on their power amps, gave a talk > to our contest club stressing the importance of providing a matched load to > the output devices, and to the output itself. He observed distortion > *increases* significantly when that condition is satisfied, whether it is an > antenna tuner for a solid state output stage or the Pi or Pi-L in a tube amp. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Yes. :) The missing word is "NOT" satisfied.
73, Jim On 9/1/2019 5:14 AM, Wes wrote: > Is this a typo? > > Wes N7WS > > On 8/31/2019 7:45 PM, Jim Brown wrote: >> >> K6XX, one of the Elecraft engineers who works on their power amps, >> gave a talk to our contest club stressing the importance of providing >> a matched load to the output devices, and to the output itself. He >> observed distortion *increases* significantly when that condition is >> satisfied, whether it is an antenna tuner for a solid state output >> stage or the Pi or Pi-L in a tube amp. > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
> On 8/31/2019 6:02 PM, Roger D Johnson wrote: > >> >> Isn't this exactly the way some of the first ham linears were designed >> for an input of 2000 watts in SSB and 1000 watts in CW? There >> was a switch on the front panel for SSB/CW mode which dropped >> the plate voltage for CW mode so that the tubes saw the same >> load impedance they did in SSB mode thereby keeping the efficiency >> high and not requiring retuning between modes. I think it was more to make it harder to exceed 1 kW input on CW. It is almost always possible to load an amplifier (with the usual PI network) for efficient operation at less than maximum output. It just has to be loaded lightly and not driven too hard. That conflicts, however, with the usual procedure of loading for maximum output. Also, with two plate voltage settings you could usually tune for maximum output at the low setting at about 1 kW input, and it would be tuned about right for 2 kW at the high setting. This reduced the stress during tuning, and probably was the most common strictly legal way to tune for 2 kW PEP input in those days. Actually, legally tuning for 2 kW input in those days was tricky. Collins used a bridge which compared RF input and output voltages and allowed tuning at low power. I used that circuit in an amplifier I built about 50 years ago, and it worked pretty well. A PI network in a tube amplifier allows properly loading the amplifier into a range of load impedances, but the operator or autotuner is looking at grid current, plate current, input/output voltage ratios, etc. to get the tuning right. This sets the tuning for efficient, linear operation. A solid state amplifier and ATU work very differently. The amplifier is designed to operate properly into a 50 Ohm resistive load, and the job of the ATU is to make the actual load as close to that as possible. One result of that is that a rather small mismatch can have a large effect on efficiency and/or linearity. 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott K9MA [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
FWIW, one of the things I like best about my KPA-1500 is that you can
use its antenna tuner with the amp on Standby 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. On 9/1/2019 4:02 PM, K9MA wrote: > >> On 8/31/2019 6:02 PM, Roger D Johnson wrote: >> >>> >>> Isn't this exactly the way some of the first ham linears were designed >>> for an input of 2000 watts in SSB and 1000 watts in CW? There >>> was a switch on the front panel for SSB/CW mode which dropped >>> the plate voltage for CW mode so that the tubes saw the same >>> load impedance they did in SSB mode thereby keeping the efficiency >>> high and not requiring retuning between modes. > > I think it was more to make it harder to exceed 1 kW input on CW. It > is almost always possible to load an amplifier (with the usual PI > network) for efficient operation at less than maximum output. It just > has to be loaded lightly and not driven too hard. That conflicts, > however, with the usual procedure of loading for maximum output. Also, > with two plate voltage settings you could usually tune for maximum > output at the low setting at about 1 kW input, and it would be tuned > about right for 2 kW at the high setting. This reduced the stress > during tuning, and probably was the most common strictly legal way to > tune for 2 kW PEP input in those days. > > Actually, legally tuning for 2 kW input in those days was tricky. > Collins used a bridge which compared RF input and output voltages and > allowed tuning at low power. I used that circuit in an amplifier I > built about 50 years ago, and it worked pretty well. > > A PI network in a tube amplifier allows properly loading the amplifier > into a range of load impedances, but the operator or autotuner is > looking at grid current, plate current, input/output voltage ratios, > etc. to get the tuning right. This sets the tuning for efficient, > linear operation. A solid state amplifier and ATU work very > differently. The amplifier is designed to operate properly into a 50 > Ohm resistive load, and the job of the ATU is to make the actual load > as close to that as possible. One result of that is that a rather > small mismatch can have a large effect on efficiency and/or linearity. > > > 73, > > Scott K9MA > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by N4ZR
Never realized that, but I checked dc input power vs output RF power
on my LDMOS amps and that appears to be true. I had intended to run my 2m 1500w amp at 600w for SSB (to be kinder and more linear), while running JT65 at 1300w which is where saturation begins. 1385w RF: 37A x 47.2V = 1746w (disp = 361w) 600w RF: 25A x 48.5V = 1212w (disp = 612w) http://www.kl7uw.com/test2.pdf MRF-1K50N disp = 2941w at 25c (derate above 25c) https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/MRF1K50N.pdf But average current draw in SSB is less than JT65 (which is keydown carrier). So I guess it depends on how long-winded your SSB talking is. Typically voice duty cycle is 20% at max whereas JT65 is 50/120 seconds = 42% Fortunately, I have a thermistor on the RF deck to monitor temperature with a digital voltmeter. Control board illuminates "overtemp" lamp at 43c and 50v is shutdown at 55c. Extended running of JT65 shows heatsink is a shade under 43c (lots of fans cooling things). http://www.kl7uw.com/144_1500W_PA.htm 73, Ed - KL7UW Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:04:38 -0500 From: K9MA <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 on digital modes This is nothing unique to the KPA1500: ALL class AB amplifiers behave this way. Even an "ideal" class AB amplifier has a maximum dissipation at around half of full output. One thing running at lower output probably will buy you is lower IMD. 73, Scott K9MA 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com Dubus-NA Business mail: [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |