KPA500 Inhibit Line

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

KPA500 Inhibit Line

j-meister
Setup is Yaesu FTDX3000 xcvr --> Elecraft KPA500 amp --> LDG AT1000ProII tuner. I am using a cable
between the FTDX3000 and KPA500 to transfer band data and the key line (KPA500 Aux Pin 10). I would
like to use the open-collector interface on the AT1000 (which is pulled low during tuning) to pull
the KPA500 Inhibit (Aux Pin 11) line low so that I am not running high power into the tuner during
tuning. (Note: I will also at the same time use the open-collector output to pull the correct line of the
FTDX3000 low to enter the low power CW key-down mode.)

Any "gotchas" with this scheme? The KPA500 will be keyed up via Aux pin 10 at the same time it will
be inhibited via Aux pin 11. Is there a delay I have to be worried about? Is there an order of the
pull-downs that matters? Am I going to get a few msec bump of high power?

I realize that one normally interrupts the amp via the key line, but it seems a little more straightforward
in my particular case to do it via the inhibit line.

Jim, K2WU

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KPA500 Inhibit Line

Jim Brown-10
On Fri,3/20/2015 6:14 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
> I realize that one normally interrupts the amp via the key line, but it seems a little more straightforward
> in my particular case to do it via the inhibit line.

I think you're doing it the hard way, Jim. The KPA500 senses RF very
quickly, so you don't need to feed it band data. A dit or a tap on the
mic is enough. I would do only whatever switching you need to protect
the tuner. If the tuner has a "loop-through" interrupt relay for the amp
key line, I would use that. If it doesn't, go ahead and use the inhibit
on the KPA.

Also, the KPA500 drives to full power with about 30W, so that should be
your usual power out setting for the FT3000, except on 30M, where 12W is
about right. Most auto tuners are happy with those drive levels.

73, Jim K9YC


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KPA500 Inhibit Line

Jack Brindle-2
In reply to this post by j-meister
This actually should work. The #INHIBIT signal will disable transmission rather quickly, at least as fast as the key line.
The catch is that most tuners don’t detect high SWR and output their tune signal all that fast. In fact most use a relay,
adding 7-10 mSec of time to the overall time. You will probably end up with something like 15 to 20 mSec of
delay between key down and disabling of amplification. Cutting that down as much as possible is generally a good thing.

Now having said all this, this is exactly the problem that #INHIBIT is meant to solve. #INHIBIT is the fastest way to
disable amplification, causing the proper TR switching sequence along the way, exactly the same way the negating the
KEY line does. The general discussion above of reducing the ATU’s HI SWR / fault detection is important in that you
want to reduce the time the amplifier is subject to the bad conditions. We took great lengths to reduce this time using
the KEY line using the KAT500, unfortunately most ATU manufacturers don’t take quite as much care in this area.

So, the answer to your question is yes, you will get sever mSec of high power, something like 10 to 20 mSec.

Let us know how your experiments come out.

- Jack Brindle, W6FB
Elecraft Engineering


> On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:14 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
>
> Setup is Yaesu FTDX3000 xcvr --> Elecraft KPA500 amp --> LDG AT1000ProII tuner. I am using a cable
> between the FTDX3000 and KPA500 to transfer band data and the key line (KPA500 Aux Pin 10). I would
> like to use the open-collector interface on the AT1000 (which is pulled low during tuning) to pull
> the KPA500 Inhibit (Aux Pin 11) line low so that I am not running high power into the tuner during
> tuning. (Note: I will also at the same time use the open-collector output to pull the correct line of the
> FTDX3000 low to enter the low power CW key-down mode.)
>
> Any "gotchas" with this scheme? The KPA500 will be keyed up via Aux pin 10 at the same time it will
> be inhibited via Aux pin 11. Is there a delay I have to be worried about? Is there an order of the
> pull-downs that matters? Am I going to get a few msec bump of high power?
>
> I realize that one normally interrupts the amp via the key line, but it seems a little more straightforward
> in my particular case to do it via the inhibit line.
>
> Jim, K2WU
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]