|
Well, if you want a kilowatt station the Icom IC-7600 and PW-1 offer the
same functionality with a built-in antenna matching circuit. Curiously, I am getting about 400 watts out of the PW-1 driving it directly with the KX3 at 12 watts out (no ALC). 73, Charlie k3ICH ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill W2BLC" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:14 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question > Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated (no tuning or knob > twisting) 500 Watt HF station. Last time I saw that was a Halicrafters > Tornado. > > I changed my entire radio desk to create more storage and shelves from the > space formerly used by a large tube amp and the large tuner I used with > it. The K3 and P3 take about the same space the previous HF rig took and > the KPA500 and KAT500 take just slightly more space than the K3 by itself. > In other words, the K-Line is extremely space efficient. > > Bill K-Line > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by W2RMS
I don¹t know what the design rationale was, but I do know why I went that way after looking at KW and 1.5 KW amps from several other manufacturers. Pretty simple - I can run the KPA500 and the K3 from existing 117 vac power in my home. A KW would require either a dedicated 220 line or an increase in my fire insurance coverage. The on-the-air signal gain from 500 to 1000 isn¹t very much . . . cheaper to put another few DB into the antenna system. Having decided that 500 was the right size, choosing Elecraft wasn¹t even in doubt due to the integration of the equipment, among other things. Ted, KN1CBR > >Message: 3 >Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 08:06:42 -0400 >From: Slava Baytalskiy <[hidden email]> >To: elecraft <[hidden email]> >Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 question >Message-ID: <[hidden email]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >Hello everyone! >I'm a proud owner of a new K3/P3. >Almost there... >Can someone please explain to me the rationale behind the KPA500? Why >500W? >Is there a tremendous difference between legal limit and about half of it >(which is what i hear KPA500 can do)? >I understand the ease of use, how the amp follows the radio. I get all >that. But why half of max power? >Chances are i won't be buying any more amps for the foreseeable future if >i get the KPA500 at Dayton this year, so i'd like to know that it will >cover everything i need it to (and i have no idea what that might be). > >I hope this question isn't too confusing. >I'm a new ham (almost a year new), so please be gentle. >Thanks in advance! >__________________ >Slava (Sal) B, W2RMS >[hidden email] > > >> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
I found that the K-Line set-up (K3, P3, KAT500, and KPA500) fit very nicely
into my RV-turned-shack. You can see my operating position in the top picture on my QRZ.com page (click to enlarge). After replacement of a board "sandwich" early in its life, my KPA has functioned perfectly, and usually gets me through the pileups I want to work. I usually run it at about 400w, and find many other KPA users do about the same. -Paul, N1HEL On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Dauer, Edward <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I don¹t know what the design rationale was, but I do know why I went that > way after looking at KW and 1.5 KW amps from several other manufacturers. > Pretty simple - I can run the KPA500 and the K3 from existing 117 vac > power in my home. A KW would require either a dedicated 220 line or an > increase in my fire insurance coverage. The on-the-air signal gain from > 500 to 1000 isn¹t very much . . . cheaper to put another few DB into the > antenna system. Having decided that 500 was the right size, choosing > Elecraft wasn¹t even in doubt due to the integration of the equipment, > among other things. > > > Ted, KN1CBR > > > > > >Message: 3 > >Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 08:06:42 -0400 > >From: Slava Baytalskiy <[hidden email]> > >To: elecraft <[hidden email]> > >Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 question > >Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > >Hello everyone! > >I'm a proud owner of a new K3/P3. > >Almost there... > >Can someone please explain to me the rationale behind the KPA500? Why > >500W? > >Is there a tremendous difference between legal limit and about half of it > >(which is what i hear KPA500 can do)? > >I understand the ease of use, how the amp follows the radio. I get all > >that. But why half of max power? > >Chances are i won't be buying any more amps for the foreseeable future if > >i get the KPA500 at Dayton this year, so i'd like to know that it will > >cover everything i need it to (and i have no idea what that might be). > > > >I hope this question isn't too confusing. > >I'm a new ham (almost a year new), so please be gentle. > >Thanks in advance! > >__________________ > >Slava (Sal) B, W2RMS > >[hidden email] > > > > > >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > -- Paul Grigorieff N1HEL 781-526-1911 Half Moon Bay, CA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Charlie T, K3ICH
I just added the KPA500 and the KAT500 last month - first amp I've ever had but so cannot compare but love it!
Issue for me was ability to run on 120 volts. Great fun to assemble both and as mentioned nice compact grouping / size for my space constraints. Joe, w9jc On May 7, 2014, at 6:10 PM, Charlie T, K3ICH wrote: > Well, if you want a kilowatt station the Icom IC-7600 and PW-1 offer the same functionality with a built-in antenna matching circuit. > > Curiously, I am getting about 400 watts out of the PW-1 driving it directly with the KX3 at 12 watts out (no ALC). > > 73, Charlie k3ICH > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill W2BLC" <[hidden email]> > To: <[hidden email]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:14 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question > > >> Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated (no tuning or knob twisting) 500 Watt HF station. Last time I saw that was a Halicrafters Tornado. >> >> I changed my entire radio desk to create more storage and shelves from the space formerly used by a large tube amp and the large tuner I used with it. The K3 and P3 take about the same space the previous HF rig took and the KPA500 and KAT500 take just slightly more space than the K3 by itself. In other words, the K-Line is extremely space efficient. >> >> Bill K-Line >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Same here re adding the KPA500/KAT500. I did have
an Ameriton AL-811H, and still do -- but have not fired it up since 2002. Worked fine, but not easy to use since it needed re-tuned with significant QSY. So mainly I did fine with my K2/100 and it was great until replaced by the "greater" K3! The Elecraft system is pretty much like having a 500 W. K3/P3. Once set up no need to touch the PA or ATU. Plus it the KAT500 handles switching among three antennas. I have four but #4 is a 30 m dipole and I mostly use that with lower power rigs (K2, K1 or KX3). The main shack re-work I needed was to replace RG-8X in-shack coax runs with RG-213. The AL-811H was only used with my beam and mostly on 20 SSB, and had dedicated cables to the antenna port. My desk and shelf set up worked fine with the amp and atu -- and my shack looks much neater (there was a Kenwood TS-570DG where the KPA500 is now). 73, Phil w7ox On 5/7/14, 4:50 PM, Joseph Carter wrote: > I just added the KPA500 and the KAT500 last month - first amp I've ever had but so cannot compare but love it! > Issue for me was ability to run on 120 volts. Great fun to assemble both and as mentioned nice compact grouping / size for my space constraints. > Joe, w9jc > > > On May 7, 2014, at 6:10 PM, Charlie T, K3ICH wrote: > >> Well, if you want a kilowatt station the Icom IC-7600 and PW-1 offer the same functionality with a built-in antenna matching circuit. >> >> Curiously, I am getting about 400 watts out of the PW-1 driving it directly with the KX3 at 12 watts out (no ALC). >> >> 73, Charlie k3ICH >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill W2BLC" <[hidden email]> >> To: <[hidden email]> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:14 PM >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question >> >> >>> Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated (no tuning or knob twisting) 500 Watt HF station. Last time I saw that was a Halicrafters Tornado. >>> >>> I changed my entire radio desk to create more storage and shelves from the space formerly used by a large tube amp and the large tuner I used with it. The K3 and P3 take about the same space the previous HF rig took and the KPA500 and KAT500 take just slightly more space than the K3 by itself. In other words, the K-Line is extremely space efficient. >>> >>> Bill K-Line ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Ok, fine. You guys convinced me.
I'm getting KPA500/KAT500 over at Dayton next week. Elecraft guys: here i come! __________________ Slava (Sal) B, W2RMS [hidden email] On May 7, 2014, at 10:14 PM, Phil Wheeler <[hidden email]> wrote: > Same here re adding the KPA500/KAT500. I did have an Ameriton AL-811H, and still do -- but have not fired it up since 2002. Worked fine, but not easy to use since it needed re-tuned with significant QSY. So mainly I did fine with my K2/100 and it was great until replaced by the "greater" K3! > > The Elecraft system is pretty much like having a 500 W. K3/P3. Once set up no need to touch the PA or ATU. Plus it the KAT500 handles switching among three antennas. I have four but #4 is a 30 m dipole and I mostly use that with lower power rigs (K2, K1 or KX3). > > The main shack re-work I needed was to replace RG-8X in-shack coax runs with RG-213. The AL-811H was only used with my beam and mostly on 20 SSB, and had dedicated cables to the antenna port. My desk and shelf set up worked fine with the amp and atu -- and my shack looks much neater (there was a Kenwood TS-570DG where the KPA500 is now). > > 73, Phil w7ox > > On 5/7/14, 4:50 PM, Joseph Carter wrote: >> I just added the KPA500 and the KAT500 last month - first amp I've ever had but so cannot compare but love it! >> Issue for me was ability to run on 120 volts. Great fun to assemble both and as mentioned nice compact grouping / size for my space constraints. >> Joe, w9jc >> >> >> On May 7, 2014, at 6:10 PM, Charlie T, K3ICH wrote: >> >>> Well, if you want a kilowatt station the Icom IC-7600 and PW-1 offer the same functionality with a built-in antenna matching circuit. >>> >>> Curiously, I am getting about 400 watts out of the PW-1 driving it directly with the KX3 at 12 watts out (no ALC). >>> >>> 73, Charlie k3ICH >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill W2BLC" <[hidden email]> >>> To: <[hidden email]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 4:14 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 question >>> >>> >>>> Exactly! The K-Line amounts to a fully automated (no tuning or knob twisting) 500 Watt HF station. Last time I saw that was a Halicrafters Tornado. >>>> >>>> I changed my entire radio desk to create more storage and shelves from the space formerly used by a large tube amp and the large tuner I used with it. The K3 and P3 take about the same space the previous HF rig took and the KPA500 and KAT500 take just slightly more space than the K3 by itself. In other words, the K-Line is extremely space efficient. >>>> >>>> Bill K-Line > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Hi everyone!
I just got this new Dell LCD monitor specifically for the P3/SVGA. Its a 19.1 inch, 16:9 monitor. However, its maximum resolution seems to be 1366x768 at 60Hz. So the only res i can use on the P3 is 1280x1024. Any way to include the monitor's res in the SVGA firmware, so it can display natively? Not that it's unusable, but would be nice to have... I tried higher res numbers in the SVGA but the monitor refused them. Its a Dell E1914H. I guess that's what i get for getting a $65 monitor... __________________ Slava (Sal) B, W2RMS [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
