First post to this list
The KX1 has a fixed BFO designed for 600Hz offset; this is where I expected signal audio to peak. I validated what I thought I was experiencing that signal audio peaks closer to 400 Hz than 600 Hz, lower than expected. I put an audio spectrogram on the audio out of my KX1 (Visualization Software PC version). Input to KX1 was the XG2 signal generator at 7.040 MHz. I set up so that I was showing a good S/N and then manually swept the end-to-end response of the entire RF-to-audio path by slowly tuning the receiver across the signal plotting response peaks. End-to-end response shape seems normal falling off 20 dB per octave far above the peak and rising faster far below the peak with a nice rounded peak that is obviously sharper at the lower filter settings. Results tabulated as follows picks off the peak and -6dB points of the end to-end-response for four different filter settings: Filter setting Peak Audio -6dB High -6dB Low Maximum 592 Hz 1214 Hz 159 Hz 1.0 500 Hz 697 Hz 259 Hz 0.5 442 Hz 554 Hz 321 Hz Min 444 Hz 516 Hz 337 Hz As you can see with narrower filter settings the maximum signal tune point is a beat-frequency tone just north of 440 Hz. The signal is already more than 6 dB down by the time I have tuned to the design 600 Hz offset point, where I would zero beat another signal. Have other KX1 owners noted signals peaking at a low CW tone? I find myself listening to some low notes on weak signals and this means I do a rather poor job of zero beating. I don't have an RF frequency measurement tool but am suspecting that the BFO could be set more optimally in my case. Does anyone know if there is a way that I might trim the BFO frequency 100-200 Hz lower? Or, possibly there is something else going on and I am looking in the wrong place? Mike Scott AE6WA Tarzana, CA DM04 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Hi, Mike.
I noticed exactly the same thing here. In fact the passband ripple of my KX1 is pretty bad, 600Hz is actually in a trough not a peak! And when I narrow the filter to the narrowest setting it centers on around 480Hz. Neither of these is a fairly significant issue in practice though. If I have occasion to use the filter in its narrowest position then I zero beat first then use the RIT to move the signal down to 500Hz before closing the filter to its narrowest position. Most of the time my filter stays in one of three positions: 5 oclock - fully open - Quiet band. 12 oclock - halfway open - Fair amount of QRM. 9 oclock - about 2/10 open - In the 9 oclock position the audio peaks (to the ear) at 600Hz so this is the most useful position for zero- beating. I almost never close it right down (7 oclock position) however I did last weekend when I had a station come on 100Hz away from my QSO and he couldn't hear me. In this situation I use the RIT control to send the wanted signal to 500Hz after zero-beating at 600Hz. Does that help? By the way Michael VE3WMB mentioned before that he has the same ripple pattern in the ten-tec scout and it may be a feature of the Jones filter design. After all the component count in the KX1 is tightly controlled and there are tradeoffs because of that. http://www.ac6rm.net/mailarchive/html/elecraft-list/2004-06/msg00906.html 73 Martin. ___________________________________________________________ Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now. http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |