KX3 and K3 Performance (and the Sherwood Table)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view

KX3 and K3 Performance (and the Sherwood Table)

wayne burdick
You may have noticed that Rob Sherwood, NC0B, has added the KX3 to his  
receiver performance table (http://www.sherweng.com/table.html). Rob's  
test procedure is very similar to our own, so we're not surprised to  
see these excellent results.

Both the K3 and KX3 are near the top of the chart. Like other  
receivers in this range, they can handle crowded band conditions. But  
the two rigs have completely different receiver architectures, with  
different strengths.

The KX3 uses an architecture similar to many PC-based "SDRs" (software  
defined radios), with direct conversion to base-band (AF) or to a very  
low I.F. This architecture takes fewer components than a multi-
conversion superhet, facilitating a low-current, ultra-portable  
implementation. That was our primary goal for the KX3. It also allows  
us to provide a direct sound-card output for use with SDR programs  
such as HDSDR that offer a panadapter (spectral display) and other  

(The K3 is also an SDR, in that the DSP and MCU code can be quickly  
and easily udpated to add new modulation/demodulation techniques, etc.  
However, adding a spectral display to the K3 requires other hardware,  
such as the P3 panadapter.)

In contrast, the K3 uses a classic superhet architecture: it down-
converts to a medium I.F. (in this case 8.2 MHz), where it is possible  
to use very narrow crystal filters. With an appropriate narrow filter  
selected, the K3 can provide extremely high dynamic range at close  
spacings. Its crystal filters and 15-kHz second I.F. provide nearly  
infinite opposite-sideband rejection, as well as very high blocking  
dynamic range.

If you're considering purchasing a K3 or KX3, but you're not sure  
which one would be best for you, I'd offer this advice: If you plan to  
do a lot of portable operation, or have limited space at home, the KX3  
is ideal. If you want the absolute best possible close-in dynamic  
range performance in contest or pile-up conditions (under 2 kHz  
spacing), go with the K3.

The K3 also has an internal 100-W amplifier option. The KX3's 100-W  
amp will be external--well suited to a mobile installation, for example.

Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html