LP Pan versus P3 Panadapters

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
21 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: LP Pan versus P3 Panadapters

Kok Chen

On Sep 15, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Alan Bloom wrote:

> If you turn on averaging in the waterfall you can see farther down into the noise.  It works best on steady carriers.  With CW signals you have to keep the averaging time less than a dit.


I have found that per-bin averaging of the power spectrum works rather well even with low duty cycle, keyed carriers.  Take a look at the two waterfalls in the "Weak Signal Button" section that is almost at the end of this page:

http://homepage.mac.com/chen/w7ay/cocoaModem/UsersManual/mfskManual/mfskManual/dominoex.html

The signal that you see there is DominoEX, where each carrier is present on average for only one out of 18 chip periods.  Moreover, with DominoEX, if a carrier is on for one chip, it is always off during the next chip, so there is never a "dah," as in CW, but only very short "dits."

73
Chen, W7AY

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
12