|
G'day,
Might be having to reconfigure the equipment layout. Anyone with experience of running an Acom 1000 or similar chunky linear with the transformer side only about 1 foot away from the left hand side of a K3. That is right hand side of Acom to left hand side of K3. The gap is currently approximately two feet with no apparent ill effect. Regards, Mike VP8NO ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Hi Mike,
My K3 and the ACOM 1000 are separated by the P3. The K3 is on the left. They were snuggled up right next to each other before I got the P3 a few weeks ago. Zero problems. 73, Mike NF4L On 9/6/12 5:05 PM, Mike Harris wrote: > G'day, > > Might be having to reconfigure the equipment layout. Anyone with > experience of running an Acom 1000 or similar chunky linear with the > transformer side only about 1 foot away from the left hand side of a K3. > That is right hand side of Acom to left hand side of K3. The gap is > currently approximately two feet with no apparent ill effect. > > Regards, > > Mike VP8NO > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike Harris
Mike,
That was a problem with the K2 (the AC magnetic field modulated the VFO magnetic components), but AFAIK, that is not a problem with the K3. Sometimes old problems get propagated where they should not be - we might even call those results "weeds". 73, Don W3FPR On 9/6/2012 5:05 PM, Mike Harris wrote: > G'day, > > Might be having to reconfigure the equipment layout. Anyone with > experience of running an Acom 1000 or similar chunky linear with the > transformer side only about 1 foot away from the left hand side of a K3. > That is right hand side of Acom to left hand side of K3. The gap is > currently approximately two feet with no apparent ill effect. > > Regards, > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike Reublin
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
|
In reply to this post by Mike Harris
Mike,
I have had each of my K3's tight up against the 2000A, 91B and 87A (transformer side)without any issues. But I must say at one point I had a cockpit error when I upgraded the firmware. For some reason the Line-In was at maximum. I was getting hum on my transmit audio if I was closer than a several inches from a transformer. Used a piece of steel as a shield that helped till I figured out what was going on. Reduced the Line-In and everything has been fine since. Duh! 73, N2TK, Tony -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Mike Harris Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 5:06 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] Location, location G'day, Might be having to reconfigure the equipment layout. Anyone with experience of running an Acom 1000 or similar chunky linear with the transformer side only about 1 foot away from the left hand side of a K3. That is right hand side of Acom to left hand side of K3. The gap is currently approximately two feet with no apparent ill effect. Regards, Mike VP8NO ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by KC6CNN
Good day,
Many thanks to all who replied. It seems I can plan with freedom of choice. I do have a K2 which probably fuelled my concern over the potential for hum problems. Regards, Mike VP8NO K2/100 1400 K3/100 0345 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by N2TK
On 9/6/2012 4:48 PM, N2TK, Tony wrote:
> For some reason the Line-In was > at maximum. I was getting hum on my transmit audio The problem is that the transformers are unshielded (and un-needed, but that's another discussion), and unshielded transformers are sitting ducks for magnetic fields. The simplest solution is to roll off the low end using TXEQ, which is a good move anyway. Most of the what comes through a mic picking up speech below about 150 Hz is breath pop, handling noise, and room noise, and nothing below about 400 Hz contributes to speech intelligibility. So a smart operator will use TXEQ to kill everything below about 300-400 Hz. TXEQ makes that easy, and it kills the hum picked up by the transformer. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Hi guys,
for the same reason I think that rolling off at least the first TXEQ band could be a good idea also for AFSK communication, but the TXEQ is flat in data mode, and not modifiable. Could this be an useful addition to a new firmware release? Ciao 73 Fabio IZ4AFW - NZ1W - HI9/IZ4AFW Il 07/09/2012 8.06, Jim Brown ha scritto: > On 9/6/2012 4:48 PM, N2TK, Tony wrote: >> For some reason the Line-In was >> at maximum. I was getting hum on my transmit audio > > The problem is that the transformers are unshielded (and un-needed, but > that's another discussion), and unshielded transformers are sitting > ducks for magnetic fields. The simplest solution is to roll off the low > end using TXEQ, which is a good move anyway. Most of the what comes > through a mic picking up speech below about 150 Hz is breath pop, > handling noise, and room noise, and nothing below about 400 Hz > contributes to speech intelligibility. So a smart operator will use > TXEQ to kill everything below about 300-400 Hz. TXEQ makes that easy, > and it kills the hum picked up by the transformer. > > 73, Jim K9YC > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
On 9/7/2012 1:54 AM, Fabio IZ4AFW / NZ1W wrote:
> for the same reason I think that rolling off at least the first TXEQ > band could be a good idea also for AFSK communication, but the TXEQ is > flat in data mode, and not modifiable. Actually, in AFSK and Data modes are programmed with low frequency rolloff. Elecraft added this feature several years ago. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
