W3FPR:
>Current tests do consider MDS to be the minimum signal that can be demodulated with no other considerations. Right or wrong, that is the way it is for now - something must be defined for lab measurements to be valid - we just trust that they are adequate to be useful in actual operating conditions. GM4ESD: >MDS as you appreciate means 'Minimum Discernible Signal' not a signal at the noise floor. IIRC the term was first intended to quantify the signal which could be discerned by a human or device connected to a receiver's output, which certainly in the human case introduces a variable. Some people can hear a signal well below the noise floor thanks to the filter between the ears, others with impaired hearing may not hear the signal until it rises well above the noise floor. ARRL uses the following definition of MDS in their test procedure (page 35 below): http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/testproc.pdf 5.1 NOISE FLOOR TEST 5.1.1 The purpose of the Noise Floor Test (also known as "Minimum Discernible Signal" or MDS) is to determine the level of signal input to the receiver that will produce an audio output where the power in the signal is equal to the power in the noise (S + N = N + 3 dB). The test is conducted with the receiver in the CW mode using the 500 Hz, or closest available, IF filters (or audio filters where IF filters are not available. For receivers that have appropriate IF filters, all audio filtering is disabled.) Set the AGC to the OFF position if possible. This test is meant to provide a repeatable, quantifiable means of measuring sensitivity, that takes subjective human elements out of the picture (i.e. my ear's MDS may be better or worse than your ear's MDS). The key issues above are to use a standard 500 Hz bandwidth (to remove noise bandwidth variations for other BW choices) and to use a True RMS voltmeter to determine the 3 dB point for (S+N)/N. Since noise is present in both S+N and N, the True RMS voltmeter is critical to the measurement. MDS is one of the least meaningful parameters to me since I spend most of my time on the low bands where the natural noise floor is far above the noise floor of any modern receiver. In fact I am more likely to be using attenuation rather than a preamp. If I were a VHF type, MDS might be more important due to the very low galactic noise floor at those frequencies. As Geoff said earlier, a well-trained human "ear/brain DSP" is capable of effective bandwidths of about 50 Hz. In the case of published MDS specs for a standard 500 Hz bandwidth, you can typically subtract another 10 dB from published figures (i.e. improvement for 50 Hz ear/brain DSP versus 500 Hz radio DSP yields 10 dB improvement). This puts the actual MDS level at (+3 -10 = -7) 7 dB below the 500 Hz noise floor, which is quite believable since some people are reportedly able to copy signals as much as 10 dB below the noise floor. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |