I find the MH2 a bit on the large side for my hands, so the MH4 looks interesting to me. The case appears to be identical to the Icom HM-36,which I use with one of my K2s and find very comfortable to hold.
Can anyone confirm that the dimensions match? Has anyone tried out the MH4 for audio quality yet? 73, Steve VE3SMA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Administrator
|
> On Sep 3, 2017, at 6:09 AM, Steve Kavanagh via Elecraft <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I find the MH2 a bit on the large side for my hands, so the MH4 looks interesting to me. The case appears to be identical to the Icom HM-36,which I use with one of my K2s and find very comfortable to hold. > > Can anyone confirm that the dimensions match? They do. It’s the same size as our MH3, used with the KX2 and KX3. > > Has anyone tried out the MH4 for audio quality yet? We’ve done a lot of in-house testing of the MH4, and it works great. This isn’t surprising given that it’s the same element we used in the MH3. 73, Wayne N6KR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
Thanks, Wayne. Very tempting!
73, Steve VE3SMA -------------------------------------------- On Sun, 9/3/17, Wayne Burdick <[hidden email]> wrote: > Can anyone confirm that the dimensions match? They do. It’s the same size as our MH3, used with the KX2 and KX3. > Has anyone tried out the MH4 for audio quality yet? We’ve done a lot of in-house testing of the MH4, and it works great. This isn’t surprising given that it’s the same element we used in the MH3. 73, Wayne N6KR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
I agree, thanks Wayne and Eric and Elecraft. In the year that I bought my first transmitter, the
MH4 would have cost (if we go backwards on inflation) about $7.25. That was back in 1960. So, not a bad deal at all, seems very cheap in fact. Of course, I didn’t need a mic for that transmitter back then, my Eico 720 was CW only. By the way, just ordered the MH4. > On Sep 3, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Steve Kavanagh via Elecraft <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Thanks, Wayne. Very tempting! > > 73, > Steve VE3SMA > -------------------------------------------- > On Sun, 9/3/17, Wayne Burdick <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Can anyone confirm that the dimensions match? > > They do. It’s the same size as our MH3, used with the KX2 and KX3. > >> Has anyone tried out the MH4 for audio quality yet? > > We’ve done a lot of in-house testing of the MH4, and it works great. This > isn’t surprising given that it’s the same element we used in the MH3. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by wayne burdick
Wayne, will you offer a mic adapter to also use with KX@ and KX3?
73, Bill K9YEQ -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Wayne Burdick Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 3:05 PM To: Steve Kavanagh <[hidden email]> Cc: Elecraft Reflector <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] MH4 Microphone Questions > On Sep 3, 2017, at 6:09 AM, Steve Kavanagh via Elecraft <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I find the MH2 a bit on the large side for my hands, so the MH4 looks interesting to me. The case appears to be identical to the Icom HM-36,which I use with one of my K2s and find very comfortable to hold. > > Can anyone confirm that the dimensions match? They do. It’s the same size as our MH3, used with the KX2 and KX3. > > Has anyone tried out the MH4 for audio quality yet? We’ve done a lot of in-house testing of the MH4, and it works great. This isn’t surprising given that it’s the same element we used in the MH3. 73, Wayne N6KR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Bill,
I would suggest that it would be much easier to create an adapter for the MH3 to an 8 pin Foster plug - an 8 pin Foster jack to a 3.5mm plug would be quite cumbersome and clumsy in comparison to the size and portability of the KX2/KX3. The PTT connection would be easy (PTT goes to ground), but if you also wanted the UP and DN buttons to work, you would have to add some level sensing circuitry whose outputs would be connected to the UP and down input pins on the Foster connector. Look at the schematic of the KX2/KX3 mic connections and compare the output to the pinout of the K3(S) mic connector and you will see the difficulty. So I think the adapter that you have suggested would not be practical for the KX2/KX3. 73, Don W3FPR On 9/3/2017 6:34 PM, Bill Johnson wrote: > Wayne, will you offer a mic adapter to also use with KX@ and KX3? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
Steve,
Since the microphone element is the same as that used in the MH2 and MH3 microphones, I would expect the same audio quality. Yes, the dimensions are the same as the Icom HM-36. I just compared them at the Shelby, NC hamfest. 73, Don W3FPR On 9/3/2017 9:09 AM, Steve Kavanagh via Elecraft wrote: > > Has anyone tried out the MH4 for audio quality yet? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |