Musings on Noise Reduction

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Musings on Noise Reduction

Lee Trout
John:  I agree:  The noise reduction on the K3 is poor.  To my ear, all 16 settings introduce distortion while providing minimal noise reduction.  And yes, I have played around with rx eq settings.  My little Kenwood 480 has much better N/R than the K3.

The N/R is my only major complaint about the K3.   I hope a firmware fix soon.

73 all,  Lee (K9CM)

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Musings on Noise Reduction

Roger Marrotte-2
Lee,
 
Sorry to say that I've had the exact opposite experience.  I haven't had a K2 for a few years.  I've had a K3 since July.   I worked some in the 160m contest this weekend and with NR on I was able to remove just about all the noise on the band and hear stations way way down in the noise.  I never had that experience with a K2 and I've used three different K2s.  What I experienced this weekend with my K3 was just phenomenal.  I worked about a dozen DX stations some as far out as the middle east.  Without NR I wouldn't have heard them at all.  I not sure why we have had such different experiences.  I didn't have a hard time finding a NR setting that worked.  On occasion I would hear some band noise but most of the time it virtually went away with the NR on.  I use a full size 160m dipole up about 70'.  It's the same antenna I used with the K2s.  Perhaps if you were using a vertical, the noise was more severe or just different.
 
Roger, W1EM


From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lee Trout
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 5:51 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] Musings on Noise Reduction

John:  I agree:  The noise reduction on the K3 is poor.  To my ear, all 16 settings introduce distortion while providing minimal noise reduction.  And yes, I have played around with rx eq settings.  My little Kenwood 480 has much better N/R than the K3.

The N/R is my only major complaint about the K3.   I hope a firmware fix soon.

73 all,  Lee (K9CM)

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Musings on Noise Reduction

Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO
It might be instructive to compare what AGC settings in the configuration menu Roger and Lee are using. Might this be involved in the drastically different subjective experiences reported?
 
Bill W5WVO
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 4:07 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Musings on Noise Reduction

Lee,
 
Sorry to say that I've had the exact opposite experience.  I haven't had a K2 for a few years.  I've had a K3 since July.   I worked some in the 160m contest this weekend and with NR on I was able to remove just about all the noise on the band and hear stations way way down in the noise.  I never had that experience with a K2 and I've used three different K2s.  What I experienced this weekend with my K3 was just phenomenal.  I worked about a dozen DX stations some as far out as the middle east.  Without NR I wouldn't have heard them at all.  I not sure why we have had such different experiences.  I didn't have a hard time finding a NR setting that worked.  On occasion I would hear some band noise but most of the time it virtually went away with the NR on.  I use a full size 160m dipole up about 70'.  It's the same antenna I used with the K2s.  Perhaps if you were using a vertical, the noise was more severe or just different.
 
Roger, W1EM


From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lee Trout
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 5:51 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] Musings on Noise Reduction

John:  I agree:  The noise reduction on the K3 is poor.  To my ear, all 16 settings introduce distortion while providing minimal noise reduction.  And yes, I have played around with rx eq settings.  My little Kenwood 480 has much better N/R than the K3.

The N/R is my only major complaint about the K3.   I hope a firmware fix soon.

73 all,  Lee (K9CM)


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Musings on Noise Reduction

rlindzen
It might also be interesting to see whether NR can be made to be useful for SSB.

Dick, KA1SA

At 09:05 PM 12/7/2008, Bill W5WVO wrote:
It might be instructive to compare what AGC settings in the configuration menu Roger and Lee are using. Might this be involved in the drastically different subjective experiences reported?
 
Bill W5WVO
----- Original Message -----
From: [hidden email]
To: [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 4:07 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Musings on Noise Reduction

Lee,
 
Sorry to say that I've had the exact opposite experience.  I haven't had a K2 for a few years.  I've had a K3 since July.   I worked some in the 160m contest this weekend and with NR on I was able to remove just about all the noise on the band and hear stations way way down in the noise.  I never had that experience with a K2 and I've used three different K2s.  What I experienced this weekend with my K3 was just phenomenal.  I worked about a dozen DX stations some as far out as the middle east.  Without NR I wouldn't have heard them at all.  I not sure why we have had such different experiences.  I didn't have a hard time finding a NR setting that worked.  On occasion I would hear some band noise but most of the time it virtually went away with the NR on.  I use a full size 160m dipole up about 70'.  It's the same antenna I used with the K2s.  Perhaps if you were using a vertical, the noise was more severe or just different.
 
Roger, W1EM


From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lee Trout
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 5:51 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] Musings on Noise Reduction

John:  I agree:  The noise reduction on the K3 is poor.  To my ear, all 16 settings introduce distortion while providing minimal noise reduction.  And yes, I have played around with rx eq settings.  My little Kenwood 480 has much better N/R than the K3.

The N/R is my only major complaint about the K3.   I hope a firmware fix soon.

73 all,  Lee (K9CM)


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft  

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft  

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Musings on Noise Reduction

WA6L

I started this thread and I have been watching the replies with interest.  Dick's question about AGC settings piqued my interest and I did some additional research.

First, Lyle Johnson's message here: http://n2.nabble.com/K3-AGC-Settings-Tutorial-td681120.html#a681120 does much to explain the AGC settings.

Then, Fred KT5X's message here:  http://n2.nabble.com/K3-AGC-settings-td395668.html#a395668 provided the inspiration to put the AGC configuration settings on the PF1 and PF2 buttons.

Armed with this information, I spent an hour or so experimenting with AGC and Noise Reduction.  I am pleased to say that I found a combination that has vastly improved my NR experience.  The noise reduction is now working pretty darn well with a setting of F3-2.  I won't go as far as to say its as good as the K2's (yet) but it's getting there.

I urge you to do your own experimentation, but here are the settings I landed on:

AGC THR = 7
AGC SLP = 12
AGC F = 100

Thanks, good luck, and please let me know if you come up with settings that work for you.

73,

John, WA6L


Richard S. Lindzen wrote

It might also be interesting to see whether NR can be made to be useful
for SSB.
Dick, KA1SA
At 09:05 PM 12/7/2008, Bill W5WVO wrote:
It
might be instructive to compare what AGC settings in the configuration
menu Roger and Lee are using. Might this be involved in the drastically
different subjective experiences reported?
 
Bill W5WVO
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Musings on Noise Reduction

Roger Marrotte-2
In reply to this post by Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO
I have the default settings for AGC.
 
Roger, W1EM 


From: Bill W5WVO [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 9:06 PM
To: Roger Marrotte; 'Lee Trout'
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Musings on Noise Reduction

It might be instructive to compare what AGC settings in the configuration menu Roger and Lee are using. Might this be involved in the drastically different subjective experiences reported?
 
Bill W5WVO
 

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Musings on Noise Reduction

Gary, W7TEA
In reply to this post by WA6L
Yes, adjusting the AGC Threshold made a significant difference in NR for me on CW.  I was using 3 or 4 and now use 5 or 6.  NR is not appropriate or helpful in all occasions but I use it more than before.

thanks!  Gary W7TEA

<quote author="WA6L">

I started this thread and I have been watching the replies with interest.  Dick's question about AGC settings piqued my interest and I did some additional research.

First, Lyle Johnson's message here: http://n2.nabble.com/K3-AGC-Settings-Tutorial-td681120.html#a681120 does much to explain the AGC settings.

Then, Fred KT5X's message here:  http://n2.nabble.com/K3-AGC-settings-td395668.html#a395668 provided the inspiration to put the AGC configuration settings on the PF1 and PF2 buttons.

Armed with this information, I spent an hour or so experimenting with AGC and Noise Reduction.  I am pleased to say that I found a combination that has vastly improved my NR experience.  The noise reduction is now working pretty darn well with a setting of F3-2.  I won't go as far as to say its as good as the K2's (yet) but it's getting there.

I urge you to do your own experimentation, but here are the settings I landed on:

AGC THR = 7
AGC SLP = 12
AGC F = 100

Thanks, good luck, and please let me know if you come up with settings that work for you.

73,

John, WA6L


73,

Gary W7TEA  K3 #1001, #5763