N6KR FD report

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

N6KR FD report

wayne burdick
Administrator
I had only a few hours to participate this year, so  I put the KX1 and
accessories into a day-pack and walked to a nearby park. Conditions
seemed to be good, and I made some 60 contacts on 20 and 40 CW (running
1.5 W, using internal batteries). I listened from home on Saturday
night and found 80 meters really busy -- nice to hear this band so
active. On Sunday I took the K2 as well as the KX1, and made some SSB
and 15 m CW Qs.

My big takeaway from the weekend is that a longer, partly-horizontal
random wire is more effective than 25' of wire straight up, at least
for 40 m daytime operation. With the vertical wire, I missed some
contacts. On Sunday I put up 50' of wire, of which over half was
horizontal, and had much better luck on 40.

73,
Wayne
N6KR

---

http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: N6KR FD report

Leigh L. Klotz Jr WA5ZNU
Administrator
Wayne,

What radial did you use on 40m for the 50ft random wire?  33ft, 33ft
shortened for ground coupling, or random length?

Background: I have tried using your recommendation of 28ft for the
center conductor and band-switching with 16, 24, or 33 ft on the ground
for the radial.  Bonnie KQ6XA recomends a radial 10-15% shorter than 1/4
lamda if it is not elevated, but I found 1.2:1 with the ATU, and don't
have the RF Ammeter (or light bulb) that K6ACJ Bill used to verify those
length recommendations.

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:18am, wayne burdick wrote:
> My big takeaway from the weekend is that a longer, partly-horizontal
> random wire is more effective than 25' of wire straight up, at least
> for 40 m daytime operation. With the vertical wire, I missed some
> contacts. On Sunday I put up 50' of wire, of which over half was
> horizontal, and had much better luck on 40.
73,
WA5ZNU Leigh
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: N6KR FD report

wayne burdick
Administrator

On Jun 28, 2004, at 11:55 AM, Leigh L. Klotz, Jr. wrote:

> Wayne,
>
> What radial did you use on 40m for the 50ft random wire?  33ft, 33ft
> shortened for ground coupling, or random length?
>
> Background: I have tried using your recommendation of 28ft for the
> center conductor and band-switching with 16, 24, or 33 ft on the
> ground for the radial.  Bonnie KQ6XA recomends a radial 10-15% shorter
> than 1/4 lamda if it is not elevated, but I found 1.2:1 with the ATU,
> and don't have the RF Ammeter (or light bulb) that K6ACJ Bill used to
> verify those length recommendations.

The optimal length of ground radials will vary with how many you use,
as well as local conditions, including nearby objects (Bar-B-Ques,
highly-conductive family members, volleyball net supports, etc.). I was
actually using a single 15' radial, alligator-clipped to a 3' or so
ground rod that some past user of the picnic table had kindly pounded
in   ;)

50' is also just an estimate. In any case, the KX1 and K2 auto-tuners
both tuned up the random wire on all bands.

73,
Wayne
N6KR

---

http://www.elecraft.com