NB continuous control

[Eduardo González]

IF NB of K3 is powerful, but i think if this had a continuous control
for level, it would be much more convenient. I have a old Icom IC-740
(great receiver) and NB continous level fight successfully against
many paroxysmal interferences. It is cabling by step in hardware level
in the K3? I think Elecraft prefer step control because so is reduced
complexity, but K3 is not radio to the masses, it is radio to advanced
ham radio.
Another suggest is have possibility RIT/XIT control may have other
roles, as live continuous control, for example, to move level of IF NB
and DSP NB.
Noise Blanker is really important to me because my neighborhood is
plagued of noise typically treated with NB.

Eduardo - yy4gmj
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Bill K9YEQ]

Eduardo,

The K3 in my opinion is one for the masses.  You can use as many or as few
features as you wish.  You can assign buttons to do only the specific things
you want.  Find someone nearby that has one then check it out.  I love the
receiver for eliminating so many issues I have had with other radios.  I
leave my TS20000 off most of the time and it has a good noise blanker.  But
not the simplicity on the front panel of the K3.  All I have to do is push
and hold the button and I have a variable very adjustable setup.  It does
seem to be involved, but that is why this web site has so much help to get
you past any "complexity".

Bill
K9YEQ

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eduardo González
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 12:32 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] NB continuous control

IF NB of K3 is powerful, but i think if this had a continuous control for
level, it would be much more convenient. I have a old Icom IC-740 (great
receiver) and NB continous level fight successfully against many paroxysmal
interferences. It is cabling by step in hardware level in the K3? I think
Elecraft prefer step control because so is reduced complexity, but K3 is not
radio to the masses, it is radio to advanced ham radio.
Another suggest is have possibility RIT/XIT control may have other roles, as
live continuous control, for example, to move level of IF NB and DSP NB.
Noise Blanker is really important to me because my neighborhood is plagued
of noise typically treated with NB.

Eduardo - yy4gmj
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html