I especially like the "Cleanup Macro" but have added the step to return the bandwidth to normal by adding SWH58; Now looks like: FT0;RT0;XT0;LN0;SB0;SWH58; Howard..K2HK HK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Is there a reason why Config PB CTRL SHIFT forces BW to 400 Hz? It is
annoying having to restore the BW setting from 400 Hz every time you change the PB shift step size, especially if you jump back and forth alot between the two step sizes. 73, Drew AF2Z ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Hi Aptos, When will be available new Low pass filter board for K3? regards, E72X - Gordan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by drewko
Drew,
I never imagined anyone would switch back and forth between .01 and . 05 kHz SHIFT steps when I added this feature. Our customers who had lobbied for .01 kHz tried this setting, then (presumably) kept it that way. The passband has to be normalized after changing this setting in order to clean up internal variables associated with SHIFT and WIDTH. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:04 AM, drewko wrote: > Is there a reason why Config PB CTRL SHIFT forces BW to 400 Hz? It is > annoying having to restore the BW setting from 400 Hz every time you > change the PB shift step size, especially if you jump back and forth > alot between the two step sizes. > > 73, > Drew > AF2Z > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
The bandwidth appears to be limited when using 10 hz so particularly in psk
or rtty, I also switch fairly often and just dont use 10 hz unless I NEED it. What would be nice, if possible, is to auto change to 10 hz shift when you adjust your width below 200 or so and back when you go above that width. Thanks es 73, de Jim KG0KP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wayne Burdick" <[hidden email]> To: "drewko" <[hidden email]> Cc: <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 10:42 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 PB Ctrl Shift .01/.05 > Drew, > > I never imagined anyone would switch back and forth between .01 and . > 05 kHz SHIFT steps when I added this feature. Our customers who had > lobbied for .01 kHz tried this setting, then (presumably) kept it that > way. > > The passband has to be normalized after changing this setting in order > to clean up internal variables associated with SHIFT and WIDTH. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:04 AM, drewko wrote: > >> Is there a reason why Config PB CTRL SHIFT forces BW to 400 Hz? It is >> annoying having to restore the BW setting from 400 Hz every time you >> change the PB shift step size, especially if you jump back and forth >> alot between the two step sizes. >> >> 73, >> Drew >> AF2Z >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by wayne burdick
Wayne,
I guess I like using both of the SHIFT steps for CW: .01 for narrow filters and .05 for wide of course. Seems like a natural to me, as well as assigning SHIFT to a function switch for quick access. I'm surprised many CW ops would not do this. Only, the reset to 400 Hz BW every time... 73, Drew AF2Z On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:42:28 -0700, you wrote: >Drew, > >I never imagined anyone would switch back and forth between .01 and . >05 kHz SHIFT steps when I added this feature. Our customers who had >lobbied for .01 kHz tried this setting, then (presumably) kept it that >way. > >The passband has to be normalized after changing this setting in order >to clean up internal variables associated with SHIFT and WIDTH. > >73, >Wayne >N6KR > >On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:04 AM, drewko wrote: > >> Is there a reason why Config PB CTRL SHIFT forces BW to 400 Hz? It is >> annoying having to restore the BW setting from 400 Hz every time you >> change the PB shift step size, especially if you jump back and forth >> alot between the two step sizes. >> >> 73, >> Drew >> AF2Z >> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Waited for the .01 shift for CW. When it came out I changed to the .01
shift and have *never* changed it back. .05 feels, sounds klunky on CW and does not allow me to play games with the skirts when a strong station is up or down and bothering me. I use the "400" and "250" 8 pole roofing filters set to come in at 450 and 350 respectively (mine measure 410 and 330 which suits me fine). My filter above 450 is 1800. What do you mean by "wide" CW? 73, Guy. On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:46 PM, drewko <[hidden email]> wrote: > Wayne, > > I guess I like using both of the SHIFT steps for CW: .01 for narrow > filters and .05 for wide of course. Seems like a natural to me, as > well as assigning SHIFT to a function switch for quick access. I'm > surprised many CW ops would not do this. Only, the reset to 400 Hz BW > every time... > > 73, > Drew > AF2Z > > > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:42:28 -0700, you wrote: > > >Drew, > > > >I never imagined anyone would switch back and forth between .01 and . > >05 kHz SHIFT steps when I added this feature. Our customers who had > >lobbied for .01 kHz tried this setting, then (presumably) kept it that > >way. > > > >The passband has to be normalized after changing this setting in order > >to clean up internal variables associated with SHIFT and WIDTH. > > > >73, > >Wayne > >N6KR > > > >On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:04 AM, drewko wrote: > > > >> Is there a reason why Config PB CTRL SHIFT forces BW to 400 Hz? It is > >> annoying having to restore the BW setting from 400 Hz every time you > >> change the PB shift step size, especially if you jump back and forth > >> alot between the two step sizes. > >> > >> 73, > >> Drew > >> AF2Z > >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I guess that's my problem... Wide CW to me is greater than 1 KHz BW,
which I often use. A weak signal in these wide passbands can be improved alot by shifting the passband. But a 0.01 step, assuming it even covered the entire range, would be pretty tedious for such wide BW. So, yeah... I use both .01 and .05. It's just a little inconvenient when changing from one to the other and the WIDTH gets reset to 400 Hz every time. 73, Drew AF2Z On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:57:42 -0400, you wrote: >Waited for the .01 shift for CW. When it came out I changed to the .01 >shift and have *never* changed it back. > >.05 feels, sounds klunky on CW and does not allow me to play games with the >skirts when a strong station is up or down and bothering me. I use the >"400" and "250" 8 pole roofing filters set to come in at 450 and 350 >respectively (mine measure 410 and 330 which suits me fine). My filter >above 450 is 1800. What do you mean by "wide" CW? > >73, Guy. > >On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:46 PM, drewko <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Wayne, >> >> I guess I like using both of the SHIFT steps for CW: .01 for narrow >> filters and .05 for wide of course. Seems like a natural to me, as >> well as assigning SHIFT to a function switch for quick access. I'm >> surprised many CW ops would not do this. Only, the reset to 400 Hz BW >> every time... >> >> 73, >> Drew >> AF2Z >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:42:28 -0700, you wrote: >> >> >Drew, >> > >> >I never imagined anyone would switch back and forth between .01 and . >> >05 kHz SHIFT steps when I added this feature. Our customers who had >> >lobbied for .01 kHz tried this setting, then (presumably) kept it that >> >way. >> > >> >The passband has to be normalized after changing this setting in order >> >to clean up internal variables associated with SHIFT and WIDTH. >> > >> >73, >> >Wayne >> >N6KR >> > >> >On Oct 26, 2009, at 8:04 AM, drewko wrote: >> > >> >> Is there a reason why Config PB CTRL SHIFT forces BW to 400 Hz? It is >> >> annoying having to restore the BW setting from 400 Hz every time you >> >> change the PB shift step size, especially if you jump back and forth >> >> alot between the two step sizes. >> >> >> >> 73, >> >> Drew >> >> AF2Z >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |