Nearfield monitors

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Nearfield monitors

K7TV
Don Wilhelm wrote:

 

"Any radio will show its true audio traits if it is fed into a good
wide-range speaker (or amplifiers and speakers)."

 

I strongly agree, but theoretically a speaker with an intentionally limited
response (as opposed to a cheap speaker) can to some extent cover up some
problems in the radio's audio as revealed by the good wide-range speaker.

 

What I haven't seen mentioned in this discussion is that if you want a good
wide-range speaker, e.g. for critical examination of your radio, or for
permanent use if the radio has good audio, it is not enough to buy some
specific speaker known for good quality. Any given speaker can vary
enormously in its response curve depending on how it is placed in relation
to walls and other equipment. It is not enough to follow some instruction
sheet that came with the speaker. I find that with quality speakers it is
necessary to perform some kind of response measurement during installation.
This is not as straightforward as it may seem. Even good speakers tend to
have response variations with frequency, but if you look at measured
response diagrams, they are for anechoic chambers. In practical
installations you will encounter all kinds of room resonances that cause
bumpiness even with the best speakers. The objective then cannot be flat
response, but a flat average response over limited frequency ranges, and
balance between those ranges. My favorite way of testing for that is to use
a series of warbling test tones, each of which covers a limited range of
different frequencies, as produced by an old test CD I have (disques PIERRE
VERANY PV 784031 CA 803 "DEMONSTRATIONS TESTS"). On the detection side I use
a cheap RS sound level meter. It is not perfect for the highest audible
range, but the room resonances happen mostly at the lower frequencies
anyway. You get an average reading during the warbling, and this is much
faster than measuring at high numbers of individual frequencies. Warning:
when you have moved the speakers for the flattest possible response, they
are not likely to be where you would like them from a decorator's point of
view!

 

73,

Erik K7TV

 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Nearfield monitors

Don Wilhelm-4
  True, true.

My Vandersteen speakers that I use for my home theater listening must be
placed more than 2 feet from the wall, and are mounted on 3 point floor
stands.  I did not ask a decorator, I asked my audio experts - the
decoration is secondary to the acoustical performance.  One must make
compromises, but I choose to not compromise the audio response.  
Fortunately, the XYL is forgiving on this subject (after she heard it).  
I did have to make compromises in the placement of the surround sound
rear speakers - but that is not applicable to this discussion, so regard
it as a mere fact in passing.

The point relevant to ham radio is that a high fidelity audio
installation is not out of the question for the best appreciation of
what any particular receiver can produce.  Speakers with a bumpy
response will color the audio heard, and may produce unpleasant
products.  A radio should not be judged by the speakers that you attach
to it, the speakers should faithfully produce the audio fed to them.  
One may choose to make compromises here, but I choose not to do that.  
IMHO, the sound from those old speakers sold with several ham radio
receivers sound distorted.  But, if you like it, each to his own opinion.

What I am suggesting is that you try connecting the K3 audio output to a
good high quality sound system to gain an appreciation for how good it
can sound - then make your own compromises from that point of
reference.  Yes, the XYL is quite happy listening to a radio station on
one of those "under the cabinet" radios, but I just have to walk away
from that distorted audio - each to his own.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 10/27/2010 11:09 PM, Erik Basilier wrote:
>   Warning:
> when you have moved the speakers for the flattest possible response, they
> are not likely to be where you would like them from a decorator's point of
> view!
>
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html