OT: An interesting view of IPC-610

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OT: An interesting view of IPC-610

m5kvk
I noted a reference to IPC-610 in a recent thread on soldering. I thought
readers might be interested in an 2011 article that takes a caustic view of
IPC-610.

TLDR: The work-inspect-rework mantra of IPC-610 is a recipe for reducing
the reliability of assemblies: mainly due to heat stress caused by manual
soldering being a higher-temperature operation that flow-soldering.

You can read the article at
https://www.assemblymag.com/blogs/14-assembly-blog/post/89217-the-curse-of-ipc-a-610-and-ipc-j-std-001

--
Gareth M5KVK
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OT: An interesting view of IPC-610

Mark Goldberg
I am aware of that article and did reference the fact that some do not like
these requirements. The author does not suggest an alternative.

In the practice I have seen in the aerospace industry, there was not the
large amount of rework described. The emphasis was on using correct
processes to result in good solder joints the first time.

Lots of other specs we're used and massive process development occurs in
the manufacturing industry.

The drive to take manufacturing overseas is due to lots of factors besides
these specs.

In my case, I use a reflow oven with controlled processes to produce good
solder joints and only rework if it does not functioning, which is very
rare. Reworking lead free SMT solder joints by hand would never produce
ones as good as the reflow oven. Working with lead free solder by hand
basically sucks, but that is another discussion.

73,

Mark
W7MLG

On Mar 28, 2018 1:27 AM, "Gareth M5KVK" <[hidden email]> wrote:

I noted a reference to IPC-610 in a recent thread on soldering. I thought
readers might be interested in an 2011 article that takes a caustic view of
IPC-610.

TLDR: The work-inspect-rework mantra of IPC-610 is a recipe for reducing
the reliability of assemblies: mainly due to heat stress caused by manual
soldering being a higher-temperature operation that flow-soldering.

You can read the article at
https://www.assemblymag.com/blogs/14-assembly-blog/post/89217-the-curse-of-ipc-a-610-and-ipc-j-std-001

--
Gareth M5KVK
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]