OT: CTCSS tones for repeaters

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OT: CTCSS tones for repeaters

Ken G Kopp
GM guys!  Thanks for the "reality check" on the current situation as it
relates to the use of -output- CTCSS tones on amateur repeaters.  I can
certainly understand the advantages,
especially in intermod crud impacted areas.

73
Ken - K0PP
Montana Frequency Coordinator
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OT: CTCSS tones for repeaters

Bill Frantz
One additional note. When repeaters send CTCSS tones, many
radios depend on the poor low frequency performance of small
speakers to suppress the audio tone. This approach fails when
using a car audio system to get enough volume to overcome wind
noise etc. Having a fairly steep rolloff below 300 Hz available
would help with this situation.

73 Bill AE6JV

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | "The only thing we have to   | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | fear is fear itself." - FDR  | 16345
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | Inaugural address, 3/4/1933  | Los Gatos,
CA 95032

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OT: CTCSS tones for repeaters

Jim Brown-10
On Thu,3/12/2015 10:13 AM, Bill Frantz wrote:
> Having a fairly steep rolloff below 300 Hz available would help with
> this situation.

This should be easy with RXEQ. It's also good practice to roll off the
lows on FM TX for the same reason it's good on the HF bands. While the
lows don't burn more power with FM, they do use up deviation that would
better served by voice range, so the practical effect is the same.

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]