(OT) Threat to 30 meters

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

(OT) Threat to 30 meters

Thom LaCosta
If you use 30 meters for CW there may be an unpleasent surprize on the horizon.

I've posted information about it at www.zerobeat.net

If you operate CW at low poer levels, you really should read the material.



73,Thom-k3hrn
www.zerobeat.net Home of QRP Web Ring, Drakelist home page,
Free Classified Ads for amateur radio, QRP IRC channel
Elecraft Owners Database
www.tlchost.net/              Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (OT) Threat to 30 meters

DYARNES
 
In a message dated 4/4/2005 8:19:17 PM US Mountain Standard Time,  
[hidden email] writes:

If you  use 30 meters for CW there may be an unpleasent surprize on the  
horizon.

I've posted information about it at www.zerobeat.net

If  you operate CW at low poer levels, you really should read the  material.






Could you be a little more specific please?  
 
Dave W7AQK
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: (OT) Threat to 30 meters

Don Wilhelm-3
In reply to this post by Thom LaCosta
Thom,

OK, I may be dense, but I opened the page you referenced and nothing hit me
in the face about 'unpleasant surprize' and '30 meters'.  Can you be more
specific - I just don't have the time to look through all the links on that
page to find what you seem to be inferring.

73,
Don W3FPR

> -----Original Message-----
>
> If you use 30 meters for CW there may be an unpleasent surprize
> on the horizon.
>
> I've posted information about it at www.zerobeat.net
>
> If you operate CW at low poer levels, you really should read the material.
>
>
>
> 73,Thom-k3hrn
> www.zerobeat.net Home of QRP Web Ring, Drakelist home page,
> Free Classified Ads for amateur radio, QRP IRC channel
> Elecraft Owners Database
> www.tlchost.net/              Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
>


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: (OT) Threat to 30 meters

John [N5BSD]
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think he is refering to the Winlink stuff


73
- -----------------------------------
John
N5BSD
www.N5BSD.Com
Linux user #286770
Machine # 246511
http://counter.li.org
- ------------------------------------
- -----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of W3FPR - Don
Wilhelm
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:53 PM
To: Thom R. Lacosta; [hidden email]
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] (OT) Threat to 30 meters

Thom,

OK, I may be dense, but I opened the page you referenced and nothing
hit me in the face about 'unpleasant surprize' and '30 meters'.  Can
you be more specific - I just don't have the time to look through all
the links on that page to find what you seem to be inferring.

73,
Don W3FPR

> -----Original Message-----
>
> If you use 30 meters for CW there may be an unpleasent surprize on
> the  horizon.
>
> I've posted information about it at www.zerobeat.net
>
> If you operate CW at low poer levels, you really should read the
> material.
>
>
>
> 73,Thom-k3hrn
> www.zerobeat.net Home of QRP Web Ring, Drakelist home page, Free
> Classified Ads for amateur radio, QRP IRC channel Elecraft Owners
> Database
> www.tlchost.net/              Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQlINlj4STIkCKSUlEQJF5wCghIsiNl8Ssnelx4bHDWz1ycgVe34AnRRc
GS3Zrrpy8khF/ObndEdO/56e
=J2uW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: (OT) Threat to 30 meters

Bob Nielsen
In reply to this post by Thom LaCosta
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:18:27PM -0400, Thom R. Lacosta wrote:
> If you use 30 meters for CW there may be an unpleasent surprize on the
> horizon.
>
> I've posted information about it at www.zerobeat.net
>
> If you operate CW at low poer levels, you really should read the material.
>

As part of the ARRL's continuing look at possible recommendations for
changes to the FCC rules governing amateur radio, there is a proposal to
have small segments of the various HF bands where wider-band (3 kHz)
bandwidth data modes could be used (WinLink is only one of the data
modes which could make use of this).
 
While nothing has been formally proposed yet and the details being
discussed have changed a bit over the past year or so, the current
thinking of the ARRL board is that the 3 kHz bandwidth would be
permitted not over the whole 30 meter band but only between
10.135-10.150 kHz (see http://www.arrl.org/announce/ec_minutes_475.html)
where I doubt there is much, if any, CW activity (data modes are
currently permitted on the whole band, but tend to exist at the upper
end--the proposed changes would LIMIT wider bandwidth to this region).

Unfortunately there is much innacurate information being circulated
about these proposals.  I see it as a positive thing, not a threat and
certainly not the end of the world.  

Most countries have much less regulation of modes and bandwidth than
does the U.S. and IMHO a loosening of our rules should be viewed as a
positive thing.

73,
Bob, N7XY
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com