OT: the value of "accurate measures" for ham radio

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OT: the value of "accurate measures" for ham radio

DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL
Dear Elecraft reflectorees....

I have received some good (private) replies to my query about the need
for accuracy and I've learned a lot about how other think.

Shown below is one reply that I feel is worth sharing.  I'm not an
engineer, so I found this to be especially enlightening.  I assume
some (many?) will cry sacrilege, but since this is not me speaking,
don't yell at me.  I'm only the piano player!
       

[snip]
I do have to chuckle when I read about these accurate measurements on a Bird
wattmeter. Back in the 80's when I was involved with RF generators, we used
Bird slugs in the power monitoring section. We used a calorimeter to
calibrate the slugs. It was not uncommon to have the slugs off by as much as
60%! We had a box of over 200 slugs that were too far off to try to
calibrate. We threw them out. Should have saved then and sold them at Ham
fests. Would have been a good laugh when  someone said they checked their
power with a Bird meter.

Had one customer who called and bitched that his new 13.56MHZ 15KW generator
was putting out only 12KW at max power. He had tried two new Birds and they
read the same thing. Since we designed the 15KW generators to run continuous
at 18KW, we took our 13.56MHZ 20KW calibrated Bird to the customer. We
showed him that at the 15KW setting it was putting out 15KW and that when at
maximum as he was checking it, it was putting out 18KW. He was embarrassed
with his new Birds.
[end snip]

Comments?

de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OT: the value of "accurate measures" for ham radio

VR2BrettGraham
KR2Q asked:

>I have received some good (private) replies to my query about the need
>for accuracy and I've learned a lot about how other think.
>
>Shown below is one reply that I feel is worth sharing.  I'm not an
>engineer, so I found this to be especially enlightening.  I assume
>some (many?) will cry sacrilege, but since this is not me speaking,
>don't yell at me.  I'm only the piano player!

<snip story about Bird 43 accuracy>

>Comments?

The Bird 43 is a product that was designed some
50-odd years ago, with rated accuracy of +/- 5% at full
scale.

The slugs themselves add to that, how much I can't find -
maybe another +/- 5%?

A characterized Bird 43 (or any other piece of T&M
kit) used with appropriate care & understanding, has the
potential of providing results similar to what it was
characterized against.

73, VR2/KBrett7Graham/p.

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com