PLL Reference Oscillator Question

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

PLL Reference Oscillator Question

bviets
Hello everyone.  I purchased my K2 kit about 4 years ago and as life would
have it, I rarely have time to work on the beast except during holidays etc.
 More time for amateur radio would sure be nice, but I'm not near retirement
and for some reason I keep getting pesky bills in the mail.  Anyway here is
my situation:

1) I am at the Alignment and Test, Part II portion and trying to get through
the 4 MHz Oscillator Calibration section.
2) When I take a freq. measurement at TP3 for the PLL with the frequency
probe, I get a reading of ~12650, obviously way too high.
3) I inspected parts, soldering etc and cannot find a fault.
4) Decided to do some signal tracing and performed a measurement of the
reference oscillator signal on pin 1 of U4.  My reading is .51, instead of
the expected 0.8-1.8. Vrms.

So my question is this:

It seems that the 12650 measurement is so high that it may be an indicator
that the X1 crystal in the PLL oscillator is defective. However, with the
low reading on pin 1 of U4 I'm not so sure about the crystal.  Could the
increased frequency reading at TP3, cause the voltage drain on the U4 or am
I barking up the wrong tree?

I've looked through the email archives and haven't found anything quite
similar to my issue.  I hate to start pulling stuff apart if the crystal is
the issue and would like to hear what others think of the problem.

Thanks, 73 and Happy Holidays!

Byron Viets
N6UI
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL Reference Oscillator Question

Don Wilhelm-4
Byron,

Don't be too concerned about the 4 MHz oscillator calibration at this
point in your assembly process.  Once you have completed your K2, you
can refine the calibration - see the K2 Dial Calibration article on my
website www.w3fpr.com for "the rest of the story".

Yes, 12650 is higher than the high end of the range should be, but
please tell me what the low range is - while in CAL FCTR, tap BAND+ and
tell me what the frequency is, then tap BAND- and again tell me what the
displayed frequency is.  Perhaps I can craft an answer to the possible
trouble spots from that information.

73,
Don W3FPR

Byron Viets wrote:

> Hello everyone.  I purchased my K2 kit about 4 years ago and as life would
> have it, I rarely have time to work on the beast except during holidays etc.
>  More time for amateur radio would sure be nice, but I'm not near retirement
> and for some reason I keep getting pesky bills in the mail.  Anyway here is
> my situation:
>
> 1) I am at the Alignment and Test, Part II portion and trying to get through
> the 4 MHz Oscillator Calibration section.
> 2) When I take a freq. measurement at TP3 for the PLL with the frequency
> probe, I get a reading of ~12650, obviously way too high.
> 3) I inspected parts, soldering etc and cannot find a fault.
> 4) Decided to do some signal tracing and performed a measurement of the
> reference oscillator signal on pin 1 of U4.  My reading is .51, instead of
> the expected 0.8-1.8. Vrms.
>
> So my question is this:
>
> It seems that the 12650 measurement is so high that it may be an indicator
> that the X1 crystal in the PLL oscillator is defective. However, with the
> low reading on pin 1 of U4 I'm not so sure about the crystal.  Could the
> increased frequency reading at TP3, cause the voltage drain on the U4 or am
> I barking up the wrong tree?
>
> I've looked through the email archives and haven't found anything quite
> similar to my issue.  I hate to start pulling stuff apart if the crystal is
> the issue and would like to hear what others think of the problem.
>  
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL Reference Oscillator Question

bviets
Hi Don,
Thank you for your response.  When I try the freq. range test, there is no freq. change.  I searched the reflector and found an earlier email response authored by yourself with the subject of: K2 PLL range test SN 05233.  That person had a similar issue, so it would seem I can start tracking down the problem based on your diagnosis in that email.
73,
Byron
N6UI


Don Wilhelm-4 wrote
Byron,

Don't be too concerned about the 4 MHz oscillator calibration at this
point in your assembly process.  Once you have completed your K2, you
can refine the calibration - see the K2 Dial Calibration article on my
website www.w3fpr.com for "the rest of the story".

Yes, 12650 is higher than the high end of the range should be, but
please tell me what the low range is - while in CAL FCTR, tap BAND+ and
tell me what the frequency is, then tap BAND- and again tell me what the
displayed frequency is.  Perhaps I can craft an answer to the possible
trouble spots from that information.

73,
Don W3FPR

Byron Viets wrote:
> Hello everyone.  I purchased my K2 kit about 4 years ago and as life would
> have it, I rarely have time to work on the beast except during holidays etc.
>  More time for amateur radio would sure be nice, but I'm not near retirement
> and for some reason I keep getting pesky bills in the mail.  Anyway here is
> my situation:
>
> 1) I am at the Alignment and Test, Part II portion and trying to get through
> the 4 MHz Oscillator Calibration section.
> 2) When I take a freq. measurement at TP3 for the PLL with the frequency
> probe, I get a reading of ~12650, obviously way too high.
> 3) I inspected parts, soldering etc and cannot find a fault.
> 4) Decided to do some signal tracing and performed a measurement of the
> reference oscillator signal on pin 1 of U4.  My reading is .51, instead of
> the expected 0.8-1.8. Vrms.
>
> So my question is this:
>
> It seems that the 12650 measurement is so high that it may be an indicator
> that the X1 crystal in the PLL oscillator is defective. However, with the
> low reading on pin 1 of U4 I'm not so sure about the crystal.  Could the
> increased frequency reading at TP3, cause the voltage drain on the U4 or am
> I barking up the wrong tree?
>
> I've looked through the email archives and haven't found anything quite
> similar to my issue.  I hate to start pulling stuff apart if the crystal is
> the issue and would like to hear what others think of the problem.
>  
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL Reference Oscillator Question

Don Wilhelm-4
Byron,

Yes, that prior response may be helpful, but all may not apply to your
case - each one is different.
To be specific for your problem, first monitor the voltage from RF Board
U5 pin 7 while in CAL FCTR mode.  When tapping BAND+, the voltage should
go to about 4 volts and tapping BAND- should drop the voltage to near
zero volts.
If that is OK, then move on to U6 pin 1 - tapping BAND+ should produce
about 8 volts and BAND- should produce nearly zero volts.

Check those conditions first.  If those are all OK, then you can move on
to the varactor tests, but if there is a problem with the voltages
above, get back with me for additional tests and actions.

73,
Don W3FPR

bviets wrote:

> Hi Don,
> Thank you for your response.  When I try the freq. range test, there is no
> freq. change.  I searched the reflector and found an earlier email response
> authored by yourself with the subject of: K2 PLL range test SN 05233.  That
> person had a similar issue, so it would seem I can start tracking down the
> problem based on your diagnosis in that email.
> 73,
> Byron
> N6UI
>
>
>
> Don Wilhelm-4 wrote:
>  
>> Byron,
>>
>> Don't be too concerned about the 4 MHz oscillator calibration at this
>> point in your assembly process.  Once you have completed your K2, you
>> can refine the calibration - see the K2 Dial Calibration article on my
>> website www.w3fpr.com for "the rest of the story".
>>
>> Yes, 12650 is higher than the high end of the range should be, but
>> please tell me what the low range is - while in CAL FCTR, tap BAND+ and
>> tell me what the frequency is, then tap BAND- and again tell me what the
>> displayed frequency is.  Perhaps I can craft an answer to the possible
>> trouble spots from that information.
>>
>> 73,
>> Don W3FPR
>>
>> Byron Viets wrote:
>>    
>>> Hello everyone.  I purchased my K2 kit about 4 years ago and as life
>>> would
>>> have it, I rarely have time to work on the beast except during holidays
>>> etc.
>>>  More time for amateur radio would sure be nice, but I'm not near
>>> retirement
>>> and for some reason I keep getting pesky bills in the mail.  Anyway here
>>> is
>>> my situation:
>>>
>>> 1) I am at the Alignment and Test, Part II portion and trying to get
>>> through
>>> the 4 MHz Oscillator Calibration section.
>>> 2) When I take a freq. measurement at TP3 for the PLL with the frequency
>>> probe, I get a reading of ~12650, obviously way too high.
>>> 3) I inspected parts, soldering etc and cannot find a fault.
>>> 4) Decided to do some signal tracing and performed a measurement of the
>>> reference oscillator signal on pin 1 of U4.  My reading is .51, instead
>>> of
>>> the expected 0.8-1.8. Vrms.
>>>
>>> So my question is this:
>>>
>>> It seems that the 12650 measurement is so high that it may be an
>>> indicator
>>> that the X1 crystal in the PLL oscillator is defective. However, with the
>>> low reading on pin 1 of U4 I'm not so sure about the crystal.  Could the
>>> increased frequency reading at TP3, cause the voltage drain on the U4 or
>>> am
>>> I barking up the wrong tree?
>>>
>>> I've looked through the email archives and haven't found anything quite
>>> similar to my issue.  I hate to start pulling stuff apart if the crystal
>>> is
>>> the issue and would like to hear what others think of the problem.
>>>  
>>>
>>>      
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>>    
>
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.722 / Virus Database: 270.14.120/2587 - Release Date: 12/26/09 03:27:00
>
>  
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL Reference Oscillator Question

bviets
Don,
I did the voltage tests and they both checked out.  U6 was at 7.4, so a little under 8, but I would imagine that is within tolerance.  
73,
Byron
N6UI

Don Wilhelm-4 wrote
Byron,

Yes, that prior response may be helpful, but all may not apply to your
case - each one is different.
To be specific for your problem, first monitor the voltage from RF Board
U5 pin 7 while in CAL FCTR mode.  When tapping BAND+, the voltage should
go to about 4 volts and tapping BAND- should drop the voltage to near
zero volts.
If that is OK, then move on to U6 pin 1 - tapping BAND+ should produce
about 8 volts and BAND- should produce nearly zero volts.

Check those conditions first.  If those are all OK, then you can move on
to the varactor tests, but if there is a problem with the voltages
above, get back with me for additional tests and actions.

73,
Don W3FPR

bviets wrote:
> Hi Don,
> Thank you for your response.  When I try the freq. range test, there is no
> freq. change.  I searched the reflector and found an earlier email response
> authored by yourself with the subject of: K2 PLL range test SN 05233.  That
> person had a similar issue, so it would seem I can start tracking down the
> problem based on your diagnosis in that email.
> 73,
> Byron
> N6UI
>
>
>
> Don Wilhelm-4 wrote:
>  
>> Byron,
>>
>> Don't be too concerned about the 4 MHz oscillator calibration at this
>> point in your assembly process.  Once you have completed your K2, you
>> can refine the calibration - see the K2 Dial Calibration article on my
>> website www.w3fpr.com for "the rest of the story".
>>
>> Yes, 12650 is higher than the high end of the range should be, but
>> please tell me what the low range is - while in CAL FCTR, tap BAND+ and
>> tell me what the frequency is, then tap BAND- and again tell me what the
>> displayed frequency is.  Perhaps I can craft an answer to the possible
>> trouble spots from that information.
>>
>> 73,
>> Don W3FPR
>>
>> Byron Viets wrote:
>>    
>>> Hello everyone.  I purchased my K2 kit about 4 years ago and as life
>>> would
>>> have it, I rarely have time to work on the beast except during holidays
>>> etc.
>>>  More time for amateur radio would sure be nice, but I'm not near
>>> retirement
>>> and for some reason I keep getting pesky bills in the mail.  Anyway here
>>> is
>>> my situation:
>>>
>>> 1) I am at the Alignment and Test, Part II portion and trying to get
>>> through
>>> the 4 MHz Oscillator Calibration section.
>>> 2) When I take a freq. measurement at TP3 for the PLL with the frequency
>>> probe, I get a reading of ~12650, obviously way too high.
>>> 3) I inspected parts, soldering etc and cannot find a fault.
>>> 4) Decided to do some signal tracing and performed a measurement of the
>>> reference oscillator signal on pin 1 of U4.  My reading is .51, instead
>>> of
>>> the expected 0.8-1.8. Vrms.
>>>
>>> So my question is this:
>>>
>>> It seems that the 12650 measurement is so high that it may be an
>>> indicator
>>> that the X1 crystal in the PLL oscillator is defective. However, with the
>>> low reading on pin 1 of U4 I'm not so sure about the crystal.  Could the
>>> increased frequency reading at TP3, cause the voltage drain on the U4 or
>>> am
>>> I barking up the wrong tree?
>>>
>>> I've looked through the email archives and haven't found anything quite
>>> similar to my issue.  I hate to start pulling stuff apart if the crystal
>>> is
>>> the issue and would like to hear what others think of the problem.
>>>  
>>>
>>>      
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>>    
>
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.722 / Virus Database: 270.14.120/2587 - Release Date: 12/26/09 03:27:00
>
>  
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL Reference Oscillator Question

bviets
Don,
I also took the liberty to do the checks on: RP2 pin 2, and the cathodes on D16 and D17 and they all behaved like U6 pin 1: 7.4 and zero when switching between BAND+ and BAND-.
73,
Byron
N6UI

bviets wrote
Don,
I did the voltage tests and they both checked out.  U6 was at 7.4, so a little under 8, but I would imagine that is within tolerance.  
73,
Byron
N6UI

Don Wilhelm-4 wrote
Byron,

Yes, that prior response may be helpful, but all may not apply to your
case - each one is different.
To be specific for your problem, first monitor the voltage from RF Board
U5 pin 7 while in CAL FCTR mode.  When tapping BAND+, the voltage should
go to about 4 volts and tapping BAND- should drop the voltage to near
zero volts.
If that is OK, then move on to U6 pin 1 - tapping BAND+ should produce
about 8 volts and BAND- should produce nearly zero volts.

Check those conditions first.  If those are all OK, then you can move on
to the varactor tests, but if there is a problem with the voltages
above, get back with me for additional tests and actions.

73,
Don W3FPR

bviets wrote:
> Hi Don,
> Thank you for your response.  When I try the freq. range test, there is no
> freq. change.  I searched the reflector and found an earlier email response
> authored by yourself with the subject of: K2 PLL range test SN 05233.  That
> person had a similar issue, so it would seem I can start tracking down the
> problem based on your diagnosis in that email.
> 73,
> Byron
> N6UI
>
>
>
> Don Wilhelm-4 wrote:
>  
>> Byron,
>>
>> Don't be too concerned about the 4 MHz oscillator calibration at this
>> point in your assembly process.  Once you have completed your K2, you
>> can refine the calibration - see the K2 Dial Calibration article on my
>> website www.w3fpr.com for "the rest of the story".
>>
>> Yes, 12650 is higher than the high end of the range should be, but
>> please tell me what the low range is - while in CAL FCTR, tap BAND+ and
>> tell me what the frequency is, then tap BAND- and again tell me what the
>> displayed frequency is.  Perhaps I can craft an answer to the possible
>> trouble spots from that information.
>>
>> 73,
>> Don W3FPR
>>
>> Byron Viets wrote:
>>    
>>> Hello everyone.  I purchased my K2 kit about 4 years ago and as life
>>> would
>>> have it, I rarely have time to work on the beast except during holidays
>>> etc.
>>>  More time for amateur radio would sure be nice, but I'm not near
>>> retirement
>>> and for some reason I keep getting pesky bills in the mail.  Anyway here
>>> is
>>> my situation:
>>>
>>> 1) I am at the Alignment and Test, Part II portion and trying to get
>>> through
>>> the 4 MHz Oscillator Calibration section.
>>> 2) When I take a freq. measurement at TP3 for the PLL with the frequency
>>> probe, I get a reading of ~12650, obviously way too high.
>>> 3) I inspected parts, soldering etc and cannot find a fault.
>>> 4) Decided to do some signal tracing and performed a measurement of the
>>> reference oscillator signal on pin 1 of U4.  My reading is .51, instead
>>> of
>>> the expected 0.8-1.8. Vrms.
>>>
>>> So my question is this:
>>>
>>> It seems that the 12650 measurement is so high that it may be an
>>> indicator
>>> that the X1 crystal in the PLL oscillator is defective. However, with the
>>> low reading on pin 1 of U4 I'm not so sure about the crystal.  Could the
>>> increased frequency reading at TP3, cause the voltage drain on the U4 or
>>> am
>>> I barking up the wrong tree?
>>>
>>> I've looked through the email archives and haven't found anything quite
>>> similar to my issue.  I hate to start pulling stuff apart if the crystal
>>> is
>>> the issue and would like to hear what others think of the problem.
>>>  
>>>
>>>      
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>>    
>
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.722 / Virus Database: 270.14.120/2587 - Release Date: 12/26/09 03:27:00
>
>  
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL Reference Oscillator Question

Don Wilhelm-4
Byron,

Fine on all that, so far so good - next is to check L31, X1, R21, D18,
C84 and C85 for good soldering, and make certain D16 and D17 are
oriented correctly.
If nothing is found awry, I would arbitrarily replace X1 as the first
step and after than D16 and D17.  Remember that this is just like a VXO
circuit, no real 'magic', you add capacitance (that is what the
varactors should be doing at lower voltages) and the frequency shifts
downward.

73,
Don W3FPR

bviets wrote:
> Don,
> I also took the liberty to do the checks on: RP2 pin 2, and the cathodes on
> D16 and D17 and they all behaved like U6 pin 1: 7.4 and zero when switching
> between BAND+ and BAND-.
> 73,
> Byron
> N6UI
>  
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL Reference Oscillator Question

bviets
Don,
Well everything checked out, i can't find any fault with the installation of those components.  Looks like I need to order some parts, unless you can think of anything else I should check.  If I haven't mentioned it, thank you for all of your help and attention.  
73,
Byron
N6UI


Don Wilhelm-4 wrote
Byron,

Fine on all that, so far so good - next is to check L31, X1, R21, D18,
C84 and C85 for good soldering, and make certain D16 and D17 are
oriented correctly.
If nothing is found awry, I would arbitrarily replace X1 as the first
step and after than D16 and D17.  Remember that this is just like a VXO
circuit, no real 'magic', you add capacitance (that is what the
varactors should be doing at lower voltages) and the frequency shifts
downward.

73,
Don W3FPR

bviets wrote:
> Don,
> I also took the liberty to do the checks on: RP2 pin 2, and the cathodes on
> D16 and D17 and they all behaved like U6 pin 1: 7.4 and zero when switching
> between BAND+ and BAND-.
> 73,
> Byron
> N6UI
>  
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL Reference Oscillator Question

bviets
Hello Don,

Hope you had a good New Year's.

I replaced X1 and subsequently D16 and D17, with no luck, still reading 12650.  Getting a little  frustrated.  Any suggestions?  
73,
Byron
N6UI

bviets wrote
Don,
Well everything checked out, i can't find any fault with the installation of those components.  Looks like I need to order some parts, unless you can think of anything else I should check.  If I haven't mentioned it, thank you for all of your help and attention.  
73,
Byron
N6UI


Don Wilhelm-4 wrote
Byron,

Fine on all that, so far so good - next is to check L31, X1, R21, D18,
C84 and C85 for good soldering, and make certain D16 and D17 are
oriented correctly.
If nothing is found awry, I would arbitrarily replace X1 as the first
step and after than D16 and D17.  Remember that this is just like a VXO
circuit, no real 'magic', you add capacitance (that is what the
varactors should be doing at lower voltages) and the frequency shifts
downward.

73,
Don W3FPR

bviets wrote:
> Don,
> I also took the liberty to do the checks on: RP2 pin 2, and the cathodes on
> D16 and D17 and they all behaved like U6 pin 1: 7.4 and zero when switching
> between BAND+ and BAND-.
> 73,
> Byron
> N6UI
>  
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html