PLL range (L31)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

PLL range (L31)

Mike Markowski
My K2 passed the PLL range test with 9.84 kHz, so it juuust surpasses
the 9.8 kHz lower limit and seems fine after some initial testing on
160m.  But while I have the radio pulled apart building the 100 W stage,
would it be worthwhile replacing L31 to get more comfortably in the
middle of the PLL range?  Or "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"?

Thanks very much,
Mike  AB3AP
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: PLL range (L31)

John, KI6WX
Mike;
The recommended minimum PLL reference range of 9.8 kHz provides plenty of
margin for operation on 160 meters.  There is no need to increase it beyond
that range.
-John
 KI6WX

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Markowski" <[hidden email]>


> My K2 passed the PLL range test with 9.84 kHz, so it juuust surpasses
> the 9.8 kHz lower limit and seems fine after some initial testing on
> 160m.  But while I have the radio pulled apart building the 100 W stage,
> would it be worthwhile replacing L31 to get more comfortably in the
> middle of the PLL range?  Or "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"?
>
> Thanks very much,
> Mike  AB3AP


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com