Portable Fit: K3 versus K2

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Portable Fit: K3 versus K2

Eric Manning
Yes, the K3 is light and rugged. On the other hand, it doesn't run on a
built-in battery.

I did a "light-weight" one-person DXpedition to  Bangladesh.  Mains
power on St Martin's Island [on the Bay of Bengal]
was a generator which ran only a few hours per day. So, the built-in
battery of the K2 allowed me to operate
long hours, and recharge from the generator while I was asleep.

The entire rig including battery chargers, key and mike
fir nicely into a small hardshell case the size of a laptop bag - cabin
baggage - and the Sigma 5 centre-fed vertical [which worked fb  on the beach
near the salt water] went into a sports bag which went as  checked
baggage. I used an early Sony palmtop [netbook-like] for logging.

eric VA7DZ
K3 3620
K2 XXX

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Portable Fit: K3 versus K2

John Harper AE5X
eric.manning at engr.uvic.ca said:>Yes, the K3 is light and rugged. You're
half right - it's light.

John Harper AE5X





______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Portable Fit: K3 versus K2

Grant Youngman
You want "rugged", buy a BC-312.  I'll take light :-)

Grant/NQ5T


On May 10, 2010, at 12:38 PM, John Harper wrote:

> eric.manning at engr.uvic.ca said:>Yes, the K3 is light and rugged. You're
> half right - it's light.
>
> John Harper AE5X
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Portable Fit: K3 versus K2

n7ws
I still have the BC-342 I started SWLing with in 1955.



--- On Mon, 5/10/10, Grant Youngman <[hidden email]> wrote:

You want "rugged", buy a BC-312.  I'll take light :-)

Grant/NQ5T





     
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Portable Fit: K3 versus K2

Ignacy
I have both K2 and K3.

K2 has traveled around the world and never a problem. It is my choice for CW and it is OK for noncompetitive SSB especially when conditions are good.

K3 had a few issues but its excellent speech processor plus EQ makes K3 a standout in SSB TX. Not being heard is a major problem when portable.

Ignacy