QUESTION- EQUIVALEBCE OF SYSTENS

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

QUESTION- EQUIVALEBCE OF SYSTENS

Larry-2
I am now using an Icom756proII and an electracraft 500 watt power amplifier. If I replace my Icom with the electracraft receiver-100 watt, what else will I need to have an equivalent system? thanks. k4mwe.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: QUESTION- EQUIVALEBCE OF SYSTENS

k6rb
Larry,

A K3 (with sub-receiver and ant tuner) and P3 with your KPA-500 would be
equivalent, functionally, to the IC 756 PRO II and KPA-500 you now have.
Of course, it would work a lot better because the K3's RX is superior to
the PRO II's (I think).

Rob K6RB


> I am now using an Icom756proII and an electracraft 500 watt power
> amplifier. If I replace my Icom with the electracraft receiver-100 watt,
> what else will I need to have an equivalent system? thanks. k4mwe.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: QUESTION- EQUIVALEBCE OF SYSTENS

wayne burdick
Administrator
[hidden email] wrote:

> Larry,
>
> A K3 (with sub-receiver and ant tuner) and P3 with your KPA-500  
> would be
> equivalent, functionally, to the IC 756 PRO II and KPA-500 you now  
> have.
> Of course, it would work a lot better because the K3's RX is  
> superior to
> the PRO II's (I think).


You can find both the K3 and the IC756 (all flavors) in Sherwood's  
comparison table:

   http://www.sherweng.com/table.html

Note that the K3's subreceiver has performance identical to its main  
receiver.

Wayne
N6KR


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html