I saw in one of the menus, something about setting a max TX CURRANT draw.
Minimum was 3 AMPS. Maximum can be set for 5.02 amps max TX draw. Yes, I do see why many k2 portable users would want to have maximum PA eff. when using 5W CW. Battery life can provide many cw qso's. My concerns are different. I always use the K2 at maximum output(15++W) What is the maximum rf out can you get. The finals in that configuration should be able to output almost 25W pep. True, you will no longer make commercial spec at 25W pep. A good heat sink would be required too. Anybody push the envelope? I find the TX range on CW between 15 W and a full power 100 W rig almost nil! On SSB, the range differential is more pronounced. I have installed in the top cover, a single MRF-453 50 W PA. This was an old RF PA I had in my junk box. Results have been not too great. I can get 30-45 W pep. I used a laptop computer lithium battery for good batt life at 40W. However this single ended bipolar amp will not meet FCC spec on spurs and two-tone IMD. So, I must go back to my first idea. See if I can get 25W pep SSB out of the k2's mil spec final. Any feedback welcome, tnx de MIKE WA2JJH _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
WA2JJH wrote:
I find the TX range on CW between 15 W and a full power 100 W rig almost nil!... See if I can get 25W pep SSB out of the k2's mil spec final. -------------- You'll need to redesign the output filters as well. They assume a certain collector impedance in the finals and that is a function of the power level and the K2's filters were designed for 10 watts. The impedance issue also affects the IMD in the finals. That's why Elecraft says not to exceed 10 watts PEP SSB even though running the power control up for as much as it'll deliver on CW is okay. Linearity isn't as important in CW. Lack of linearity will only affect the keying envelope somewhat. The difference between 10 and 100 watts is 10 dB. That's 1.5 to 3 "S" units on most receivers. The difference between 25 and 100 watts is 6 dB or 1 to 2 "S" units on most receivers. That's a big difference when signals are near the noise level or QRM is an issue. Otherwise it's not needed, as the QRP and QRPp stations demonstrate every day. SSB suffers from lower signal to noise ratios compared to CW at any power level, because the SSB signal occupies wider bandwidths. Narrower bandwidth with a given power = better S/N ratio. That's why closing down the CW filters helps pop a weak CW signal up out of the QRN. Since SSB needs 2+ kHz bandwidth for intelligible audio, the only fix to a weak signal is more power (and/or the use of some advanced filtering that doesn't restrict the bandwidth further such as the KDSP2 offers). The basic K2 SSB filter is already designed for a bandwidth of just over 2 kHz - the minimum for intelligible audio - to gain the best possible S/N ratio our of the SSB signal. Ron AC7AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |