Hi
It's with some degree of mirth that I read all the doomsday messages about the death of CW with them dropping the test over there in the States.......We had the same thing happen here a year or two back, and regardless of what all the "nay-sayers" had to say about it, CW is alive and well here, and in fact is growing. I suspect that some guys are giving CW a go now that the pressure to take it as a requirement for a license has disappeared. As for the lack of a CW test not filtering out the (dare I say it) "rabble", that is not entirely true either. A bloke (or YL) probably isn't going to bother taking the exam to come on air if he/she isn't interested in the first place. If they are a bit "green" compared with yesterdays lot, it is up to us to Elmer them in the ways and means of being an Amateur. Encouragement is the word guys...not abuse...we all had to start somewhere. I doubt Elecraft sale will drop, as there definitely are people out there right now who suddenly have the opportunity to put their electronic skills to work building a HF set because a door has been opened for them. Maybe not on CW just yet....but who knows? 73......Ron ZL1TW -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.22/590 - Release Date: 16/12/2006 5:39 p.m. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
I was one of the six members of the ARRL No-Code Study Committee
that put together the package that became the No-Code License. One of the items we discussed in the number of meetings we held was "should the use of CW be forbidden for No-Code License holders". Our conclusion was that such a rule would serve no purpose and would discourage licensees from even trying it. All the members of the committee were/are die-hard CW types, but we agreed that, as much as we might like to avoid the issue, it had to be dealt with. If it were left up to me, I would not have supported a no-code license, but it WAS going to come. Time has shown this to be true. What came out of the ARRL BOD that was submitted to the FCC was not eaxctly what we proposed ... there isn't a no-code provision for 160M, for example ... but all-in-all I think it's been OK. I consider the appointment to the committee by the ARRL to be the greatest honor I could have received in my 55 years in this wonderful hobby. Everything I am now and have in my life ... including my Lady N7HKW ... are directly related to Amateur Radio. 73! Ken Kopp - K0PP [hidden email] or [hidden email] _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |