Re: Elecraft Digest, Vol 17, Issue 4 On the iCW Debate

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Elecraft Digest, Vol 17, Issue 4 On the iCW Debate

Wa6bfh
I was not going to comment on this issue on such a forum, but the last most  
recent question and similar that I have seen on other Ham radio web forums  
prompts me to.
 
We should be more concerned with the technical standards, conceptual  
knowledge of Ham’s on matters of electronics and radio physics, and not at all  about
a motor-memory skill. As a matter of choice iCW is fine for those that  enjoy
it, or might use it in light of its ability to provide as high as a 16 dB  
signal advantage over some other modes. That is how I use it, and when I do am  
comfortable between 16 to about 23 words per minute.
 
We should be innovators of technology, which is our history and charter.  
Read FCC 97.1, particularly parts B, C, D. Worry less about iCW, it will survive  
on its own. This all is a matter of character and  conscience!

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com