|
Jack's measurements of the K3 AGC on the link listed below are quite
interesting. As my noise level on the low bands is usually at least S3 or 4, his plots indicate that the noise (S3 is approx -90 dBm) is either in the linear range of the AGC, or just barely in the software AGC range. Don't we really want the band noise in the flat part of the AGC curve, down near -130 dBm? Would operating with the ATT on and/or the RF gain turned down help move the band noise to this part of the curve, resulting in a higher S/N ratio for signals just above the background noise? Steve N9SZ Barry N1EU wrote: >Steven.Zabarnick wrote: >> >> I'm somewhat puzzled by the behavior of the AGC THR adjustment with >> respect >> to band noise. My understanding is that the AGC THR setting adjusts the >> level at which the AGC is activated. Thus, I would expect when listening >> to >> band noise (QRN) that if the noise is activating the AGC, using a higher >> number would prevent AGC activation, resulting in a lower background band >> noise. >> >A higher number means that AGC compression begins at a higher signal level, >so a higher number means you'll hear more noise. > >take a look at the graphs at >http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/elecraft_k3_agc_and_s-meter.htm#AGC_SLP_and_AGC_THR > >73, >Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
Steve,
If you attempt to use AGC to change the noise level, you will also be potentially pushing all the signals down to that level as well (how much so depends on the amount of AGC slope you have dialed in. A receiver's sensitivity is measured at the antenna input end, and if I understand correctly. what you are proposing can only change the level at the output (speaker or headphones). The receiver sensitivity can be related to its internal noise level (for any given gain, more internal noise reduces the sensitivity at the input) - and that is a very different thing than band noise. The amount of noise picked up by the antenna and fed to the receiver is effectively 'just another signal'. If the band noise is a -90 dBm, one would ideally want the AGC threshold to be at something above that - say -85 dBm for best reception (no matter what the meters are indicating). Set that way, signals will activate the AGC and not the noise - the human ear/brain can perceive signals down to (and below) the noise floor with a little practice. With band noise at -90 dBm, the K3 receiver sensitivity is still -140 dBm, but the band noise covers up actual signals until their level is greater than -90 dBm, no receiver can change that situation. If band noise activates the AGC, the receiver will not hear as well because the AGC has reduced its gain. Band noise is just another 'signal', but unlike real signals it is broadband and unwanted. 73, Don W3FPR [hidden email] wrote: > Jack's measurements of the K3 AGC on the link listed below are quite > interesting. As my noise level on the low bands is usually at least S3 or > 4, his plots indicate that the noise (S3 is approx -90 dBm) is either in > the linear range of the AGC, or just barely in the software AGC range. > Don't we really want the band noise in the flat part of the AGC curve, > down near -130 dBm? Would operating with the ATT on and/or the RF gain > turned down help move the band noise to this part of the curve, resulting > in a higher S/N ratio for signals just above the background noise? > > Steve N9SZ > > > Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
