In a message dated 9/14/07 7:38:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [hidden email]
writes: > in 1971 210,000 would have been pretty close to actual number, in US. More like 275,000. Here are some numbers to think about while waiting for the sunspots to come back and the K3s to start shipping: US population vs. hams - (numbers are rounded off, accurate to within 2%) 1930: US population 122 million, US hams 18,000, 1 ham per 6778 Americans 1940: US population 131 million, US hams 50,000, 1 ham per 2620 Americans 1950: US population 150 million, US hams 90,000, 1 ham per 1667 Americans 1960: US population 179 million, US hams 230,000, 1 ham per 779 Americans 1970: US population 223 million, US hams 270,000, 1 ham per 825 Americans 1980: US population 227 million, US hams 350,000, 1 ham per 649 Americans 1990: US population 249 million US hams 550,000, 1 ham per 453 Americans 2000: US population 281 million, US hams 683,000, 1 ham per 411 Americans 2007: US population 301 million, US hams 655,000, 1 ham per 460 Americans Note the tremendous growth (compared to the total population) in the 1930s despite the Great Depression, the fast growth of the '50s followed by the loss of the 1960s, and then the steady growth from 1970 to 1990. 73 de Jim, N2EY ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In a message dated 9/14/07 11:05:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[hidden email] writes: > One might find it very interesting to compare the annual income per family, > during the times shown. Yes, but it would have to be adjusted for inflation. Back in the 1950s, a gross family income of $5,000/yr was solidly middle-class, and $10,000/yr was Easy Street. I would even further offer that it may be that the harder it is for families to make a > "good" living, the easier it is for folks to become hams. > You're obviously looking at the enormous growth of the 1930s, despite the Great Depression. I don't have a simple explanation of why there was so much growth then. But if the family-income theory is true, why so much growth in the 1950s and so little in the 1960s? Why the downturn in recent years? It seems to me that the biggest change in "personal economics" in my lifetime has been a sort of inversion of the cost of necessities and luxuries. When I was a kid, 40-50 years ago) it seemed that necessities (food, clothing, housing, transportation, utilities, energy, health care) were relatively inexpensive. Particularly if you went for the basic model and took care of it yourself. But luxuries (TV, vacations, restaurants, ham radio, etc.) were relatively expensive, unless you were somewhat ingenious. Now it seems that the necessities are expensive and the luxuries inexpensive! Almost everyone can have a computer, iPod, etc., but the house to put them in is another story. What this meant to ham radio was that, in the past, lots of folks had a home with room for a decent antenna and shack, but not a lot of money for a fancy rig. So there were lots of articles and examples of how to do ham radio on a shoestring budget, and they were practical because of the economics of the time. A lot of hams homebrewed, converted surplus and built kits because there was simply no other affordable option. (How many of us built an Elecraft to save money, compared to those who built one for its performance?) I suspect that for every ham with an S-line on the air there were a dozen hams with ARC-5s and S-38s. Today it's the other way around! I think there are lots of other factors, many of them complicated. For example, in the 1930s there were lots of inexpensive parts on the market, partly because of mass-production techniques developed for broadcasting and partly because of business failures. After WW2, and well into the 1970s, there was an enormous amount of war-surplus parts and equipment around at low prices. Sunspot peaks and lows have a considerable effect. I think a lot has to do with people's living situations. In the 1930s, putting up a wire for your radio set was something everyone did. Now it's forbidden in many places! In the 1950s, a lot of Americans were moving out to the 'burbs, with lots of room and no restrictions. That's changed greatly. 73 de Jim, N2EY ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |