Re: K1 Relays Not Working (Richard Crispi)

[Marc PE1FJN]

Hello Richard,

I can give it a try to help you debugging the problem. I have some time (hi)
just completed an K1 upgrade KFL1-4, now QRV on 40m/30m/20m/17m!!

No Relays functioning, most likely U1 is not running its program, or does
not receive commands via AUX bus.

Question: Are you able to turn on/off the attennuator? Also the the
Attenuator is controlled by the microcontroller on the filter board.

I assume you can not.

--> U1 is not running it's program

Please double check:

1) P1 and P2, if you have all soldered, did not miss a pin. P2 contains
signals that makes communciation with the main controller possible.
2) Especially verify 6R/Aux signal from Main U1 pin8 to Filter U1 pin 13
RB7, did you forget the 100ohm?? R1
3) Double check if resonator is correct mounted?

Please let me know your next update on troubleshooting. Also let me know
what measuremetn tols you have, DMM, Anloge meter, Oscilloscope, I will
adjust my next feedback on your tools.

73
PE1FJN
Marc
K1: SN2761



----- Original Message -----
From: <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 6:00 PM
Subject: Elecraft Digest, Vol 110, Issue 41

> Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to
> [hidden email]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [hidden email]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [hidden email]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Colorado to New Zealand on 10 watts (Scotty Long)
>   2. Re: OT:   2m beam orientation (Walter Underwood)
>   3. Re: How to reply to specific post on the reflector?
>      (Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft)
>   4. K2 sn 4900-5000 - Upgrades needed? (iw7dmh)
>   5. KX3 - Omit battery holder? (Chris Meagher)
>   6. Re: How to determine K3 filter type - 5-pole or 8-pole
>      (Oliver Dr?se)
>   7. Re: Colorado to New Zealand on 10 watts (Fred Smith)
>   8. Re: KX3 - Omit battery holder? (Fred Smith)
>   9. Watsonville (Gary Gregory)
>  10. OT: Mac OS X 10.8.4 Question (Joel Black)
>  11. K1 Relays Not Working (Richard Crispi)
>  12. Re: K2 sn 4900-5000 - Upgrades needed? (Bill W4ZV)
>  13. Re: Watsonville (Dick Dievendorff)
>  14. Re: The K line. Is it the wrong way round? (N4OI - Ken)
>  15. Re: K2 sn 4900-5000 - Upgrades needed? (Don Wilhelm)
>  16. Re: For Sale Elecraft k3 & P3 AND Icom IC-7600 (on4iq)
>  17. Re: FS Elecraft K3/100 y ICOM IC-756PRO 3 [hidden email] (on4iq)
>  18. Re: For Sale Elecraft k3 & P3 AND Icom IC-7600 (on4iq)
>  19. Re: FS Elecraft K3/100  & ICOM IC-756PRO III. (on4iq)
>  20. Re: FS Elecraft K3/100 y ICOM IC-756PRO 3 [hidden email] (on4iq)
>  21. Thanks- FTDI Driver information (Richard W Hemingway)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:52:52 -0500
> From: Scotty Long <[hidden email]>
> Cc: <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Colorado to New Zealand on 10 watts
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> That's very cool Doug, have a great weekend and safe field day...Hope to
> work you...
>
> 72/73/Scotty/NU?S
>
>
> Doug Person <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Well, I just replaced my 12 year old buried feed line with some new
> double-shielded RG-8X.  Just to test it out, I connected the antenna
> system to the KX3.  My antenna system consists of 3 trap dipoles: 80/40,
> 30/17/12 and 20/15/10.  I switched to 17 and tuned around.  I heard
> ZL1BD calling CQ.  After a few tries Al came back to me with 100% copy.
> I wouldn't exactly call the band wide open.  But, that was a very
> impressive QSO. For me, after 52 years of hamming - that was a record
> breaker.
>
> See? QRP DOES work!
>
> vry 72, de Doug K0DXV
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:14:20 -0700
> From: Walter Underwood <[hidden email]>
> To: Elecraft Discussion List <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT:   2m beam orientation
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 8:08 PM, Phil Kane wrote:
>
>> "Computing in a cloud" is nothing more than an updated version of
>> mainframe-and-terminals from back in the 60s.  Now where did I put that
>> VT-100 ??  <G>
>
>
> Not even close. I've done both and they are categorically different.
> Mainframes were single highly-reliable, very fast, extremely expensive
> systems. The cloud is a swarm of unreliable slow systems. My laptop is
> faster than most of our cloud instances. Systems need a total redesign to
> run well in a cloud.
>
> wunder
> --
> Walter Underwood
> K6WRU
> CM87wj
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:55:50 -0700
> From: Eric Swartz  WA6HHQ - Elecraft <[hidden email]>
> To: Josh Fiden <[hidden email]>
> Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] How to reply to specific post on the
> reflector?
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Thread killed.
>
> Guys, please be more respectful of each other, even when disagreeing.
>
> Eric
> List Moderator
> elecraft.com
> _..._
>
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Josh Fiden <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Exactly! That's the right answer.
>>
>> Please kill this thread!
>>
>> 73,
>> Josh W6XU
>>
>> On 6/21/2013 4:35 PM, Jim Lowman wrote:
>>> the burden is on the sender to ensure that the reply goes where it is
>>> intended to go.
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
> From: iw7dmh <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [Elecraft] K2 sn 4900-5000 - Upgrades needed?
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Good morning,
>
> I'm planning to buy a used K2 with serial numbers between 4900 and 5000.
> I would like to ask what are the upgrades I need to make it equal to the
> current K2.
>
> 73' enzo
> iw7dmh
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K2-sn-4900-5000-Upgrades-needed-tp7575646.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:16:08 +1000
> From: Chris Meagher <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 - Omit battery holder?
> Message-ID:
> <CACUxFb8KGv0=ZD0MYtqbbf+aep19xhoQG3xxStB2rT=[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I'm presently at the stage of fitting battery holders into the KX3.
> I'm dubious about the amount of flexing that the holders have to take, in
> order to get the screws secure.
> This is more of a problem with the holder that sits over the square
> shield,
> as it has to bend over the shield.
> I rather don't like the way this is engineered.
>
> Seeing that I'm averse to internal batteries anyway, previous bad
> experience with portable gear, and having read the warnings of potential
> serious damage if something goes awry with the holder, I plan to omit the
> holders altogether.
>
> The question is - can I fit the holders screws threaded all the way in, so
> that the heads touch the board, and not suffer some shorting problem? I
> think it would be OK, but would like informed opinion just in case.
>
> Many thanks reflector people
>
> Chris VK2ACD   K2#3666, K3/10 #685, KX3#4559
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 10:02:37 +0200
> From: Oliver Dr?se <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>, "Mike Flowers" <[hidden email]>
> Cc: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] How to determine K3 filter type - 5-pole or
> 8-pole
> Message-ID: <C6F462D6936B4F47B207D7A64F942412@dh8bqax60>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
>
> Not a 100% safe way to tell so. A lot of OPs (myself included) let their
> filters switch in earlier already. I.e. my 400 Hz 8 pole filter is
> switched
> in at 500 Hz DSP bandwidth (exactly that is reflected in the filter setup
> in
> K3 Utility) already so with Don's suggestion you would think it's a 5 pole
> filter - not true. The most reliable way is certainly the checking the
> filters themselves, i.e. hardware. Offset settings *might* be another way
> as
> 8 pole filters normally do not have an offset while 5 poles have. But even
> that might not be 100% ... so take a look at the hardware and be sure what
> you have. ;-)
>
> 73, Olli - DH8BQA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]>
> To: "Mike Flowers" <[hidden email]>
> Cc: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] How to determine K3 filter type - 5-pole or 8-pole
>
>
>> Mike,
>>
>> The K3 Utility configuration tab can tell you which filters are
>> installed.
>> You can tell from the filter width whether it is an 8 pole or a 5 pole -
>> compare the installed widths with the filter listing on the Elecraft
>> order
>> page (that page specifies 5 pole and 8 pole).
>>
>> 73,
>> Don W3FPR
>>
>> On 6/21/2013 3:53 PM, Mike Flowers wrote:
>>> Hi Gang,
>>>
>>> I recently bought a used K3 which has filters installed in both the main
>>> and sub receivers.
>>>
>>> Is there an external way of determining if these filters are 5-pole or
>>> 8-pole?
>>>
>>> Is the value of FLx FRQ for each filter a clue?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your assistance!
>>> *
>>>
>>> 73 de Mike, K6MKF
>>> *
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>> -----
>> E-Mail ist virenfrei.
>> Von AVG uberpruft - www.avg.de
>> Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virendatenbank: 3199/6429 - Ausgabedatum:
>> 21.06.2013
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 03:38:08 -0500
> From: "Fred Smith" <[hidden email]>
> To: "'Doug Person'" <[hidden email]>, <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Colorado to New Zealand on 10 watts
> Message-ID: <001b01ce6f23$d38d14a0$7aa73de0$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Doug
>
> I have replaced all my cable both above and buried with LMR-400 series
> coax.
> In fact after doing testing I now use the DXE series MAX400 (best prices
> and
> free shipping) same properties and you get it all in one coax DB/UF/400
> combined. I recently replaced about 500' of older 7 yr old coax for it on
> towers and buried. For QRP I always use the lowest loss coax at home where
> I
> have longer than 10-15' of coax.
>
> I don't want to lose any of my signal from the antenna to the radio so I
> always use the best coax I can for all HF apps, coax is cheap for what it
> does and you expect of it.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Doug Person
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:03 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [Elecraft] Colorado to New Zealand on 10 watts
>
> Well, I just replaced my 12 year old buried feed line with some new
> double-shielded RG-8X.  Just to test it out, I connected the antenna
> system
> to the KX3.  My antenna system consists of 3 trap dipoles: 80/40,
> 30/17/12 and 20/15/10.  I switched to 17 and tuned around.  I heard ZL1BD
> calling CQ.  After a few tries Al came back to me with 100% copy.
> I wouldn't exactly call the band wide open.  But, that was a very
> impressive
> QSO. For me, after 52 years of hamming - that was a record breaker.
>
> See? QRP DOES work!
>
> vry 72, de Doug K0DXV
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 3199/6429 - Release Date: 06/21/13
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 3199/6429 - Release Date: 06/21/13
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 04:02:07 -0500
> From: "Fred Smith" <[hidden email]>
> To: "'Chris Meagher'" <[hidden email]>,
> <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 - Omit battery holder?
> Message-ID: <001c01ce6f27$2d21ca80$87655f80$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Chris
>
> If you choose not to install the batteries you will be losing one of the
> major functions of this fine radio and true portable operation. Another
> problem is the clock and the memory without batteries to maintain them and
> all the settings.
>
> If you plan to have external power hooked to it at all times you will fine
> with no power outages. Out of the thousands sold I have never saw a post
> by
> anyone who didn't have a battery holder. I would never remove mine for
> sure
> and have 3 extra sets of batteries ready and charged to go in if needed
> plus
> a 7 ah for a spare.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Chris Meagher
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 2:16 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 - Omit battery holder?
>
> I'm presently at the stage of fitting battery holders into the KX3.
> I'm dubious about the amount of flexing that the holders have to take, in
> order to get the screws secure.
> This is more of a problem with the holder that sits over the square
> shield,
> as it has to bend over the shield.
> I rather don't like the way this is engineered.
>
> Seeing that I'm averse to internal batteries anyway, previous bad
> experience
> with portable gear, and having read the warnings of potential serious
> damage
> if something goes awry with the holder, I plan to omit the holders
> altogether.
>
> The question is - can I fit the holders screws threaded all the way in, so
> that the heads touch the board, and not suffer some shorting problem? I
> think it would be OK, but would like informed opinion just in case.
>
> Many thanks reflector people
>
> Chris VK2ACD   K2#3666, K3/10 #685, KX3#4559
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 3199/6429 - Release Date: 06/21/13
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:03:37 +1000
> From: Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
> To: Elecraft List <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] Watsonville
> Message-ID:
> <CA+MFBaH_OZM_Q+oELP4x4FUYxEwrkdcDpO+N=[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Any Hotels in or near Watsonville/Aptos would anyone know?
>
> Gary
>
> --
> *Gary - VK1ZZ
> Skype: Gary.VK1ZZ
> http://www.qsl.net/vk1zz
> Motorhome Portable
> The Shack*
> *Elecraft K3
> P3 Panadapter
> KPA500FT
> KAT500FT**
>
> *
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 06:21:21 -0500
> From: Joel Black <[hidden email]>
> To: elecraft <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] OT: Mac OS X 10.8.4 Question
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Would someone contact me off list regarding an issue with applications
> showing up in the Applications folder but not in Launchpad?
>
> Sorry for the BW, but the smartest folks I know are on this list.
>
> Thank you.
>
> 73,
> Joel - W4JBB
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 07:40:00 -0400
> From: Richard Crispi <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [Elecraft] K1 Relays Not Working
> Message-ID:
> <CAK1=OV-okcvD8XS=5L1eJeC=[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi,
> I'm in the process of building K1 #3224 and all was going well until this
> evening.  I'm at the point in Chap. 7 Alignment and Test, Part 1
> "Band-Pass
> Filter Alignment" (pg. 40).  I was able to align B1 (40 meters) but when I
> attempted to start B2 (30 meters) I realized that the relays were not
> switching and I could still hear the 40 meter signals although the
> frequency display showed the 30 meter frequency.  Everything else up to
> this point seems to be working fine but no relays are switching; not on
> power up or when I try to change bands.
> All the resistance checks I did according to the manual were right on.  I
> checked for misplaced components, shorts, unsoldered components,
> components
> in backwards or in the wrong place on the filter board but everything
> checks out OK.
> I measured the voltages on U1 on the filter board and got the following:
> Pin1     0v
> Pin2     0v
> Pin3     0.85v
> Pin 4     5.94v
> Pin 5-12    0v
> Pin 13    5.5v
> Pin 14    5.9v
> Pin 15    2.2v
> Pin 16    2.1v
> Pin 17-18    0v
> I was powering the radio with 12.9 volts.
> According to the DC voltage table on pg 7 Appendix E the only voltages
> that
> are off are the voltages on pins 15 and 16.  According to the filter board
> schematic in Appendix B these two pins connect to Z1 the resonator.
> Any ideas?
> Regards,
> Rich Crispi K1YRW
>
> <[hidden email]>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 05:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Bill W4ZV <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 sn 4900-5000 - Upgrades needed?
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Ciao Enzo,
>
> The last major mod to the K2 was for S/N 4060 and above using Revision B
> PCB, so you should be OK with S/Ns above 4900.  There have been a few
> other
> worthwhile mods such as setting AGC level and the Magnetic Level Shielding
> Kit but these are not absolutely necessary for most applications.  LA3ZA
> has
> a very nice summary of most K2 mods with links here:
>
> http://www.qslnet.de/member/la3za/K2/modAny.html
>
> 73,  Bill  W4ZV
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K2-sn-4900-5000-Upgrades-needed-tp7575646p7575654.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 05:18:13 -0700
> From: Dick Dievendorff <[hidden email]>
> To: Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>
> Cc: Elecraft List <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Watsonville
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Seacliff inn. See http:www.seacliffinn.com
>
>
> 73 de Dick, K6KR
>
>
> On Jun 22, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Any Hotels in or near Watsonville/Aptos would anyone know?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> --
>> *Gary - VK1ZZ
>> Skype: Gary.VK1ZZ
>> http://www.qsl.net/vk1zz
>> Motorhome Portable
>> The Shack*
>> *Elecraft K3
>> P3 Panadapter
>> KPA500FT
>> KAT500FT**
>>
>> *
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 05:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: N4OI - Ken <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] The K line. Is it the wrong way round?
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Roger Crofts wrote
>> ... I had the P3 directly in front, but I had to reach to the left for
>> all
>> the important controls. I had the bright idea of switching the positions
>> of the KPA500 and the K3. It was much better. My right hand fell
>> naturally
>> upon the tuning controls. ... 73 Roger, VK4YB
>
> It says something about the quality of Elecraft gear when this is the only
> suggestion I can make  .  I have the K3 / P3 components of the K-Line and
> quickly found that the K3 MUST be positioned to the right of the P3 for
> right-handed ops like myself.   This makes the two become one -- as my
> face
> is directly in front of the P3, my right hand operates the K3.   The
> criticism is that the  handle is now squished right in the middle.  It
> would
> make more sense to have the little rubber feet be between the P3 and K3
> when
> the K3 is on the right -- or at least punch the holes so the operator
> could
> have the option during assembly.
>
> Regardless, I find the K3/P3 combo to be the most intuitive panadapter
> setup
> I have used.  I built a SoftRock Ensemble II Rx recently and I find the
> PC-based panadapters with the mouse controls to be very cumbersome -- all
> that clicking around and twirling the mouse wheel.  Also, the small P3
> screen is just the right size for where my eyes are positioned up next to
> the rig...  sometimes bigger is not better.
>
> And yes, I was reminded of how great the Elecraft Kool-Aid is this morning
> after firing up my trusty K1 -- keep 'em coming guys!
>
> 73 ES GOD BLESS U ES URS DE KEN N4OI
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/The-K-line-Is-it-the-wrong-way-round-tp7575529p7575656.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 08:53:14 -0400
> From: Don Wilhelm <[hidden email]>
> To: iw7dmh <[hidden email]>
> Cc: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 sn 4900-5000 - Upgrades needed?
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> None,
>
> That K2 has all the upgrades on it already.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
> On 6/22/2013 2:42 AM, iw7dmh wrote:
>> Good morning,
>>
>> I'm planning to buy a used K2 with serial numbers between 4900 and 5000.
>> I would like to ask what are the upgrades I need to make it equal to the
>> current K2.
>>
>> 73' enzo
>> iw7dmh
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K2-sn-4900-5000-Upgrades-needed-tp7575646.html
>> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 06:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
> From: on4iq <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] For Sale Elecraft k3 & P3 AND Icom IC-7600
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> this is a scam, same add appeared on several other sites
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/For-Sale-Elecraft-k3-P3-AND-Icom-IC-7600-tp7575064p7575658.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 06:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
> From: on4iq <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FS Elecraft K3/100 y ICOM IC-756PRO 3
> [hidden email]
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> this is a scam, see other posts for this material
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/FS-Elecraft-K3-100-y-ICOM-IC-756PRO-3-kc6wir-yahoo-com-tp7573821p7575659.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 06:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
> From: on4iq <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] For Sale Elecraft k3 & P3 AND Icom IC-7600
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> This is a scam, see other relayed posts
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/For-Sale-Elecraft-k3-P3-AND-Icom-IC-7600-tp7575062p7575660.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 06:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
> From: on4iq <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FS Elecraft K3/100  & ICOM IC-756PRO III.
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> yet another scam
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/FS-Elecraft-K3-100-ICOM-IC-756PRO-III-tp7573126p7575661.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 06:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
> From: on4iq <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FS Elecraft K3/100 y ICOM IC-756PRO 3
> [hidden email]
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> yet another scam
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/FS-Elecraft-K3-100-y-ICOM-IC-756PRO-3-kc6wir-yahoo-com-tp7573819p7575662.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 21
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 08:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Richard W Hemingway <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [Elecraft] Thanks- FTDI Driver information
> Message-ID:
> <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Thanks to everyone who gave advice and information on FTDI drivers for
> Mountain Lion OS for Mac.  I really appreciate it.
>
> Dick, N5XRD
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [hidden email]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> You must be a subscriber to post.
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
> End of Elecraft Digest, Vol 110, Issue 41
> *****************************************

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html