Re: K2 Firmware Suggestion--Permitting Separate VFOFilterSettings

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2 Firmware Suggestion--Permitting Separate VFOFilterSettings

Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy-2
Me too (third it)!
It would be useful as well if one could go from say FL4 straight back to FL3
(for one VFO) without having to go to FL1, then FL2 to get back to FL3 - or
am I missing something and it can be done?

73,
Geoff
GM4ESD

Tried to post before but the 'policemen' are blocking me.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Althoff" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 11:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware Suggestion--Permitting Separate
> VFOFilterSettings
>
>
>>I second this motion!
>>
>> The only thing I can think of that might be a problem is maintaining QSK
>> performance.  That and the unknown ammount of area left for addional code
>> in
>> the firmware itself.
>>
>> Wayne... A motion has been made and seconded.   Can we take a vote and
>> then
>> a response from the chair?
>>
>> Tom K2TA
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <[hidden email]>
>> To: <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:02 AM
>> Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware Suggestion--Permitting Separate VFO
>> FilterSettings
>>
>>
>>> Since Wayne and Eric are always looking for ideas from the peanut
>>> gallery, here's my first K2 firmware suggestion.
>>>
>>> When DXing and operating split (VFO A tuned to the DX station, VFO B on
>>> the QSX frequency), it would be nice to be able to use a narrow filter
>>> on
>>> VFO A while using a wider filter on VFO B.  This would allow DXers to
>>> keep the DX signal free of QRM with a narrow filter while tuning for
>>> stations working the DX using a wider filter.
>>>
>>> That's my operating preference--narrow filter on the DX's frequency,
>>> wide
>>> filter while searching for just the right QSX frequency in pileups.
>>>
>>> Still having a great time with K2/100 S/N 5023, if I bought a second rig
>>> right now it'd be another K2.
>>>
>>> Good luck to all Elecrafters trying to work 6O0N over the next two
>>> weeks.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> John, N7ON
>>>



_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2 Firmware Suggestion--Permitting Separate VFOFilterSettings

Charles Greene-2
Hi Goeff,

Aside from pushing buttons on the front panel, what you suggest is
possible under software control, using HRD, N4PY, or even MixW, using
your own macros.

73,  Chas, W1CG

At 07:41 AM 1/21/2006, Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy wrote:

>Me too (third it)!
>It would be useful as well if one could go from say FL4 straight back to FL3
>(for one VFO) without having to go to FL1, then FL2 to get back to FL3 - or
>am I missing something and it can be done?
>
>73,
>Geoff
>GM4ESD
>
>Tried to post before but the 'policemen' are blocking me.
>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Althoff" <[hidden email]>
>>To: <[hidden email]>
>>Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 11:01 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware Suggestion--Permitting Separate
>>VFOFilterSettings
>>
>>
>>>I second this motion!
>>>
>>>The only thing I can think of that might be a problem is maintaining QSK
>>>performance.  That and the unknown ammount of area left for addional code in
>>>the firmware itself.
>>>
>>>Wayne... A motion has been made and seconded.   Can we take a vote and then
>>>a response from the chair?
>>>
>>>Tom K2TA
>>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- From: <[hidden email]>
>>>To: <[hidden email]>
>>>Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:02 AM
>>>Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Firmware Suggestion--Permitting Separate VFO
>>>FilterSettings
>>>
>>>
>>>>Since Wayne and Eric are always looking for ideas from the peanut
>>>>gallery, here's my first K2 firmware suggestion.
>>>>
>>>>When DXing and operating split (VFO A tuned to the DX station, VFO B on
>>>>the QSX frequency), it would be nice to be able to use a narrow filter on
>>>>VFO A while using a wider filter on VFO B.  This would allow DXers to
>>>>keep the DX signal free of QRM with a narrow filter while tuning for
>>>>stations working the DX using a wider filter.
>>>>
>>>>That's my operating preference--narrow filter on the DX's frequency, wide
>>>>filter while searching for just the right QSX frequency in pileups.
>>>>
>>>>Still having a great time with K2/100 S/N 5023, if I bought a second rig
>>>>right now it'd be another K2.
>>>>
>>>>Good luck to all Elecrafters trying to work 6O0N over the next two weeks.
>>>>
>>>>73,
>>>>
>>>>John, N7ON
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Post to: [hidden email]
>You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com