Re: K3, Orion, Orion II comparison

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3, Orion, Orion II comparison

Ken817821
Not that it really matters, I had the inrad 600 cycle filter in the 1 khz slot.  Thats why I had a 600 cycle filter.  I have now sold the Orion II, and use the Orion at one location and the K3  at another location.  I would not hesitate to use any of the three rigs in any contest.  They are all excellent.
 
The orion is bigger, but not necessarily more user friendly.   The K3 is every inch as good.   Both are easy to train the fingers and become second nature. 
 
On being convenient to operate, I give a slight edge to the K3 even with it's small face.
 
Current software support and future improvements - no comparison, K3 wins hands down.
Ken K5WK
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- On Fri, 12/12/08, [hidden email] <[hidden email]> wrote:
My comparisons were looking almost exclusively at the ability of the three rigs
to handle weak signals under crowded conditions.  On CW the tightest
CW  filter on the Orion was 600 cycles, and 200 cycles on the K3.
 
My conclusions are simple:
I was never able to find any signal no matter how weak that could not be
copied on all three rigs.  They are all excellent weak signal rigs.
 
Ken K5WK
Messages in this topic (4)
___________
1d. Re: K3 and Orion and Orion II comparison
    Posted by: "bill_w4zv" [hidden email] bill_w4zv
    Date: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:52 pm ((PST))

--- In [hidden email], Kenneth Waites <barbiekenw@...>
wrote:

> On CW the tightest CW  filter on the Orion was 600 cycles, and 200
cycles on the K3.

For the record, that's incorrect.  Orion II has an optional 300 Hz
filter.  I also had an Orion and would rate the RF performance very
similar.  

The ergonomics, frequency of firmware updates, modularity (i.e. I'm
not forced to pay for FM, General Coverage, AM, etc) and many
additional features (e.g. True Diversity, a *GOOD* Sub RX, DUAL PB,
excellent bandscope via LP-PAN, computerless digital, etc) make the K3
a clear choice IMHO.  The amazing support of Elecraft also puts the K3
in a class all by itself.

73,  Bill



Ken K5WK

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3, Orion, Orion II comparison

Barry N1EU
Kenneth Waites wrote
I have now sold the Orion II, and use the Orion at one location and the K3  at another location.  I would not hesitate to use any of the three rigs in any contest.  They are all excellent.
Agree that the Orion is a fine radio, but the K3's receiver(s) got it beat in a crowded contest.  Do a few serious contest efforts on the K3 and you'll see.  

73,
Barry N1EU