TJ,
It "may be" right. But without your refcal values, can't say for sure.
However, your results do seem to be lower than typical by a factor of 10.
You may have missed a decimal point somewhere. i.e. a more expected offset
would be 470 or 490 Hz, not the 47 or 49 you indicate. Check your math,
and/or post your refcal value.
The proper setting of the refcal calibration is important as a first step,
also.
73,
Bruce, N1RX
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Locked
