Hi Everybody! My MH2 Mic is missing in action. I'm sure that whoever has
it now needs it much more than I do. What is the hand Mic of choice amongst this august group? Any suggestions are most welcome. Best Regards, Bob K7HBG _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
> What is the hand Mic of choice
> amongst this august group? Any suggestions are most > welcome. > Best Regards, Bob K7HBG Bob - I was making an adapter to use my MD2 desk mike with both my K2 and my Pegasus. An email to Bob Heil confirmed my suspicion that the MD2 was the same as Heil's "iC" amplified mikes for Icom rigs. Thus, any Heil mike with the "iC" suffix would be a functional equivalent to the Elecraft MH2 or MD2. A visit to Heil's web site doesn't show any hand mikes, which may explain why the MH2 was discontinued. But, there is the little Handi Mic HM-"iC" that looks like a good alternative. 73 de NA8M John _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
An amusing aside to this thread, when I built the SSB board for my K2, the
only mic I had on hand was one from an old Tempo VHF-1 2 meter rig. This microphone is identical to many of the older CB microphones, and has a 600 ohm, unamplified, dynamic cartridge. I hooked up the MIC hot & ground, PTT hot & ground to an 8 pin connector according to the Kenwood MIC pinout, and just used little computer jumpers to short the pins straight across on the K2's control board. In the initial tests, everyone that I talked with said it sounded great and not to change a thing. Later I borrowed an MH2 and was able to run comparisons. I was astounded when, in 10 QSO's on SSB, ALL of them told me the old Tempo VHF-1 microphone sounded better. The MH2 had plenty of punch and all, but the audio quality of the CB style microphone was better on my voice. It just goes to show that the K2 doesn't need a fancy, expensive microphone to sound good on the air. Pick up a $2.00 CB hand mic at a hamfest, wire it to fit and operate. Quit arguing over which microphone sounds better, you are losing valuable operating time! Jim Sheldon, W0EB > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of John Huffman > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 5:37 AM > To: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Replacement Hand Microphone > > > > What is the hand Mic of choice > > amongst this august group? Any suggestions are most > > welcome. > > Best Regards, Bob K7HBG > > > > Bob - > > I was making an adapter to use my MD2 desk mike with both my > K2 and my Pegasus. An email to Bob Heil confirmed my > suspicion that the MD2 was the same as Heil's "iC" amplified > mikes for Icom rigs. Thus, any Heil mike with the "iC" > suffix would be a functional equivalent to the Elecraft MH2 > or MD2. > > A visit to Heil's web site doesn't show any hand mikes, > which may explain why the MH2 was discontinued. But, there > is the little Handi Mic HM-"iC" that looks like a good > alternative. > > 73 de NA8M > John > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
I didn't wanna say anything but I get better audio reports with a Radio Shack el-cheapo mic than I do with the MH2 with my voice. RonE. WØIFL. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Sheldon" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 06:03 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Replacement Hand Microphone An amusing aside to this thread, when I built the SSB board for my K2, the only mic I had on hand was one from an old Tempo VHF-1 2 meter rig. This microphone is identical to many of the older CB microphones, and has a 600 ohm, unamplified, dynamic cartridge. I hooked up the MIC hot & ground, PTT hot & ground to an 8 pin connector according to the Kenwood MIC pinout, and just used little computer jumpers to short the pins straight across on the K2's control board. In the initial tests, everyone that I talked with said it sounded great and not to change a thing. Later I borrowed an MH2 and was able to run comparisons. I was astounded when, in 10 QSO's on SSB, ALL of them told me the old Tempo VHF-1 microphone sounded better. The MH2 had plenty of punch and all, but the audio quality of the CB style microphone was better on my voice. It just goes to show that the K2 doesn't need a fancy, expensive microphone to sound good on the air. Pick up a $2.00 CB hand mic at a hamfest, wire it to fit and operate. Quit arguing over which microphone sounds better, you are losing valuable operating time! Jim Sheldon, W0EB > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of John Huffman > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 5:37 AM > To: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Replacement Hand Microphone > > > > What is the hand Mic of choice > > amongst this august group? Any suggestions are most > > welcome. > > Best Regards, Bob K7HBG > > > > Bob - > > I was making an adapter to use my MD2 desk mike with both my > K2 and my Pegasus. An email to Bob Heil confirmed my > suspicion that the MD2 was the same as Heil's "iC" amplified > mikes for Icom rigs. Thus, any Heil mike with the "iC" > suffix would be a functional equivalent to the Elecraft MH2 > or MD2. > > A visit to Heil's web site doesn't show any hand mikes, > which may explain why the MH2 was discontinued. But, there > is the little Handi Mic HM-"iC" that looks like a good > alternative. > > 73 de NA8M > John > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Jim Sheldon
I guess all the mikes for our rigs today have to be low impedance but I am
wondering how a D-104 would sound if we could get it to work! They have untold punch! Paul Gates K1 #0231 KX1 #1186 XG1 [hidden email] ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Jim Sheldon" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Replacement Hand Microphone Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:03:54 -0500 An amusing aside to this thread, when I built the SSB board for my K2, the only mic I had on hand was one from an old Tempo VHF-1 2 meter rig. This microphone is identical to many of the older CB microphones, and has a 600 ohm, unamplified, dynamic cartridge. I hooked up the MIC hot & ground, PTT hot & ground to an 8 pin connector according to the Kenwood MIC pinout, and just used little computer jumpers to short the pins straight across on the K2's control board. In the initial tests, everyone that I talked with said it sounded great and not to change a thing. Later I borrowed an MH2 and was able to run comparisons. I was astounded when, in 10 QSO's on SSB, ALL of them told me the old Tempo VHF-1 microphone sounded better. The MH2 had plenty of punch and all, but the audio quality of the CB style microphone was better on my voice. It just goes to show that the K2 doesn't need a fancy, expensive microphone to sound good on the air. Pick up a $2.00 CB hand mic at a hamfest, wire it to fit and operate. Quit arguing over which microphone sounds better, you are losing valuable operating time! Jim Sheldon, W0EB > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of John Huffman > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 5:37 AM > To: [hidden email]; [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Replacement Hand Microphone > > > > What is the hand Mic of choice > > amongst this august group? Any suggestions are most > > welcome. > > Best Regards, Bob K7HBG > > > > Bob - > > I was making an adapter to use my MD2 desk mike with both my > K2 and my Pegasus. An email to Bob Heil confirmed my > suspicion that the MD2 was the same as Heil's "iC" amplified > mikes for Icom rigs. Thus, any Heil mike with the "iC" > suffix would be a functional equivalent to the Elecraft MH2 > or MD2. > > A visit to Heil's web site doesn't show any hand mikes, > which may explain why the MH2 was discontinued. But, there > is the little Handi Mic HM-"iC" that looks like a good > alternative. > > 73 de NA8M > John > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by WØIFL
a "supercheap" computer stereo headset with boom mic!!!! $ 8.00
great sounding audio PRICELESS,,,,,, bill At 08:17 AM 7/20/2005, WØIFL wrote: >I didn't wanna say anything but I get better audio reports with a Radio >Shack el-cheapo mic than I do with the MH2 with my voice. > >RonE. >WØIFL. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Paul Gates
I bought a really pretty D-104 at a hamfest last Winter with the intent of
doing this. I would probably try it first with the stock mic element and amplifier but I also picked up a Heil element and ultimately planned on bypassing the amp and running the Heil element in the D-104. RonE. WØIFL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Gates" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 08:27 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Replacement Hand Microphone > I guess all the mikes for our rigs today have to be low impedance but I am > wondering how a D-104 would sound if we could get it to work! They have > untold punch! **snip** _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Paul Gates
Paul Gates wrote:
I guess all the mikes for our rigs today have to be low impedance but I am wondering how a D-104 would sound if we could get it to work! They have untold punch! ----------------------- I just finished refurbishing a D-104 for a buddy to use on his 1950's era E.F. Johnson Viking Ranger AM/CW transmitter and played around with it a bit. The later D-104's included a built-in preamplifier for use with modern rigs. The amp provides the necessary impedance matching since the D-104 uses a very high impedance crystal element. The amp is also important because modern rigs require a much higher audio level at the mic input than most of the old vacuum-tube jobs did. The D-104 has a peak in its response at about 3 kHz. Compared to the output at 1 kHz, the output is down about 10 db at 100 Hz and 6 kHz. The peak in the response at 3 kHz is up about 12 db. That 12-db "hump" gave the mic its characteristically bright sound that made the sibilances (s-sounds) in words very pronounced. In general, that helps with intelligibility. Audio shaping like that was far more important in the days of A.M. rigs because the audio amps in the rigs themselves seldom did much audio shaping. A little low frequency roll-off was usually provided by using low-valued coupling caps, but that was about all. Audio shaping for best voice intelligibility is still very important, but with the K2 it can be done largely by adjusting the BFO frequency and choosing the right filter bandwidth. The bandwidth of the K2's OPT1 filter used for SSB transmission is fixed, but it can be changed using the mod kits available from Elecraft. The K2 comes "stock" with an OPT1 filter bandwidth near 2 kHz because that provides optimum "punch" for most voices. That's especially important when running QRP. Wider bandwidths help some voices sound more natural. The most critical adjustment of the SSB filter is the position of that bandwidth in the audio spectrum. That defines the low and high frequency roll-off points. That's adjusted with the BFO using CAL FIL. That is why the SSB module setup instructions recommend listening to your signal on another receiver to choose the final settings for the BFO frequencies. That procedure is more complicated than just buying a good communications-quality mic like the D-104, but it allows the audio response to be much better tailored to an individual's voice than the old rigs did. While the K2 doesn't provide a peak in the mid-range, setting the roll-off points at the high and low ends of the audio range provides the same benefits. Ron AC7AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Paul Gates
Paul Gates wrote:
I guess all the mikes for our rigs today have to be low impedance but I am wondering how a D-104 would sound if we could get it to work! They have untold punch! ----------------------- I just finished refurbishing a D-104 for a buddy to use on his 1950's era E.F. Johnson Viking Ranger AM/CW transmitter and played around with it a bit. The later D-104's included a built-in preamplifier for use with modern rigs. The amp provides the necessary impedance matching since the D-104 uses a very high impedance crystal element. The amp is also important because modern rigs require a much higher audio level at the mic input than most of the old vacuum-tube jobs did. The D-104 has a peak in its response at about 3 kHz. Compared to the output at 1 kHz, the output is down about 10 db at 100 Hz and 6 kHz. The peak in the response at 3 kHz is up about 12 db. That 12-db "hump" gave the mic its characteristically bright sound that made the sibilances (s-sounds) in words very pronounced. In general, that helps with intelligibility. Audio shaping like that was far more important in the days of A.M. rigs because the audio amps in the rigs themselves seldom did much audio shaping. A little low frequency roll-off was usually provided by using low-valued coupling caps, but that was about all. Audio shaping for best voice intelligibility is still very important, but with the K2 it can be done largely by adjusting the BFO frequency and choosing the right filter bandwidth. The bandwidth of the K2's OPT1 filter used for SSB transmission is fixed, but it can be changed using the mod kits available from Elecraft. The K2 comes "stock" with an OPT1 filter bandwidth near 2 kHz because that provides optimum "punch" for most voices. That's especially important when running QRP. Wider bandwidths help some voices sound more natural. The most critical adjustment of the SSB filter is the position of that bandwidth in the audio spectrum. That defines the low and high frequency roll-off points. That's adjusted with the BFO using CAL FIL. That is why the SSB module setup instructions recommend listening to your signal on another receiver to choose the final settings for the BFO frequencies. That procedure is more complicated than just buying a good communications-quality mic like the D-104, but it allows the audio response to be much better tailored to an individual's voice than the old rigs did. While the K2 doesn't provide a peak in the mid-range, setting the roll-off points at the high and low ends of the audio range provides the same benefits. Ron AC7AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by WØIFL
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, WØIFL wrote:
> > > I didn't wanna say anything but I get better audio reports with a Radio > Shack el-cheapo mic than I do with the MH2 with my voice. When I decided I wanted to try SSB with the K2, I realized I no longer had a mike....so, I took the rig and the docs to the last local ham radio dealer in the area. The owner was a yong man who had the bad luck of having me administer his novice test some years ago. I asked him if he'd try and find a mike that worked with the K2. When I got back, he gave me a cassete tape, a player and a set of headphones....told me to listen and pick the sound that I liked the best, since he had tried several mikes....ranging from some high-end stuff to some down and dirty generic, Hey you lost your mike Good Buddie, I got one that works with anything. I picked, by the sound of his voice on the tape, the best sounding mike....and when I had, he asked me for 3.95 for the mike. I went home and that evening checked into a Maryland net that I hadn't been in over 30 years.....and some of my old budsasked if I was using my TR7 (g). 73,Thom-k3hrn www.zerobeat.net Home of QRP Web Ring, Drakelist home page, Free Classified Ads for amateur radio, QRP IRC channel Elecraft Owners Database www.tlchost.net/hosting/ *** Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Thom, K3HRN wrote:
I picked, by the sound of his voice on the tape, the best sounding mike....and when I had, he asked me for 3.95 for the mike. I went home and that evening checked into a Maryland net that I hadn't been in over 30 years.....and some of my old budsasked if I was using my TR7 (g). --------------------------- That sounds like my mic! Mine's the inexpensive ($2 or $3) Radio Shack electet element that I mounted in a housing that had originally held a cheap dynamic element. It has the best sound for me out of a number tested, including some pretty nice "hi-fi" mics. It is also very important to have the BFO settings correct. No mic can make up for having the passband positioned incorrectly. Ron AC7AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Paul Gates
You can either use a high impedance to low transformer for the D104 mike, or
get one of the D104 "amplified" mikes which has a impedance converting transistor circuit in its base, able to drive low impedance modern microphone inputs. The crystal high impedance element of the 104 needs to look into a high impedance to avoid altering the tone response. It will sound good, if properly terminated into the right circuit. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
On 7/20/05 3:44 PM, "Stuart Rohre" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> You can either use a high impedance to low transformer for the D104 mike, or > get one of the D104 "amplified" mikes which has a impedance converting > transistor circuit in its base, able to drive low impedance modern > microphone inputs. > > The crystal high impedance element of the 104 needs to look into a high > impedance to avoid altering the tone response. It will sound good, if > properly terminated into the right circuit. Alan, W2AEW, has a very nice construction article on one of his web pages: http://www.qsl.net/w2aew/myd104amp.html We've talked on air several times and his audio is excellent. If you have a D-104 with a functioning crystal (or ceramic) element, this circuit is a good way to match the hi-Z output to the low-Z input of modern rigs. Alan has been careful about RFI proofing and other essentials, such as tone characteristics and gain control. At the end of the page is the schematic for the original Astatic preamp. 73, Gus Hansen / KB0YH _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |