|
Elecraftians..... (sounds like a Indian Tribe from the Dakotas or from an alien planet) Would someone like to expound the virtues and advantages of adding the second receiver to the K3? I want to know what I could gain from have a second receiver in the K3. Lee - K0WA In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply. If you don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it. If you can't find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense. Is Common Sense divine? _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:32:55 -0700 (PDT), Lee Buller <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >Elecraftians..... (sounds like a Indian Tribe from the Dakotas or from an alien planet) > >Would someone like to expound the virtues and advantages of adding the second receiver to the K3? I want to know what I could gain from have a second receiver in the K3. > >Lee - K0WA > Lee, Most hams will say that it is an aid to working DX, because when the DX station is QSX on a frequency other than his TX frequency you can use the sub RX to find the frequency he is QSX on by finding the STNs he answering, and that is true, but I like them for another reason. Every time I get in a round table QSO on CW or SSB, nobody is on the same frequency. Being able to QSX on your TX frequency when working split lets you tune the net control in so that you will be TX on his freq and use the other RX to copy the other guys who can't seem to zero beat the NCS frequency. This keeps your TX on the correct frequency while allowing you to move the main RX around. You can do that with the A and B VFOs also, but it is a bit more difficult. I guess when it comes down to it it depends on how much you want to spend for convenience. Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" An excerpt from a letter written in 1755 from the Assembly to the Governor of Pennsylvania. Support the entire Constitution, not just the parts you like. http://www.n5ge.com http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
|
> Would someone like to expound the virtues and advantages of adding the second receiver to the K3? I want to know what I could gain from have a second receiver in the K3.
One reason I really wanted the second Rx in the K3 is from experience long ago in a town far, far away. QRM WARS I used to have a regular sked on 20 meter SSB with a friend in New Zealand. He was running low power to a simple dipole and his signal was often as weak as mine. Once we had our QSO going, someone would invariably stomp on his signal, tuning up and calling CQ, and then getting abusive if told that there was QSO in progress. (I know this never happens in the polite society of the 21st century, but it did in the early 1980s.) I then acquired a used Signal/One CX-7A. It had dual receive. After that, once our QSO started, I'd tune around with the second receiver to locate a clear spot. When we got QRM'ed, I'd tell him the new frequency, and instantly QSY to it and call him. Once we were chatting on that frequency, I'd tune around with the second receiver looking for a clear spot... 73, Lyle KK7P _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
It is also very convenient during contesting. When running on a given
freq and the QSO rate is going down, you can use the sub RX to work multipliers. It enables you to listen to your "run" freq and to the multiplier, work the multiplier quickly and immediately return to you run freq. That way you are able to keep your run freq. 73, Maarten van Rossum PD2R 2008/6/20, Lyle Johnson <[hidden email]>: > > > Would someone like to expound the virtues and advantages of adding the second receiver to the K3? I want to know what I could gain from have a second receiver in the K3. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com Maarten, PD2R Member of the PI4DX contest group www.pi4dx.com Elecraft K3 nr:1849 |
|
In reply to this post by KK7P
I'm hoping to do some experimentation with diversity reception to
significantly improve weak signal reception and reduce QSB. Something I know very little about and want to learn from those who have done it with other more elaborate systems: I hear the K3 offers most, if not all of what is needed in one package. David G3UNA >> Would someone like to expound the virtues and advantages of adding the >> second receiver to the K3? I want to know what I could gain from have a >> second receiver in the K3. > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
