Split using REV vs VFO A/B

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Split using REV vs VFO A/B

DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL
Like others (and most recently, Bill, ZV), I have used the TF-SET
(Rev) for decades.  And like still others, I found myself doing "bad"
things for VP6 when using the K3.  Still not sure how that happened.
LOL.

As I previously posted here, but possibly worth repeating, I have now
changed my modus operandi for split operation to using (as also just
posted) the VFO A/B button instead of the REV button.

I LOCK VFO A on my listening frequency (the DX xmitting QRG).  When I
want to "tune around amongst the other callers," I tap A/B and tune
around.  When done (by whatever measure...taking too long or found the
guy being worked), I just tap A/B again.

I don't have to worry about "slipping" off of the REV button and
tuning the "wrong" VFO.  Equally, since the DX qrg was LOCKED, it is
impossible for me to tune the "wrong" VFO.

Like anything, you have to try it for a while to figure out if it will
really work for you or not.  After doing it both ways for a while, I
find that I don't use REV any longer.  A/B is both easier (no holding)
and safer (no chance of slipping off the button).

So...give it a try.  I think you'll like it!

de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Split using REV vs VFO A/B

Leigh L. Klotz Jr WA5ZNU
Administrator
Just to confirm, if you lock A and use REV to tune and slip off, you're
still safe from changing A because the VFOs lock independently.
Leigh/WA5ZNU

Doug KR2Q wrote:

> I don't have to worry about "slipping" off of the REV button and
> tuning the "wrong" VFO.  Equally, since the DX qrg was LOCKED, it is
> impossible for me to tune the "wrong" VFO.
>
> Like anything, you have to try it for a while to figure out if it will
> really work for you or not.  After doing it both ways for a while, I
> find that I don't use REV any longer.  A/B is both easier (no holding)
> and safer (no chance of slipping off the button).
>
> So...give it a try.  I think you'll like it!
>
>
>  
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Split using REV vs VFO A/B

Tom Hammond-2
Leigh:

Yes... and no (at least at this particular instant...

The [LOCK] works as expected, BUT there is a TINY (but finite) point during the
transition from [REV] back to [LOCK] during which, if the VFO A knob is still
spinning when you release [LOCK], the VFO A knob might allow the "locked' VFO A
frequency 'jump' a bit (probably no more than 100 Hz) as a result of
the spinning
knob.

Wayne IS aware of this and it IS on his list of items to address. May not be
at a level '1', but it is relatively high in priority.

It's not quite perfect yet, but it WILL be fixed.

73,

Tom   N0SS

At 15:12 03/16/2008, you wrote:

>Just to confirm, if you lock A and use REV to tune and slip off,
>you're still safe from changing A because the VFOs lock independently.
>Leigh/WA5ZNU
>
>Doug KR2Q wrote:
>
>>I don't have to worry about "slipping" off of the REV button and
>>tuning the "wrong" VFO.  Equally, since the DX qrg was LOCKED, it is
>>impossible for me to tune the "wrong" VFO.
>>
>>Like anything, you have to try it for a while to figure out if it will
>>really work for you or not.  After doing it both ways for a while, I
>>find that I don't use REV any longer.  A/B is both easier (no holding)
>>and safer (no chance of slipping off the button).
>>
>>So...give it a try.  I think you'll like it!
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Post to: [hidden email]
>You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com