Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SSB filters
Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed With the recent experience in SSB? contests, I'm thinking of upgrading my SSB filter(s). Currently for SSB I have only the 2.8 filter. What are thoughts about other SSB filters? I know when I narrow the bandwidth to 1.8 the intelligibility goes down. -de John NI0K John, when narrowing the SSB bandwidth down to 1.8 use the shift control also and shift from 1.5 down to wards 1.05 or so. Makes a big difference. I'm sure a MACRO could be set up to do that automatically but I don't find it necessary often enough to worry about. 73,Gary KC9EE ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
John,
I have either 2.8 or 2.7 KHz filters in my K3s; I just don't remember which I ordered. I rely on the bandwidth of the filter that follows which is created by DSP. It works fine for me. I know this setup has stop bands that are around 105 db, but I don't know what the shape factor is; some of this is available from Bob Sherwood's site. The filters you are discussing are roofing filters. They are primarily there to protect the the ADC from seeing too much energy and overloading. Selectivity is secondary. Unless you perceive that you are having a problem, I wouldn't go to the trouble of swapping out filters. However, there are a number of hams who will disagree with me. 73, Barry K3NDM ------ Original Message ------ From: "Gary Hunt via Elecraft" <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: 3/31/2020 2:55:44 PM Subject: [Elecraft] Subject: K3 SSB filters >Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SSB filters >Message-ID: <[hidden email]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > >With the recent experience in SSB? contests, I'm thinking of upgrading >my SSB filter(s). Currently for SSB I have only the 2.8 filter. What are >thoughts about other SSB filters? I know when I narrow the bandwidth to >1.8 the intelligibility goes down. > >-de John NI0K > > >John, when narrowing the SSB bandwidth down to 1.8 use the shift control also and shift from 1.5 down to wards 1.05 or so. Makes a big difference. I'm sure a MACRO could be set up to do that automatically but I don't find it necessary often enough to worry about. >73,Gary KC9EE >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[hidden email] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
Yes, but with a 1.8 kHz filter, the adjacent QRM goes away as well.
One can't have good quality from a wide bandwidth if the adjacent station is splattering over into your receiver bandwidth. Something has got to give. After all, it is communications quality audio. Narrow the bandwidth to 1.8 kHz and adjust the SHIFT to better the quality and lessen the QRM. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 3/31/2020 1:55 PM, Gary Hunt via Elecraft wrote: > Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SSB filters > Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > With the recent experience in SSB? contests, I'm thinking of upgrading > my SSB filter(s). Currently for SSB I have only the 2.8 filter. What are > thoughts about other SSB filters? I know when I narrow the bandwidth to > 1.8 the intelligibility goes down. > > -de John NI0K > > > John, when narrowing the SSB bandwidth down to 1.8 use the shift control also and shift from 1.5 down to wards 1.05 or so. Makes a big difference. I'm sure a MACRO could be set up to do that automatically but I don't find it necessary often enough to worry about. > 73,Gary KC9EE > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |