Administrator
|
We have about 60 K3 owners testing the K3's new AGC. I'm sure we'll
hear from some of them, but here's a summary of comments they've sent to me so far: - copy is much improved in dense pile-up conditions - signals have more "clarity" - QSB is more noticeable on weak signals (this is to be expected on signals that are not activating AGC) - the noise blanker has become more effective in some cases (also expected; its effect is not being muted by AGC compression) I'll be happy to send out additional copies of the new firmware. If all goes well this should become a beta release next week. 73, Wayne N6KR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Hi Wayne, I would like to try the new firmware!
THX & 73, Bill N2BC -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Wayne Burdick Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 11:06 AM To: Elecraft Reflector Cc: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] Summary of comments on new K3 AGC We have about 60 K3 owners testing the K3's new AGC. I'm sure we'll hear from some of them, but here's a summary of comments they've sent to me so far: - copy is much improved in dense pile-up conditions - signals have more "clarity" - QSB is more noticeable on weak signals (this is to be expected on signals that are not activating AGC) - the noise blanker has become more effective in some cases (also expected; its effect is not being muted by AGC compression) I'll be happy to send out additional copies of the new firmware. If all goes well this should become a beta release next week. 73, Wayne N6KR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by wayne burdick
Hi Wayne,
How does the AGC work with respect to the Sub RX? Do the AGC config settings affect both the main and sub in the same manner? Will the latest improvements also be noticeable on the sub RX. While listening to the CW pileups for 7O6T on the sub RX I felt that I was hearing the mush that others have described for the first time. 73, Mike K2MK
|
Administrator
|
Mike K2MK wrote:
> How does the AGC work with respect to the Sub RX? Do the AGC config > settings > affect both the main and sub in the same manner? Yes. > Will the latest improvements also be noticeable on the sub RX? Yes -- the two receivers are identical, and will be improved in the same way. Wayne N6KR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by wayne burdick
Wayne Burdick wrote:
>We have about 60 K3 owners testing the K3's new AGC. I'm sure we'll >hear from some of them, but here's a summary of comments they've sent >to me so far: > >- copy is much improved in dense pile-up conditions > >- signals have more "clarity" > >- QSB is more noticeable on weak signals (this is to be > expected on signals that are not activating AGC) > >- the noise blanker has become more effective in some cases > (also expected; its effect is not being muted by AGC compression) > >I'll be happy to send out additional copies of the new firmware. If >all goes well this should become a beta release next week. > Does this affect the C238 modification? -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Administrator
|
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
>> We have about 60 K3 owners testing the K3's new AGC.... > Does this affect the C238 modification? No. The new DSP AGC changes are completely independent of the hardware AGC time constant. Increasing the size of C238 was experimental (maybe even "dodgy", in hindsight, to use the vernacular). It may help with much stronger signals (S9+20 or so is where hardware AGC really kicks in). But I think we've now demonstrated that in-band IMD in dense S3-S5 pile-ups can be reduced with DSP AGC changes. Wayne N6KR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |