I can see the point of this for mass or machine-made production, but for a home-built kit there’s a simpler idea. If the instruction is not to overtighten – as for the screws holding plastic bezels in place – I use a screwdriver with a smaller diameter handle. If the screw needs to be ferociously fastened, then a larger diameter handle. The relative mechanical advantage could be calculated but probably not the actual torque – that’s a function of muscle exertion and I don’t know how to calibrate that. When the instruction says “Do Not Overtighten” I just reach for a smaller tool.
Ted, KN1CBR
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 08:34:04 -0500
From: Clay Autery <
[hidden email]>
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] PA Transistors Maintenance in K2
Message-ID: <
[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
It is possible that an explicit torque has never been calculated.? It is
not a particularly hard thing to do however.
I do not have a K2, so I can't do it, but here's the idea:
1) Fastener size/type, material, thread spec: (e.g. 4-40 x ___ pan head,
phillips, zinc coated, non-rated steel
2) What does fastener anchor in?? (e.g. aluminum heat sink, what alloy
aluminum, thickness of threaded area.
3) Thread spec... not JUST the #4, 40 tpi, but the rating for thread
engagement.
4) Check the specs for the RF transistor.... package, et al.? Docs
may/should have a max torque spec for the package.... maybe... package
material, etc.
5) # of fasteners... usually 1 maybe 2.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to
[hidden email]
Locked
