Greetings all,
The original purpose of the UK Foundation licence 'approved kit' rule was to limit the likelihood of a M3 (ie Foundation) amateur transmitting out of band either by excessive tuning range or excessive spurious. However the merit of allowing transmission with home-brew equipment was recognised. CE legislation made definition difficult, as already observed, kits were exempt from needing a CE mark. Early BR68/F documents simply said "approved commercial kit". Even a ready built commercial offering could transmit "out of band" since, then 28MHz was out of band for Foundation. However the display clearly indicated that as well as the band edges of the other bands in a way that a kit might not, especially if using an analogue display. The onus always ultimately was on the person pressing the ptt and the aim was to give that person fair (and accurate) display of what they were doing. Now, 28MHz is permitted and dealers may modify old or commercial PMR equipment and give the M3 a letter-headed report of compliance to IR2028. Actually the IR does limit the transmitter. If it is able to transmit outside the specified bands then it is not 2028 compliant (unless it is very very clear to the operator that he/she is about to do that). Ooops I didn't know that is not a defence. Regards 73 Alan G0HIQ ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your free account today http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Alan G0HIQ wrote on Friday, June 15, 2007 11:52 AM :
> The original purpose of the UK Foundation licence 'approved > kit' rule was to limit the likelihood of a M3 (ie > Foundation) amateur transmitting out of band either by > excessive tuning range or excessive spurious. However the > merit of allowing transmission with home-brew equipment was > recognised. _________________________________________________________ To digress a little, it is amazing ( to me anyway) how many people regardless of licence class or country cuddle up to the top edge of their 40m band allocation when transmitting LSB, with their 'unwanted' sideband and IMD products falling outside of the band. No doubt this happens on 80m as well. 73, Geoff GM4ESD _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy wrote:
> > To digress a little, it is amazing ( to me anyway) how many people regardless > of licence class or country cuddle up to the top edge of their 40m band > allocation when transmitting LSB, with their 'unwanted' sideband and IMD > products falling outside of the band. No doubt this happens on 80m as well. Conventional wisdom that 80 and 40 are LSB bands might account for it. After all, if there is "no USB" when you are using LSB, you should be able to run rght up to the edge. I suppose the real nitpick is if the unwanted sideband and IMD products outside of the band are within allowable limits? Of course if folks were extra cautious, then there might be room for a cw qso up there (g). Thom,EIEIO Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer k3hrn www.baltimorehon.com/ Home of the Baltimore Lexicon www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
On Friday, June 15, 2007 Thom LaCosta wrote:
> I suppose the real nitpick is if the unwanted sideband and IMD products > outside of the band are within allowable limits? Agree, and there's the problem if some nitpicky monitoring station operator has nothing better to do than listen out for IMD products. Nobody seems to care if some multi carrier digital "thing" takes out 25 kHz of the band around 7160 kHz when you guys are awake and coming through. > Of course if folks were extra cautious, then there might be room for a cw > qso up there (g). I'll ignore that <g> 73, Geoff GM4ESD _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy wrote:
> >> Of course if folks were extra cautious, then there might be room for a cw >> qso up there (g). > > I'll ignore that <g> In the bad old days, it was quite common for a bunch of us to meet on "the other sideband" and have CW qsos....as I recall, we would pick the frequency where the guys with the best suppression of the unwanted sideband hung out. Thom,EIEIO Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer k3hrn www.baltimorehon.com/ Home of the Baltimore Lexicon www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |