|
I'd like to hear from CW operators who have upgraded to the new synthesizer
boards. Is there a material/noticeable change in the K3 performance? Do you think the upgrade was worth it? Pete, W1RM ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Hello Pete,
It probably depends upon what aspects of CW operation are most important to you. IMHO, the upgrade was well worth it. I posted my comments about it yesterday with the subject line: "[K3] New KSYN3A CW timing" 73, Dale WA8SRA > I'd like to hear from CW operators who have upgraded to the new > synthesizer > boards. Is there a material/noticeable change in the K3 performance? Do > you > think the upgrade was worth it? > > > > > > Pete, W1RM ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Peter Chamalian W1RM
Pete and other interested parties,
IMO, yes, it was worth it, but as previously stated by others, it depends on what your operating style/habits are. If you are a casual CW operator and don't really use QSK, you may never notice the changes as they are really subtle to most ears. Most noticeable to me, the switching transitions from RX to TX and back are much cleaner and enough faster that normal QSK without turning QSK mode on will allow you to hear smoothly between dots at 45-50 wpm. Also it's fast enough that the internal keyer's CW weighting sounds like it should rather than having to weight it heavier. I mainly use a bug these days, but the transitions are smooth enough that the harsh switching has been toned down to the point the sidetone sounds very nice and It is so smooth and fast that while I'm sending (at least up to 30 wpm - haven't tried it faster yet) it sounds like the RX never shuts off. With the old synthesizer(s) (I have both receivers) there was a very small hesitation between key down and key up before the RX came back to life. I do not notice that anymore though physically it has to still be there. The much faster switching time makes it more pleasant to someone like me who has used mostly CW and QSK for my whole 50+ years in ham radio. It's almost like having separate transmitters and receivers linked to the same VFO, using separate antennas and no receiver muting, only RF overload protection. (Only way I know to explain it). Your mileage will certainly vary. Jim - W0EB ------ Original Message ------ From: "Peter Chamalian W1RM" <[hidden email]> To: "'Elecraft Reflector'" <[hidden email]> Sent: 2/24/2015 8:00:24 AM Subject: [Elecraft] Upgrading to the new Syn Card -- is there a noticable change? >I'd like to hear from CW operators who have upgraded to the new >synthesizer >boards. Is there a material/noticeable change in the K3 performance? Do >you >think the upgrade was worth it? > > > > > >Pete, W1RM > > > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[hidden email] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Thanks for the comment. I am a CW contester and DXer. I use QSK but with
CW QRQ off. Of particular interest is the performance when you are the subject of a pileup as is often the case in a contest when you are running. Pete, W1RM -----Original Message----- From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim's Desktop Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 10:15 AM To: 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Upgrading to the new Syn Card -- is there a noticable change? Pete and other interested parties, IMO, yes, it was worth it, but as previously stated by others, it depends on what your operating style/habits are. If you are a casual CW operator and don't really use QSK, you may never notice the changes as they are really subtle to most ears. Most noticeable to me, the switching transitions from RX to TX and back are much cleaner and enough faster that normal QSK without turning QSK mode on will allow you to hear smoothly between dots at 45-50 wpm. Also it's fast enough that the internal keyer's CW weighting sounds like it should rather than having to weight it heavier. I mainly use a bug these days, but the transitions are smooth enough that the harsh switching has been toned down to the point the sidetone sounds very nice and It is so smooth and fast that while I'm sending (at least up to 30 wpm - haven't tried it faster yet) it sounds like the RX never shuts off. With the old synthesizer(s) (I have both receivers) there was a very small hesitation between key down and key up before the RX came back to life. I do not notice that anymore though physically it has to still be there. The much faster switching time makes it more pleasant to someone like me who has used mostly CW and QSK for my whole 50+ years in ham radio. It's almost like having separate transmitters and receivers linked to the same VFO, using separate antennas and no receiver muting, only RF overload protection. (Only way I know to explain it). Your mileage will certainly vary. Jim - W0EB ------ Original Message ------ From: "Peter Chamalian W1RM" <[hidden email]> To: "'Elecraft Reflector'" <[hidden email]> Sent: 2/24/2015 8:00:24 AM Subject: [Elecraft] Upgrading to the new Syn Card -- is there a noticable change? >I'd like to hear from CW operators who have upgraded to the new >synthesizer >boards. Is there a material/noticeable change in the K3 performance? Do >you >think the upgrade was worth it? > > > > > >Pete, W1RM > > > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[hidden email] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Peter Chamalian W1RM
Considering the time and effort to make them happen, all Elecraft
upgrades are worth it. Whether you want to own an "upgraded" radio or a "downgraded" radio is up to you. Kent K9ZTV On 2/24/2015 8:00 AM, someone wrote: > Do you think the upgrade was worth it? > > > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
It is not worth the time and effort, forget the cost, to upgrade
George, W6GF On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 8:42 AM, KENT TRIMBLE <[hidden email]> wrote: Considering the time and effort to make them happen, all Elecraft upgrades are worth it. Whether you want to own an "upgraded" radio or a "downgraded" radio is up to you. Kent K9ZTV On 2/24/2015 8:00 AM, someone wrote: > Do you think the upgrade was worth it? > > > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Only took me 20 min, George. Very noticeable improvement on CW contest last weekend.
Phil - Sent from my iPad > On Feb 24, 2015, at 09:28, george fritkin via Elecraft <[hidden email]> wrote: > > It is not worth the time and effort, forget the cost, to upgrade > George, W6GF > > On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 8:42 AM, KENT TRIMBLE <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Considering the time and effort to make them happen, all Elecraft > upgrades are worth it. > > Whether you want to own an "upgraded" radio or a "downgraded" radio is > up to you. > > Kent K9ZTV > > > >> On 2/24/2015 8:00 AM, someone wrote: >> Do you think the upgrade was worth it? > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
George,
So you've actually purchased, installed, and worked with the new synth card(s)? With what were you disappointed? Dale WA8SRA > It is not worth the time and effort, forget the cost, to upgrade > George, W6GF > > On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 8:42 AM, KENT TRIMBLE > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Considering the time and effort to make them happen, all Elecraft > upgrades are worth it. > > Whether you want to own an "upgraded" radio or a "downgraded" radio is > up to you. > > Kent K9ZTV > > > > On 2/24/2015 8:00 AM, someone wrote: >> Do you think the upgrade was worth it? >> >> >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Peter Chamalian W1RM
For me I installed the new KSYN3A for a different reason, I wanted the 100-490 kHz additional range.
I have been using RX Converters for years to listen to that range and have been wanting to builda new converter for that range that would be locked to the same 10 MHz reference as the K3. Then out of the blue Elecraft released the new KSYN3A board pretty much providing the solution. From: Peter Chamalian W1RM <[hidden email]> To: 'Elecraft Reflector' <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 9:00 AM Subject: [Elecraft] Upgrading to the new Syn Card -- is there a noticable change? I'd like to hear from CW operators who have upgraded to the new synthesizer boards. Is there a material/noticeable change in the K3 performance? Do you think the upgrade was worth it? Pete, W1RM ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
Totally dependent on what you expect from it. Something I missed since my
Kenwood TS930 days was SWL'ing the beacons. That extended coverage was worth the cost to me. Anything else is a bonus. Also looking for the QSK improvement as a secondary reason but would not have influenced my decision. So bought 2 PWA's hope to get them in this week. 73, Bob K2TK ex KN2TKR (1956) & K2TKR On 2/24/2015 12:28 PM, george fritkin via Elecraft wrote: > It is not worth the time and effort, forget the cost, to upgrade > George, W6GF > > On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 8:42 AM, KENT TRIMBLE <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Considering the time and effort to make them happen, all Elecraft > upgrades are worth it. > > Whether you want to own an "upgraded" radio or a "downgraded" radio is > up to you. > > Kent K9ZTV > > > > On 2/24/2015 8:00 AM, someone wrote: >> Do you think the upgrade was worth it? Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
