|
Here is something I would like to see on the P3.
The P3 saves the REF LVL setting per band. But of course the noise level on a given band varies as conditions change, and I find myself often adjusting the REF LVL. The optimum setting is with the REF LVL just below the noise level. Setting it higher loses detail, and setting it lower fills the waterfall with noise. What I would like would be to adjust the REF LVL to optimum with respect to the noise level and then save this relationship. Then I would like to be able to push a function button to automatically adjust the REF LVL to re-establish the same relationship. This would make the readjustment, which I find myself making every few minutes sometimes, much quicker and easier. I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to the noise level. -- 73, Vic, 4X6GP/K2VCO Rehovot, Israel http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
> I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to > the noise level. I agree. Put another way, I'd like to see a reverse baseline "clamp" - something along the line of holding REF LVL 5 dB below the average noise level. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2015-03-06 7:56 AM, Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO wrote: > Here is something I would like to see on the P3. > > The P3 saves the REF LVL setting per band. But of course the noise level > on a given band varies as conditions change, and I find myself often > adjusting the REF LVL. > > The optimum setting is with the REF LVL just below the noise level. > Setting it higher loses detail, and setting it lower fills the waterfall > with noise. > > What I would like would be to adjust the REF LVL to optimum with respect > to the noise level and then save this relationship. Then I would like to > be able to push a function button to automatically adjust the REF LVL to > re-establish the same relationship. > > This would make the readjustment, which I find myself making every few > minutes sometimes, much quicker and easier. > > I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to the > noise level. Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Wouldn't that need to be dampened a lot. What happens if there is QRN, you
wouldn't want to be pushing the real stuff down. It would NOT be a simple function, and there would be wide variation on what seemed "slick". 73, Guy On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to >> the noise level. >> > > I agree. Put another way, I'd like to see a reverse baseline "clamp" - > something along the line of holding REF LVL 5 dB below the average > noise level. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > On 2015-03-06 7:56 AM, Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO wrote: > >> Here is something I would like to see on the P3. >> >> The P3 saves the REF LVL setting per band. But of course the noise level >> on a given band varies as conditions change, and I find myself often >> adjusting the REF LVL. >> >> The optimum setting is with the REF LVL just below the noise level. >> Setting it higher loses detail, and setting it lower fills the waterfall >> with noise. >> >> What I would like would be to adjust the REF LVL to optimum with respect >> to the noise level and then save this relationship. Then I would like to >> be able to push a function button to automatically adjust the REF LVL to >> re-establish the same relationship. >> >> This would make the readjustment, which I find myself making every few >> minutes sometimes, much quicker and easier. >> >> I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to the >> noise level. >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
Well, what I was thinking was that you could activate the option and
adjust the REF LVL with the knob to whatever offset from the noise level that you wanted, and then save that 'offset'. On 6 Mar 2015 17:16, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > >> I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to >> the noise level. > > I agree. Put another way, I'd like to see a reverse baseline "clamp" - > something along the line of holding REF LVL 5 dB below the average > noise level. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > On 2015-03-06 7:56 AM, Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO wrote: >> Here is something I would like to see on the P3. >> >> The P3 saves the REF LVL setting per band. But of course the noise level >> on a given band varies as conditions change, and I find myself often >> adjusting the REF LVL. >> >> The optimum setting is with the REF LVL just below the noise level. >> Setting it higher loses detail, and setting it lower fills the waterfall >> with noise. >> >> What I would like would be to adjust the REF LVL to optimum with respect >> to the noise level and then save this relationship. Then I would like to >> be able to push a function button to automatically adjust the REF LVL to >> re-establish the same relationship. >> >> This would make the readjustment, which I find myself making every few >> minutes sometimes, much quicker and easier. >> >> I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to the >> noise level. -- 73, Vic, 4X6GP/K2VCO Rehovot, Israel http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Guy Olinger K2AV
I don't want it to try to maintain the level automatically. I want to be
able to recall the saved offset with a function button push. That way it is up to me if I want to reset it. On 6 Mar 2015 18:16, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > Wouldn't that need to be dampened a lot. What happens if there is QRN, you > wouldn't want to be pushing the real stuff down. It would NOT be a simple > function, and there would be wide variation on what seemed "slick". > > 73, Guy > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to >>> the noise level. >>> >> >> I agree. Put another way, I'd like to see a reverse baseline "clamp" - >> something along the line of holding REF LVL 5 dB below the average >> noise level. >> >> 73, >> >> ... Joe, W4TV >> >> >> On 2015-03-06 7:56 AM, Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO wrote: >> >>> Here is something I would like to see on the P3. >>> >>> The P3 saves the REF LVL setting per band. But of course the noise level >>> on a given band varies as conditions change, and I find myself often >>> adjusting the REF LVL. >>> >>> The optimum setting is with the REF LVL just below the noise level. >>> Setting it higher loses detail, and setting it lower fills the waterfall >>> with noise. >>> >>> What I would like would be to adjust the REF LVL to optimum with respect >>> to the noise level and then save this relationship. Then I would like to >>> be able to push a function button to automatically adjust the REF LVL to >>> re-establish the same relationship. >>> >>> This would make the readjustment, which I find myself making every few >>> minutes sometimes, much quicker and easier. >>> >>> I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to the >>> noise level. -- 73, Vic, 4X6GP/K2VCO Rehovot, Israel http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Guy Olinger K2AV
On 2015-03-06 11:16 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > Wouldn't that need to be dampened a lot. Yes, it would need to be a long-term average. However, I don't see that as particularly more difficult than any other type of AGC particularly given the level of computing power in the P3. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2015-03-06 11:16 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > Wouldn't that need to be dampened a lot. What happens if there is QRN, you > wouldn't want to be pushing the real stuff down. It would NOT be a simple > function, and there would be wide variation on what seemed "slick". > > 73, Guy > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >> I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to >>> the noise level. >>> >> >> I agree. Put another way, I'd like to see a reverse baseline "clamp" - >> something along the line of holding REF LVL 5 dB below the average >> noise level. >> >> 73, >> >> ... Joe, W4TV >> >> >> On 2015-03-06 7:56 AM, Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO wrote: >> >>> Here is something I would like to see on the P3. >>> >>> The P3 saves the REF LVL setting per band. But of course the noise level >>> on a given band varies as conditions change, and I find myself often >>> adjusting the REF LVL. >>> >>> The optimum setting is with the REF LVL just below the noise level. >>> Setting it higher loses detail, and setting it lower fills the waterfall >>> with noise. >>> >>> What I would like would be to adjust the REF LVL to optimum with respect >>> to the noise level and then save this relationship. Then I would like to >>> be able to push a function button to automatically adjust the REF LVL to >>> re-establish the same relationship. >>> >>> This would make the readjustment, which I find myself making every few >>> minutes sometimes, much quicker and easier. >>> >>> I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to the >>> noise level. >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] >> > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Vic Rosenthal
Yep, that would be cool, although I'm not sure it's doable. Would
likely work if you were switching bands often, but if you don't come back to a band in a reasonable time, the "average" may be as invalid as REF LVL currently is. I generally take K9YC's advice if it pertains to audio, sometimes I'm a little slower on non-audio things. Jim runs P3 spectrum averaging as high as it will go. I never did ... fascination with the jumping spectrum display? I'm currently running at 12 for the spectrum and OFF for the WF and the WF is what I look at and I like the results. I find I don't have to adjust the REF LVL nearly as much. Having found out that 12 is safe for averaging, I may push it up. But, seriously, to my surprise, it really does tend to hold the REF LVL much more constant which is what I was looking for in the first place. 73, Fred K6DGW - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015 - www.cqp.org On 3/6/2015 4:56 AM, Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO wrote: > I don't want to save the REF LVL. I want to save its relationship to the > noise level. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
