I don't think a clamp-on transverter would be a good idea, one of the ideas behind the KX3 is to make it small, and an clamp-on transsverter would make it bigger.
Martin Storli
LA8OKA
Oslo, Norway
ARCTICPEAK's Radio pages!
http://www.arcticpeak.com/radio.htmFra: Edward R. Cole <
[hidden email]>
Til:
[hidden email]
Sendt: Tirsdag, 1. mai 2012 17.06
Emne: [Elecraft] Vedr: Why settle for KX3-2M? Why not KX3-2M/70cm?
I do not have my KX3 in-hand to give it a good looking over, but
based on photos I am wondering if a clamp-on module could not be
added to the back (to fit the same foot-print) and provide sufficient
room for a multi-band transceiver, say 144-222-432?
I know the XV line covets this range so not out of Elecraft's
territory to make such a "critter". Then the KX3 will indeed be a
contender-succeeder to the FT-817.
Anyway just throwing out this as an idea for future projects.
73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
======================================
BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com
EME: 50-1.1kw?, 144-1.4kw, 432-QRT, 1296-?, 3400-?
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep
[hidden email]
"Kits made by KL7UW"
http://www.kl7uw.com/kits.htm======================================
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Locked
