Wanted KIO2

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Wanted KIO2

Ron Pfeiffer
Any K2/100 builders have a KI02 not being used or anyone else have one?
Interested in getting one built or un-built.

Ron

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Wanted KIO2

Tom Althoff
Wayne N6KR mentioned the following in a discussion about cable length
between a K2/(100) and a remoted KAT-100

"2. If you're using a KPA100 in your K2, and you do find that power readings
are
unstable with the long KAT100 control cable, you can disconnect the "VRFDET"
wire at both ends of the control cable. This is because the KPA100 itself
provides the VRFDET signal to the K2, not the KAT100. If you have no KPA100,
though, you'll have to keep the VRFDET line connected, since the KAT100
supplies
the VRFDET signal in this case. But of course power levels are much lower
without the KAT100, and chances are there would be no RFI problem."

My KAT-100 is attached permanantly to the bottom of my K2/100 and the
control lines fed directly between the top and bottom units.   Don W3FPR and
I were discussing shielding the ribbon cable between the two units to
discourage any RF voltage appearing on the vRFdet line but perhaps Wayne has
pointed to the easy fix.

Two questions:
1) Since vRFdet is fed from my internal KPA-100 Wayne says the vRFdet line
from the KAT-100 can be left unwired correct?  This would reduce any chance
of stray RF pickup on that line.

2) If the above it true...in theory....I would not even need U6 (EL5146C) in
the circuit of the KAT-100.   Mine failed and was pulling down the vRFdet
line in the K2.   I'm going to install a socket at U6 in either case,
populated or not.   I was not aware that it is not used when running with a
KPA-100.

As a reminder of what is physically going on with my K2/100/AT.   This is
how I've been running my K2/100/KAT-100 for the past year:
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_2d.jpg
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_back.jpg
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_back2.jpg
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_front1.jpg
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_front2.jpg
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_knotch.jpg
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_leftside.jpg
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_screw.jpg
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_side1.jpg

Tom K2TA
K2/100 #1117

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

VRFDET line optional?

Tom Althoff
First of all..my appologies for hijacking the "KIO2 Wanted" thread.  It was
unintentional.   I often do a quick "reply all" to a previous post,  delete
the body and subject of the e-mail and make a new post.  I forgot to change
the subject on this to be more fitting.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Althoff" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Wanted KIO2


Wayne N6KR mentioned the following in a discussion about cable length
 between a K2/(100) and a remoted KAT-100

 "2. If you're using a KPA100 in your K2, and you do find that power
readings
 are
 unstable with the long KAT100 control cable, you can disconnect the
"VRFDET"
 wire at both ends of the control cable. This is because the KPA100 itself
 provides the VRFDET signal to the K2, not the KAT100. If you have no
KPA100,
 though, you'll have to keep the VRFDET line connected, since the KAT100
 supplies
 the VRFDET signal in this case. But of course power levels are much lower
 without the KAT100, and chances are there would be no RFI problem."

 My KAT-100 is attached permanantly to the bottom of my K2/100 and the
 control lines fed directly between the top and bottom units.   Don W3FPR
and
 I were discussing shielding the ribbon cable between the two units to
 discourage any RF voltage appearing on the vRFdet line but perhaps Wayne
has
 pointed to the easy fix.

 Two questions:
 1) Since vRFdet is fed from my internal KPA-100 Wayne says the vRFdet line
 from the KAT-100 can be left unwired correct?  This would reduce any chance
 of stray RF pickup on that line.

 2) If the above it true...in theory....I would not even need U6 (EL5146C)
in
 the circuit of the KAT-100.   Mine failed and was pulling down the vRFdet
 line in the K2.   I'm going to install a socket at U6 in either case,
 populated or not.   I was not aware that it is not used when running with a
 KPA-100.

 As a reminder of what is physically going on with my K2/100/AT.   This is
 how I've been running my K2/100/KAT-100 for the past year:
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_2d.jpg
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_back.jpg
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_back2.jpg
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_front1.jpg
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_front2.jpg
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_knotch.jpg
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_leftside.jpg
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_screw.jpg
 http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_side1.jpg

 Tom K2TA
 K2/100 #1117


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: VRFDET line optional?

Bob Nielsen

> First of all..my appologies for hijacking the "KIO2 Wanted"  
> thread.  It was
> unintentional.   I often do a quick "reply all" to a previous  
> post,  delete
> the body and subject of the e-mail and make a new post.  I forgot  
> to change
> the subject on this to be more fitting.

Even doing that isn't really a good idea, since some email clients  
thread messages using the "In-Reply-To" or "References" headers,  
which are often hidden from view.

73, Bob N7XY
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com