Administrator
|
There's been so much discussion about this topic that I'd thought I'd
better try to clarify why we used the term when announcing the K3. A "Roofing filter" is simply a filter in the radio's first I.F. through which all signals must pass before they will be "seen" by later receiver stages. The narrower this filter is, the less exposure later stages will have. Thus a "narrow" roofing filter is desirable -- but "narrow" is relative, as I'll explain. The term "roofing filter" has most often been used in relation to triple- or quadruple-conversion receivers. Such receivers have an I.F. *above* the highest RF band covered; it's typically something in the range of 30 to 70 MHz or higher. But "roofing" as a term should be interpreted as "protective," not "high in frequency." A roofing filter *protects* later stages, including amplifiers, mixers, narrower filters, and DSP subsystems, just as the roof on your house keeps rain out of *all* of the rooms. But a roofing filter can be equally at home at a *low* first I.F. if that is how the radio is designed. It still provides the same protective function. When we released the K2, in 1999, we never described our 1st I.F. crystal filters as roofing filters. We had only one I.F., so the receiver model was simpler; there were no narrow filters at later stages that required protection. But in 2007, we find that the term is in widespread use. Average hams now think of roofing filter bandwidths as the standard of comparison between receivers. This is why manufacturers have jumped through hoops to try to provide the narrowest possible roofing filters. Many operators have an understanding (justified) that a roofing filter that is wider than the communications bandwidth will not best protect the receiver's later stages. So the term now seems appropriate to use even in a radio such as the K2, K3, or Orion, all of which use low-frequency IFs (5 to 9 MHz). In recent years, the roofing filter has become the centerpiece of receiver re-design: Suppose that manufacturer "A" initially designed their receiver to use a 15- or 20-kHz roofing filter. Yes, this allows the receiver to handle NBFM and other wide modulation modes; it may also be selected to constrain the signal bandwidth ahead of a noise blanker or spectrum scope. But it comes at a price. If you're using CW mode, you'll have much narrower filters selected at the radio's 2nd and 3rd IFs. Yet the 1st I.F. roofing filter allows a broad swath of signals into the earlier stages. You don't need this energy in your passband. It can cause trouble. Manufacturer "A," realizing they have a problem with dynamic range at close spacings, then announces that they've had a breakthrough: they can now offer a 6-kHz, or more recently 3-kHz roofing filter. This will certainly improve the situation for SSB and AM operation, but it still opens the barn door in CW or DATA modes, because the bandwidth is a factor of 10 wider than needed for communications. So why don't they offer much narrower roofing filters that can be switched in for CW and data modes, or at times when adjacent-channel SSB QRM is very high? It's because they can't make filters any narrower at such a high I.F. Enter the "downconversion" rig (K2, K3, Orion, etc.). By converting to a low first I.F., the designer can easily create narrow filters that are compatible with the required communications bandwidth. This is why we are offering filters with bandwidths as low as 200 Hz, as well as (in the future), variable-passband crystal filters. And yes, these are still "roofing" filters, because they limit exposure (bandwidth), thus protecting later stages (in the K3 case, the I.F. amp, 2nd mixer, and DSP). 73, Wayne N6KR CTO Elecraft, Inc. --- http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |